Leaderboard

I agree. I do not agree. You are a poster here in this thread like me, no more, no less. You can ask whatever you want but asking does not mean it is an order and everyone has to obey. If you don't want to reply to a post for whatever reason, it's your decision. You are free to do what you think. But same applies to me, too, of course. And once again, posting images for documenting purpose is no spamming, and it doesn't matter whether you like it or not. This thread is about the subject matter and not about sensitivities. Period. Now, back on topic, take any extension, remove the META-INF folder, and you've got an unsigned extension. Try to install it, and you will see what happens.

@feodor2 My posts are always rich in words, precise explanations, documented by images if necessary, on topic and written in the best possible English. You are the developer of Mypal 68 and for that you deserve recognition, but in this thread, you are a poster like any other. So please, act like it! Here, we are not in your issues on GitHub, where you have a lot of spammers and insulters, unfortunately. That's the reason why I stopped reporting issues there a few weeks ago, BTW.

What are you talking about? I ask you a simple question. And to be crystal clear, posting images for documenting facts is no spamming. You should know that regardless of your personal preferences. Everyone is different. Anyway! Based on the nature of your reply, I'll have to assume that your statement about removing the signature verification is indeed incorrect.

@feodor2 Thanks for the new release! In the release notes of Mypal 68.13.7b, you wrote: Unfortunately, I cannot confirm your statement in bold. The signature verification is still active in version 68.13.7b, and certain, unverified extensions do not work properly after installation. Here are two screenshots showing the installation of an unsigned extension: So, are you really sure that signature checking stuff has been removed? In any case, I cannot confirm this statement. AstroSkipper

ROG - precisely about Asus PS/2 Keyboard/Mouse combo port. "I have purchased 6 PS/2 Y splitter..." https://rog-forum.asus.com/t5/z170/ps-2-keyboard-mouse-combo-port/td-p/574618

That's terrible news ! You both stay strong ! Try not to breathe the same air. Very important to not touch your face with your hands, wash them often. I hope she'll get better ! How do they know she has covidium ? Was it official ? Did she see a doctor ?

Concerning Mediamarkt, that is also discussed at the official Pale moon forum: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=30114&p=241764.

@a8s If you're going to use a hack like this, you should also read the notes. Here is a quotation taken from the creator's notes: And if you had carried out a new installation straight away from scratch, as I advised you to do in this post, you would have immediately realised that the error was in your configuration.

After installing the latest cumulative update for Canary, File Explorer and Context menu changed to the Windows 10 versions.

And remember that Windows 8 has no telemetry.

No I actually prefer ESR versions. They stay with the same feature set, and userChrome.css changes to the UI are set. Otherwise, I'd have to make changes every three weeks. Plus I'm staying on Windows 8 for the meantime, not Windows 8.1

I've often wondered the same. It's not like I've ever walked into a bank to open a new account and told them, "I will not open an account here if you enable members to use XP."

Mypal 68.13.5b does not recognise the system proxy settings under Windows XP which have been set in the proxy settings of IE 8 although the option Use system proxy settings under Network Settings is enabled. I tested this with ProxHTTPSProxy. Can anyone confirm this?

I's start with trying to set the full RGB mode. Perhaps something had messed up this setting when you reinstalled the driver.

A tab crash for latest compil, under xp 64. Hopefully we get a x64 version next time.

Not all 109 versions work. The later "final releases" - don't. Tht last working one was 109.0. 53.97, if I'm not mistaken. Some kind fella created a list of the last versions in the last win 7 soft topic. Some manufacturers stopped even at 108 or so.

I didn't get them too. I told myself they would have to force my home with special ops, and even then I'll not surrender.

Dear legacyfan, please show where exactly you say I accused you of instagramifying ? I meant (maybe) you had brought up the discussion about GF by weirdly mentioning your PC along with the holiday of the lovers, so one could easily assume it was a present from your lover, I already wrote - I'm sorry several times.

