Leaderboard

Perhaps better to ask him there https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues win32 is not here often.

Very true, and I should have noted that membership is required to view the content originally, and have done so now. I don't want to minimize @wkeller's work in any way (he is also a member here) so I won't copy the post here, but I will give you a teaser by listing all of the various browsers mentioned in that post. You'll need to either look them up yourself or sign up and go to the post I linked to above for the links (xxxxxxx) to the download locations. As far as being actively updated, he has already added the SRWare Iron links I sent him and posted here earlier. So here are all of the Windows 7 compatible browsers I am aware of, thanks to @wkeller ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Firefox fully supports Windows 7 until September 2024 (xxxxxxx), so you can download any version before that date. The newest version at the time of writing is v115.3 ESR and it can be updated automatically. In case of Chromium based browsers, you should download any version with engine v109 or earlier or use new Supermium or Google Chrome crack projects. Chrome xxxxxxx - latest 32-bit version. xxxxxxx - latest 64-bit version. If you want to install it for all users (ie. system level) read --> xxxxxxx. For latest Chrome Enterprise version look --> xxxxxxx. Chromium and Ungoogled Chromium 64 bit: xxxxxxx 32 bit: xxxxxxx 64 bit and 32 bit: xxxxxxx Ungoogled Chromium 64 bit: xxxxxxx 32 bit: xxxxxxx Brave xxxxxxx Vivaldi Snapshot (latest): xxxxxxx 64 bit (stable): xxxxxxx 32 bit (stable): xxxxxxx Opera 64 bit: xxxxxxx 32 bit: xxxxxxx Edge Latest v109 (for WinServer 2012 but working on Win7): xxxxxxx 64 bit (v109.0.1518.78 for Win7): xxxxxxx 32 bit (v109.0.1518.78 for Win7): xxxxxxx Evergreen WebView2 (It is not browser but edge/chromium engine, used by some apps internally.) Last stable version (for Win7) --> xxxxxxx Latest version (for WinSever 2012 but should be working on Win7): --> xxxxxxx Supermium The aim of Supermium is to provide the latest Chromium features, support for rendering the web and security patches to users of Windows 7 32/64 bit: xxxxxxx Google Chrome crack - Windows 7 This is workaround to launch latest Google Chrome or Opera on Windows 7. 32/64-bit: xxxxxxx Catsxp Chinese Chromium based browser, compatible with Windows 7 32/64 bit: xxxxxxx Yandex Russian browser based on Blink engine and Chromium project, that still supports Windows 7. 32/64 bit: xxxxxxx Thorium Another Chromium fork that still provides Windows 7 releases. Info site: xxxxxxx Releases (32/64 bit) xxxxxxx Cent Browser Another Chromium fork that uses older engine and still works on Windows 7. 32/64 bit: xxxxxxx Slimjet Fastest web browser that automatically blocks ads (based on Chromium). 32/64 bit: xxxxxxx SRWare Iron Yet another Chromium fork with Windows 7 support - installer and portable. 32/64-bit: https://www.srware.net/downloads/win7.html Firefox ESR (last for Win7): xxxxxxx SlimFirefox These are just settings to slim down Firefox and improve its privacy, designed to use with latest version. Available --> xxxxxxx. Firefox forks (or browsers based on Mozilla engine) There are also Firefox forks that will probably never drop Win7 support in foreseeable future. Palemoon: xxxxxxx Basilisk: xxxxxxx Waterfox: xxxxxxx Waterfox Classic: xxxxxxx SeaMonkey: xxxxxxx LibreWolf: xxxxxxx K-Meleon: xxxxxxx SlimBrowser: xxxxxxx There are even forks compatible with Windows XP. xxxxxxx Other Browsers Maxthon Hong Kong browser, based on Chromium. xxxxxxx Falkon Falkon is a KDE web browser using QtWebEngine rendering engine. xxxxxxx Midori xxxxxxx Cheers and Regards

Yep! FYI, if you want to discuss modifications, changes, corrections, or anything else related to legacy extensions for UXP browsers more deeply, then you can transfer your discussion about it to my thread Extensions and custom buttons for UXP browsers - Corrections, modifications, adjustments, and special recommendations, only if wanted, of course. That thread was created by me especially for this purpose. In the first post of my thread, you will find more information about it. However, @roytam1's thread here actually aims more at his browser editions, related issues, and rather rarely extensions. Anyway! Talking about legacy extensions here is not totally off-topic, either. Greetings, AstroSkipper

I actually read that topic before posting, did you? There's no such question asked there, no mentions of the possibility the OP of this topic wrote. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/29

I'd want to see full portability, like they achieved in the ungoogled version, I'll then write a new loader app.

Yes, I read too, could he be spoofing the UA?

Strange it says it's running on Win10, people on his github page wrote Supermium shows your true OS.

it is too late to be in my builds this week. and for android removal will need extra works here, since there is more remnants about android in my tree.

