Leaderboard

Greetings back! I meant the homepage onlyfans.com and their contained links. They work with ProxyMII in New Moon 28, but not in 360Chrome.

Sorry for the delayed response, for me onlyfans.com works fine in 360Chrome, but only if I don't use the proxy connection. I don't use it anyway unless I have to, as it slows things down considerably. It's mainly used with Internet Explorer and my e-mail client, which uses the IE engine to display messages.

Back on topic please guys, this is not a thread about the price of computer hardware.

I already predicted it would have happened (link), I'm not surprised, even though folks wrote their chrome still worked on the old Win 10 at that time. So looks like now 1809 is the new bare minimum, link. And like I said before. the whole memory function would have to be replaced to be able to run on such old versions, link. This would explain the delays with the Chinese forks of Chrome for Win 7. Each new release will be harder and harder to port, so build from scratch is the only method left. As you all see, I could be the new clairvoyant, in addition to @D.Draker, I think I don't even have to mention, @jaclaz's half-functional (maintenance mode?) crystal ball is already mine.

The best site [in my opinion] to check. https://browserleaks.com/javascript

There is a solution to the ProtonMail problem! The account login problem is only with old mailboxes (created around 2016-2018 or something like that, you can read on their blog). The thing is, all old mailboxes were previously encrypted with RSA (2048) 4096-bit keys, and now, all new mailboxes are encrypted with ECC Curve25519. For some reason, the latest versions of Serpent - cannot work properly with the RSA (2048) 4096-bit key. While earlier versions (20230715) - work fine. To make the latest Serpent versions work with old mailboxes, you need to enter the settings - "Encryption and keys" and generate new ECC Curve25519 keys. Now there are no problems with logging into your account (Serpent_20230826). At least everything works fine for me. ------------------------

Warmest greetings ; when you wrote that, did you actually mean just the OF homepage? As I have already demonstrated in a previous post in this thread , individual OF posts like httpS://onlyfans.com/693430760/onlyfans have trouble loading fully in browsers via a ProxHTTPSProxy MITM connection, because the websockets secure protocol (wss://*) is being used and the secure proxy doesn't support it ; @cmalex has acknowledged that and confessed his inability to "fix" it: Again, "we" need a very experienced/skillful Python coder to edit the original proxy script in order for that support to be added... I also tried whitelisting the wss protocol in the proxy's config.ini: [BYPASS URL] http://* +wss://* but no change was observed: (St52 is the browser used...) ... I'm posting this right now in St52 via referenced ProxyMII version (its Python modified to be compatible with Vista SP2 ) and I'm not experiencing "considerable" slowdown myself , on any site; just the expected 1-2s for the "proxy" to populate its window; nothing more... Best regards ...

Thanks for your reply! However, the intention of my post was to clarify that the onlyfans.com website can be accessed without problems via ProxHTTPSProxy. The fact that this does not work with 360Chrome is a problem with this browser itself. Furthermore, I personally didn't observe a noticeable slowdown when accessing onlyfans.com via the new version of ProxHTTPSProxy (ProxyMII dated from 13.08.2023) in New Moon 28. And my Windows XP computer is very old and slow. BTW, I also use ProxHTTPSProxy under Windows XP only when necessary.

It was always the case, and it goes like this for ages, newer drivers are better optimized fir newer card generations, I'd say the drivers are good usually up to 3 years from the initial card release. Then they just don't care about your relic and move on.

My car is 32 years old. Not a single solitary spot of rust! I do firmly support the notion of "if you take care of it, it will last forever". My kids are the same way! They may have phones that are SEVERAL times older than their friends's phones. But my kids's phone have no scratches, don't even have "screen protectors". Because if you know how to TAKE CARE OF THINGS, they will last a long time. But there also has to be a sense of realism - and sorry, expecting a 20yr old computer to compete with a 5yr old computer is not realistic. But I also must admit, neither is my 32yr old car "for most people". People drive like MANIACS and falsely think that "green means gun it", it doesn't "green means go".

Basically any decent. quality 450W should be enough for something with Kabylake and a 7 years old GTX1050, because they are designed to draw much less power.

No. The Toshiba Satellite C55D-B5244 ($469.99 as tested) is a budget ... https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/toshiba-satellite-c55d-b5244

They suggest to run chrome exe in Vista compatibility, tick the checkbox for Run this program in compatibility mode for, select Windows Vista from the drop-down menu, and then click OK https://windowsreport.com/chrome-white-screen/

Okay, knew it was something I had to tweak, this was the fix: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/outlook-stops-connecting-on-windows-7-and-legacy-windows-versions-55263b47-921b-4ed8-98fd-c90fb326379c Applied this via Group Policy to all machines so I never have to worry about this again!