Your choice, but you don't have to announce it to either of us, otherwise it would be in the style of twitter, and you were allegedly not happy with it in the first place, lol. Also, if you go down that road, you'll be doomed to encounter this in the nearest future. https://msfn.org/board/topic/182193-the-msfn-café-a-penny-for-your-thoughts/?do=findComment&comment=1234400

Good morning to you too, jaclaz, always a pleasure to hear from you ! Sorry for the huge delay, I don't visit this topic often.

These two functions basically serve the same purpose. But there's a difference regarding their proper usage. A browser doesn't need the "EX" one, I'm not sure why the chinese fella added it . The standard Chrome/Opera doesn't use it . See what I mean ? I recommend not using NtOpenKeyEx, even if it's available because it needs to be linked dynamically, not statically, and if it isn't, then either use NtCreateKey if possible, or use Wow6432Node otherwise.

I'm myself not interested in this chinese browser , but for those who , you may replace NtOpenKeyEx with NtCreateKey. It's basically the same. I'm not sure why that chinese developer chose to use it, especially if the name somewhat suggests "XP" compatibility. They sure do have their own view on logic.

No, it doesn't , it's fake news. It throws an error about missing functions. And yes, I used the latest October kernel.

Now also got the download section to work, short version of the settings pages also, VPN works. @win32,the full version of settings still crashes. Otherwise the browser is pretty much stable and usable, since the flags section is available. And it is very fast, even on the ancient system from 2009.

I don't do plain chrome patching, not interested in it, sorry. I mostly patch Opera and similar. But I sent the instructions on what needs to be done to the creator of the ex-kernel for Vista @win32, and it will be implemented in the new kernel, so you all will be able to use the new Opera and Chrome. From what I see, no one's gonna do anything for windows 7.There's only talk, talk and talk.

I have no words ! But it was quite expectable, really . It all began a long time ago , when France started to let them in . Then numerous bombings "happened" , then thousands of churches "went on fire by themselves" , like Notre-Dame de Paris . And now it will have an African galleries or smth like that . Is that true ??? Geeez ! We still have an alien police force , but I don't think it will help much since the direction is almost the same here. Things aren't good here too , my friend just closed his shop . I lost my job because they hired an immigrant from Eastern Europe , who agreed to work for much less. But I beleive we are still somewhat holding on only because of our Royal Family . I don't think all of that you see in your country would've happened if France still had their Royal Family present. Vive la France !

Those are the benefits of living with your mother. xD

Did you choose this case voluntarily ?

Yes , 64 bit . I thought perhaps you could install x64 . It's better than nothing after all. Actually , you need to slipstream it with Nlite and choose "TXT mode" driver only . It worked for me , and I don't like to complicate things .

I'm sorry , I can't/shan't do it , I'm very overloaded with the real life lately . Besides , using win2000 for the internet these days isn't a good idea , just sayin'. Not because of the "viruses" , it's more like you won't be able to use decent browsers . 360EE maybe ... and that's it.

So it's just like I said . Why do you need articles then ? Would be faster to try it yourself . Just replace the OS string and install . Create a backup , of course . I told ya it would work . It's not a video driver after all. BTW, there are Nvidia drivers for 2000 available , up to GTX 780 , modded of course .

Yes , true . I wouldn't do it now . A NOTE . In the channel I provided , their Iguana has a broken nose . That may happen when they walk right throuh an object during the mating season , a wall , a window ! Just watch the videos , they will tell about that . Also , mine is bigger , theirs is only five - six years old or so and mine is 17.

It would be better to use XP drivers released before sp1. Gives you a higher chance.

Did you try inf-modding ? XP drivers should work on 2000 and vice versa .

Yep , thought so , but honestly I think it has nothing to do with our pretty similar quad CPUs , I'll try to test with a Pentium for that exact socket , which I recently bought for 5 euros , lol. I will test with the same amount of RAM (DDR3 16GB).

Geez , coders these days .... a couple gigs of super fast DDR3 RAM just to read some text !