Update notification! Malware Hunter has been updated on 18.09.2023 and is now available in version 1.172.0.790. It is still listed to be compatible with Windows XP. Accordingly, I will update my article as soon as I can confirm its XP-compatibility. Cheers, AstroSkipper

Agreed !!! Us XP users should be sticking together !!! The "tiresome" part of this thread is that non-XP users are CONTROLLING the "narrative" !!! And we "should not" enable that to go on by a Band Of Brothers mindset of going around "liking" anything and everything for the sake of "liking" anything and everything. Just my opinion, of course. Okay, let's resume from where I left off. I have an XP-era laptop with three XP x86 partitions. I've placed Kaspersky on one partition, Panda on a second, I'm seeking suggestions for which anti-virus to be placed on that third partition.

Unfortunately Dark Magic got deprioritised now that Windows Canary is requiring taskbar rewrite

Please accept my congratulations on this wonderful 20 years jubilee!

I have a (huge) lot of FF/NM's backups, starting from 3.6.28 times. And all the installed add-ons are unpacked. So I did search all files 'chrome.manifest' containing 'content '. Total 98 add-ons found. All entries are structured as content [add-on nickname] [value]. Typical values are: jar:chrome/[bla-bla-bla].jar!/[*] content/ content/[bla-bla-bla]/ chrome/content/ chrome/content/[bla-bla-bla]/ chrome/[bla-bla-bla]/content/ Rare but functioning values are: ./ chrome/ Unusual and non-functioning value, present only in Norwell, is: / The next question is - why slash works within archive and do not work in directory? Is it somehow connected with WXP rules that treats slashes? I think that it is within a step to off-topic. But just now the question is about why/how WXP behaves differently, including possible influence of some long-lasting FF/PM/NM unZIP-on-the-fly library. This version is not mentioned in http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=2860307 Is there any source that can be recomended to JustOff to include in CAA?

I feel like a goof, but I'm glad bphlpt helped you! Be advised, I think you need to listen to him, Iron is a lot better (not only because it's German, no). It simply more privacy oriented. And be advised Brave leaks DNS servers https://community.brave.com/t/brave-leaking-dns-servers/191002

Cordial congrats and best wishes.

Absolutely agree, indeed a good browser. I trust it and even use it for banking, Made in Germany.

Months ago, I installed and checked 360 Total Security from Qihoo in the version 10.8.0.1541, which I didn't like, though. I wrote about it in the old antivirus thread. Now, there is a brand new version available, 360 Total Security 11.0.0.1042. Maybe, this one? In any case, it has a real-time protection function and is still listed to be compatible with Windows XP. But, be attentive during installation to deselect what you don't want, if that's possible!

That shouldn't really be the case, and I'm sorry about that, but I'm trying to prevent any misunderstandings, given the posts here. It is of course clear that Malwarebytes is no longer interested in old versions. They want to leave the era of Windows XP and Vista behind. If you have read my old posts about how I was treated in the Malwarebytes forum as a Windows XP user, especially by their moderators, there is no need for any further explanation. But there was also a small glimmer of hope where an ordinary member had apologised to me for his behaviour.

Apparently someone has modified those drivers for Windows 7 and the are supposed to work on 8.1 too. https://winraid.level1techs.com/t/intel-uhd-graphics-630-video-driver-for-win7-x64/33098/353?u=moline I know nothing about them so use on your own risk.

That's right. A self-protection function of an antimalware programme is actually a good thing, but it can also cause problems. Especially if you uninstall it. I have experienced this several times.

Chrome doesn't require those to be installed to run on any versions of Windows 10.

I was only able to find their code to build by yourself, I guess it won't suffice.

I don't receive any new Kstub log entries. I also never succeeded in assigning an API. Nothing happens, if I try to make a new bookmark. There's no window "New Bookmark" or "Page Bookmarked". The window "Edit Bookmark" appears, if the bookmark exists. Old problem from 2011 - never really completely fixed. I don't know, whether the culprit is still in it: https://sourceforge.net/p/kernelex/feature-requests/7/

Try to add this secret flag to reduce the number of draw processes. Starts faster with it. --disable-features=EnableDrDc

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20230204-485bba73-uxp-a234f6917-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20230204-485bba73-uxp-a234f6917-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20230204-id-656ea98-uxp-a234f6917-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20230204-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-a234f6917-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20230128-485bba73-uxp-fd45d6324-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20230128-485bba73-uxp-fd45d6324-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20230128-id-656ea98-uxp-fd45d6324-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20230128-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-fd45d6324-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

@Sampei.Nihira, Which browser is that you are using above?

Thought so.

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20230121-485bba73-uxp-cad030d6c-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20230121-485bba73-uxp-cad030d6c-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20230121-id-656ea98-uxp-cad030d6c-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20230121-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-cad030d6c-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20230114-485bba73-uxp-12b3c5e5f-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20230114-485bba73-uxp-12b3c5e5f-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20230114-id-656ea98-uxp-12b3c5e5f-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20230114-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-12b3c5e5f-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20230107-485bba73-uxp-7ecc55be2-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20230107-485bba73-uxp-7ecc55be2-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20230107-id-656ea98-uxp-7ecc55be2-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20230107-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-7ecc55be2-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20221231-485bba73-uxp-120ac6d55-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20221231-485bba73-uxp-120ac6d55-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20221231-id-656ea98-uxp-120ac6d55-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20221231-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-120ac6d55-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20221224-485bba73-uxp-5e9f3d066-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20221224-485bba73-uxp-5e9f3d066-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20221224-id-656ea98-uxp-5e9f3d066-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20221224-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-5e9f3d066-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

I was just curious because he didn't say was it x64 or x86 Vista. (The behaviour might differ!) I ask any type of on-topic questions I want, and you don't have to comment on everything, lol. I obviously don't have to explain anything to you, I do this only because I consider myself to be polite and of good manners.

