Leaderboard

No, I tried, it doesn't.

Chrome doesn't require those to be installed to run on any versions of Windows 10.

I wrote: @anton12 "Try additionally" doesn't mean that my provided SSUAO is required. When I checked your problematic website, I tested first a SSUAO without the string Goanna which sometimes causes troubles when loading certain websites. And my provided SSUAO doesn't harm, then it doesn't really matter. Use the native one or any other! The main thing is that the website works with it.

I didn't know they made 360EE v114, obviously doesn't work on XP?

Cool! Thank you for the link!

https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/2023/09/2023-09-26-09-27-49-mozilla-central/ (this is the latest, at the time of this writing) From the above link, choose win64.zip version.

https://auf1.tv/das-grosse-interview/kickl-weidel-wende-zum-guten-wird-ein-harter-kampf Hello mina7601, You can play that above Auf1.tv video with St52 plus eMatrix using the settings of AstroSkipper - for me it works perfectly without SSUAO for St52: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.0; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Goanna/4.8 Firefox/102.0 Basilisk/52.9.0 Here you can get eMatrix: https://addons.basilisk-browser.org/addon/ematrix/ Here are AstroSkipper's settings for eMatrix:

Agreed! Thank you, thank you, thank you!

Please don't bring politics here, and just so you know, EU is stronger than ever, and America is very well united in banning Kaspersky, in case you missed, you may familiarise yourself with the article I posted about that matter. That said, I hope we leave aside the "dead horse kaspersky" and move on! We are waiting when you gift us with the update to 360 Explorer on the 95th engine.

Currently, Windows 8.1 can run the latest version (119). Since 120 Nightly will be released tomorrow, I think it will run as well. It‘s going to be the fifth post-EOL version to run on 8.1

Any, and by any I mean any, AV has a built-in self protection, self preservation mechanism from malicious attempts of breaking it, but I don't have to tell you that, do I? So, maybe also try to compare the modified (even slightly, even one bit) versions of them both, to see how they will behave?

I made a post which exposed Kaspersky collaboration with FSB, with links provided, it gets immediately deleted! There was nothing political in it, just facts.

are you sure? don't believe the truth Net Framework 4.8 can be installed on 1511 / 10586

It is done.

I too have this question! It seems odd. First they write they stay on older OS to be less spied on, second they port the standard Chrome/chromium, really odd.

New "merchandise API" block https://msfn.org/board/topic/184249-chrome-110-based-opera-i-ported-it-to-vista/?do=findComment&comment=1249504

Yes, I meant if his firm paid for non-cheapo LTBG licences, why wouldn't they simply demand moneyback, if they ignore reports, lol. I mean, it should work with official software, period!

Hello @Saxon! As I already wrote here, users reported in the Comodo Forum that the last error-free working version under Windows XP has been Comodo Firewall 8.4.0.5165. Have you really tried this version? Actually, it should work under Windows XP.

Thank you, interesting observations. I am of the same opinion, it was fine up to 2015. I wonder if upgrading even makes sense.

Dear Gawd, I've been looking for this for centuries! It allowed me to use +480megs on my 32bit OS, many thanks!

Hi @AstroSkipperand all others, sorry for the delays, despite what they say about 8.xxx to be the last for XP, I have only been able to use Comodo 5.xxx and 6.xxx under XP. Newer versions simply didn't work good for me, despite what they say! I even had missing icons! As you may see on the screen, 5.5 works, but modern programmes have no problems to just go through it! When checking for updates, for example. Conclusions: I do not recommend the 5.xxx range for the modern days usage, It's simply too old. I'll go on with the investigations.

From my research, WD is simply not capable to produce disks of any capacity above 6TB. I have WD60EFAX (6TB SMR), it's fine, despite the new not so popular SMR tech. It's still too new to tell about the longevity.

Recently got myself a rebranded WD (previously made by Hitachi), it's of course identical, 10TB WD 7200rpm. Very Noisy! Looks like it has "smart defrag" made by the device. I'm not happy with the purchase at all. Full specs: HGST WD Ultrastar DC HC510 10TB 7200 RPM SATA 6Gb/s 3.5" Helium Platform Enterprise Hard Disk Drive - HUH721010ALE604 (0F27606) Price approx 250-300 Euros.

They definitely don't, while the older ones can have troubles with mixed content on pages. Is this the case? Did you check all connections on that page? Do you use adblock? And check whether it could also be a remote font issue.

Single-process mode is very important, IMHO. The only mode I use.