Hello @Dave-H! I tested again the website onlyfans.com. I found out that the problem to access this site via proxy doesn't seem related to ProxHTTPSProxy but rather to the 360Chrome browser. When accessing this site in the latest releases (I tested the last two ones) of New Moon 28, there is no problem. New Moon 28 works much better with this site than 360Chrome. onlyfans.com loads very quickly natively, and no problems via ProxHTTPSProxy in this browser, either. You no longer have to enter this website under [SSL Pass-Thru]. BTW, it doesn't matter whether you use the latest or the previous version of ProxHTTPSProxy. If you ever have time, you can try this out. Since I don't use this website and don't have an account, maybe you can also try a login via New Moon 28. In my system, the website runs great in New Moon 28, in 360 Chrome unfortunately terribly with long loading times on my old computer. And via ProxHTTPSProxy, it doesn't really run in 360Chrome, strangely enough. Something in the connection check is blocked then. Cheers, AstroSkipper

5TB HDD is itself strange, looks like it's an outsorted 6TB, with a damaged platter, reduced to 5TB with its firmware. It's nothing new, it had been done before.

It depends on what you consider old. I perfectly remember those limited crappy Seagate (in cheap-n-ugly plastic boxes) external storage units with that precise limit. Made somewhere in 2015 (2014?). Almost a decade ago. It tried to put a 8TB HDD (somewhere in 2018) into that box, instead of the unsurprisingly failed Seagate crap, and it showed as 5TB only. Maybe, just maybe the OP was granted with that cheap chip they used in the crappy Seagate?

Thank you very much for the link! I don't have that exact card, but the driver also works with other Xonar series cards, just need to replace the device ID, a very good driver, indeed!

At least im not the only one with the same opinion!

Hi @Dave-H, try this site to see all ciphers classified due to its TLS version: https://browserleaks.com/ssl Here is a screenshot of Iceape-UXP accessing browserleaks.com using its native TLS protocol (max. TLS 1.3): There you can see which TLS version is currently used and its ciphers. You can clearly realize that exactly three ciphers are relating to TLS 1.3: - TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0x1301) - TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (0x1303) - TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (0x1302) Here is a screenshot of Iceape-UXP accessing browserleaks.com using ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e: And these three mentioned TLS 1.3 related ciphers are obviously not present in ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e. @heinoganda added a lot of TLS 1.2 ciphers I have never seen before, but unfortunately no ciphers relating to TLS 1.3 protocol. My conclusion: ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e contains openssl-1.1.1d including support for TLS 1.3, but the TLS 1.3 related ciphers have to be added or implemented by a person with Python programming skills yet. So we need a programmer as it was @heinoganda in the past. Cheers, AstroSkipper

My apologies @VistaLover, I've just realised that I never responded to this! I did try this out, and the answer (in IE8) on TLS 1.3 was 'no' I'm afraid. Is there something else that needs to be configured, I wonder?

No more of this here please or I will put my moderator's hat on! I wanted to ask, as the main reason to use ProxHTTPSProxyMII Rev3e is that it apparently supports TLS 1.3, is there any way of confirming that this is working? I've tried a few test sites, but the results are inconclusive.

I think the documentation is absolutely fine. My only very minor observation is that the installation instruction implied (at least to me!) that you have to copy the whole program folder to your desired location, keeping the same folder name. That isn't the case of course, you can just copy the sub-folders and files from the folder to a new folder with a different name, and it still works fine. Being very picky here I realise!

Hello again, my dear beta testers, @Dave-H, @NotHereToPlayGames, @mina7601 and @xpandvistafan, thanks for testing so far! Please try out all features in different locations to be sure it is working in all cases as expected! You all are appreciated and any opinion or suggestion is welcome! Thanks for your previous feedback! I am really happy so far. Cheers, AstroSkipper

I have updated package and therefore the old one had to be deleted on MediaFire. I thought you (all) already dowloaded the package and fixed files, therefore the old package was obsolete. Do you have all files?

I second that, it's all working very well, and the menu looks great!

So you decided not to go that route ? BTW , I'm just curious why XP boots OK ?

Where's the Downvote button ? Why , did you enjoy the punctuation or grammatical errors ? Have you tried these drivers yourself ? I think I read somewhere that you have a Haswell notebook. I still hope to put mine into usage with Vista or [at least] XP.

Guys , please don't go off-topic , This topic is about ex-kernel , not laptops , thanks. I'm sure you can find "PC that is capable of running Vista" topic on this forum too.

First off , you need to run the installer as admin , mine works OK

Yes , this may very well be true . I would strongly advise against replacing it , esp. for those who love HD content. As you all know , Win 7 is just so much worse in terms of h264 files playback , and pretty much everything else. They look washed out , pale , etc. And for those who simply can't live without firefox, why not do it locally ?

Care to say what caused it ? Cause mine works just fine , thanks

Thank you very much , that's what I wanted to hear ! You sound very wise . I totally agree with you about this generations thingy , so I will assume @Jaguarek62 just overreacted a bit , I mean him being younger and stuff . I promise you , I will just ignore such things in the future.