This is an Older NT-Family OSes discussion. As such, there will always be a LAG with "cutting edge". Basically, "we don't care" about the LAG being YEARS. We have our JUSTIFIABLE reasons for using Older NT-Family OSes. I'd still be using Opera 10, if it worked ! And I did - 'till the end. BTW, I don't know how modern Chrome looks on XP, but it still looks the same on Vista (with aero), and it all that matters. So why not use it ? I don't want to get into arguments, but obviously we use a different set of websites. You of all know, I loved this browser when it made sense for me.

What about RAM ? Also amost 1GB with an emply page too ? PS. You need this update for DX11 (Windows6.0-KB971512) on Vista for all these to work, it's achievable. I just turn it off intentionally. I only use hardware Skia. Also, you would need to force gpu usage via flags, but the ones you already used is a good start. Check if your chrome runs an additional GPU process.

92 ?! What good would it be ? It's outdated by ages now, and isn't even finished ! I also have my doubts , will it ever be ? I read about 102, but it's also more than 7-8 months old. Don't forget, the current us Chrome 111. https://www.reddit.com/r/windowsxp/comments/vgwnaw/chrome_102_now_works_on_windows_xp/

Looks like a joke or an error . When I bought one of my Vista PCs in 2009 it came with DDR3 already. At it was not an ultra gaming PC. Absolutely not. Do you and the others started to think what's next ? Maybe start do dig another newer browser for XP ?

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20221217-485bba73-uxp-4ea078d68-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20221217-485bba73-uxp-4ea078d68-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20221217-id-656ea98-uxp-4ea078d68-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20221217-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-4ea078d68-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

We now have a very special section for super funny jokes like this one. https://msfn.org/board/topic/184217-welcome-to-joke-central-the-lol-corner-of-the-forum/

ESENT has been around since Windows 2000 through Windows 11. Maybe this will help explain ESENT, and convince you that it is both not "junk" and also useful. From https://www.minitool.com/news/esent.html: What Is ESENT? --------------- What is ESENT? ESENT is an embeddable transactional database engine. It was first provided with Microsoft Windows 2000 and has been available to developers since then. You can use ESENT for applications that require reliable, high-performance, and low-overhead structured or semi-structured data storage. The ESENT engine can meet a variety of data requirements, from simple data like hash tables to data that cannot be stored in memory to more complex data (such as applications with tables, columns, and indexes). Now, many teams at Microsoft currently rely on ESENT for data storage, such as Active Directory, Windows Desktop Search, Windows Mail, Live Mesh, and Windows Update. Besides, Microsoft Exchange uses a slightly modified version of the ESENT code to store all its mailbox data.

I was going to agree with @UCyborg I'm not sure how XP does it, but for my Win 7 system, I'll have one instance of explorer.exe for the desktop, then another for each instance of Windows Explorer I open. But since it hasn't happened again, then maybe it was just a glitch, so never mind. Cheers and Regards

Windows Vista SP1 is very fast too , at least for me.

Yes , you're right . I just thought it was necesary to tag a supervisor so he could intervene and keep this topic clean , also add a function where one could be able to block members . Besides , I've already asked a user (not pointing fingers at anyone) to stop disturbing win32 and me with longish texts containing the same questions over again . Please tell , is there a "block user" function over here ? I can see only "ignore" , but that isn't helping.

I wanna back with @dencorso . I can go a long way describing the ugliest things that 21st century has brought. But I guess that makes no sense, since you most likely don't remember the 20th. I totally agree with him about "oversensitive generation" , I have a girlfriend , almost 20 years yonger than me , and she is so oversensitive , oh boy . Literally about everything that previous generations wouldn't even notice . But you're right , we should keep this topic clean , so I'll refrain from it . I'm just saying that your "solution" is not working in my case (but @dencorso is right again , you shouldn't delete , it could be somewhat useful to others), and the instructions that were given by our guru @win32 (local , no updates after April 2017 , etc ) are 100% bullet proof. By the way , how things are going under this "virus" "lockdown" in your favourite 21st century ? (rhetorical question) "lockdown" is a prison term , but that seems to be ok with most of young people/millenials ?! (rhetorical too) Rhetorical means you don't have to write an answer , so I'm not waiting for one . I really hope you'll keep in balance after reading this, please don't get nervous.

Hi , I'd like to add . All versions starting from Opera 69 do NOT remember extensions' settings . They revert all settings to default if the browser is re-launched. Chromium is even worse . It simply turns them off (tested on chrome 86). I mean the extensions without locale settings , which I managed to install.