I agree wholeheartedly. Besides New Moon 28 and Serpent 52/55, Mypal 68 is another perfect browser for older operating systems. @feodor2 has definitely done a great job.

BTW, turning off Windows XP Firewall is not necessarily needed. Just for testing purpose! Generally, it should work with Windows XP Firewall enabled. But you have to allow connections of IE and Proxy's PopMenu in your firewall, of course. TBH, it was a labyrinth at the time when we were solving all related problems to get it work. But now, it's just a problem of proper configuration. So, not really an abstract labyrinth anymore here! You do not have to be a Maze Runner.

Yes, this flag makes the white pages dark, yes, this is the one, you're right.

But why ? It works this weird way without extensions installed. I only have uBlock 1.4. And then again, why only them are not normal ? Perhaps their picture format is not decoded properly ?

Thank you , friend. As I wrote everything's fine on 360 Explorer for me also. The problem started to appear with a newer chrome only.

It's server based on Win7, I never cloned win 7 , sorry. And Vista/Server 2008 should have BOOTSECT.BAK on C.

Old browsers work fine, including MiniBrowser 87.0.4280.66. Everything newer, like chrome 100 - this same behaviour.

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20221112-485bba73-uxp-f9dc0e6d1-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20221112-485bba73-uxp-f9dc0e6d1-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20221112-id-656ea98-uxp-f9dc0e6d1-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20221112-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-f9dc0e6d1-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20221105-485bba73-uxp-fe4859b2c-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20221105-485bba73-uxp-fe4859b2c-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20221105-id-656ea98-uxp-fe4859b2c-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20221105-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-fe4859b2c-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20221029-485bba73-uxp-a6338caef-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20221029-485bba73-uxp-a6338caef-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20221029-id-656ea98-uxp-a6338caef-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20221029-id-656ea98-ia-93af9a0-uxp-a6338caef-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

I am talking about downloading a release from the assets on GitHub. Worked fine with palefill 1.21 the last time in the latest release of New Moon 28. I did not say anything about ZIPs from the repos.

Hello @mockingbird! The last time I downloaded files from GitHub all was fine with palefill 1.21 installed. I do not use the WC polyfill add-on from JustOff anymore. Kind regards, AstroSkipper

Thank you , duly noted.

Thanks , I have the tools , also I keep the caps in a fridge , not the main fridge , of course , lol . I heard this before , does it really help ? I have plenty of new mobos and other parts in original boxes , can't imagine to turn them on regularly ...

Yes , a good idea , I think I'll do that , I still have plenty of German and Dutch caps from the 80's/90's.

Thank you ! This all we have (available right now) from seasonics here . Usually it is much more , but now kinda limited due to [insert any "reason" from the news]. I want something between 700 - 800W, so I removed all lower models from the text. Remember I have a GPU that cooks very well , lol. it needs 275W-300W alone. Seasonic G12 GC-750 80+ Gold 750 Watt Seasonic B12 BC-850 80+ Bronze 850 Watt Seasonic G12 GC-850 80+ Gold 850 Watt Seasonic FOCUS-GX-750 750W Seasonic Focus GX-850 80+ Gold 850 Watt Seasonic Focus PX-750 80+ Platinum 750 Watt Seasonic Focus PX 750 750 Watt Seasonic PRIME GX-750 750 Watt Seasonic Connect 750 Modular (80+Gold) 750 Watt Seasonic Focus PX-850 80+ Platinum 850 Watt Seasonic PRIME PX-750 750 Watt Seasonic FOCUS-GX-1000 (80+Gold) 1000 Watt Seasonic PRIME GX-850 850 Watt Seasonic PRIME GX-1000 1000 Watt Seasonic PRIME TX-750 750 Watt Seasonic PRIME PX-850 850 Watt Seasonic Prime Snow Silent 80 Plus Titanium 750 Watt Seasonic Prime-TX-700 Fanless (80+Titanium) 700 Watt Seasonic PRIME PX-1000 1000 Watt Seasonic PRIME TX-850 850 Watt Seasonic Prime Ultra 1300 Gold (80+Gold) 1300 Watt Seasonic Prime Ultra 1300 Platinum (80+Platinum) 1300 Watt Seasonic PRIME TX-1000 1000 Watt

@TrevMUN, thank you for the article , what is the best PSU to buy in advance for at least several years ahead ? I want to buy several. Preferably without LED lights and without paint coating . We've got a wide range to choose from here. The problem is they all look like chinese crap to me. I was quite satisfied with FSP (Fujitsu Siemens Power) 700W , but they don't make them anymore.