Leaderboard

Ah, no hard feelings then.

Yes , i understand you , me I talk about the difference in size between two files different basic and rollup , you can see the blog net framework 4.0 version and size

Depending what i think the net framework which you download it from the blog is the basic version , but the rollup of 2014 is the full update this why is large in size than the blog one .

In http://www.win2k.org/wlu/wluen.htm In search box put 1.5 and 1.5b will appear to you .

It exists at the WLU site. Go to Manual Update, then write net framework in Search Keyword, this is the 1 labeled "Microsoft .Net Framework 4.0 for Extended Kernel(v2)"

this problem is because in wlu site the link to net framework 4.0 not exist download it from the blog of @blackwingcat : http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/archives/1707344.html .Net Framework 4.0 for Windows 2000 Version: 2 Date: 2023/02/16 Download: 69.4M Require: .Net Framework 2.0 SP2 use this version of wlu updator : Windows Legacy Updator for WLU File v1.5b it's better one now after these you can install rollup of net framework 4.0 without any problem

Hello, on my testing with downloading this file Chrome and Firefox, I didn't get that error message when downloading it on Chrome nor Firefox.

Add a rainmeter skin to the desktop, then right click the skin. for me the menu is white on all dark themes, If i disable dark magic, they return to dark.

you can use custom branch, unless you want to build official basilisk, which requires checking out basilisk in separated folder and link my UXP (custom-platform) as "platform" subfolder.

martok created PR, and it seems to be working fine from my testing. https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/pulls/2273

Someone tried CounterSocial? It's just sounds too good to be true! "No Trolls. No Abuse. No Ads. No Fake News. No Foreign Influence Ops." "CounterSocial states there are no ads, trolls, fake news or abuse on their platform. This social media platform is not available everywhere. Blocked countries include China, Iran and Russia, among others. CounterSocial offers news, livestreaming and the ability to create communities. Users determine the content on CounterSocial. They can also create columns on its user interface to sort posts by topics, hashtags and users. Users can share, like and comment on posts. A video chat feature is also included." https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/Best-Twitter-alternatives

if doesn't help, add the XAPOFX1_5.dl from the redist, too.

Why not? You'd need to look at the calls to system power APIs the browser makes.

Thanks again for checking and confirming! Thus, according to your observation, Malwarebytes v1.75.0.1300 is receiving definition updates again. Unbelievable! I will have to try this out at the next opportunity. Maybe, someone else here in the forum is using this version and can confirm this. I had a look at the version history of ZA and searched for announcements. The support of the Internet Protocol 6 (IPv6) seems to have been added only in the version 7.

martok further described the problem, but still no solution yet. https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/2271#issuecomment-36939

Great, hopefully it makes a difference.

Thanks I did not see that. Windows2000-KB935839-v31hM-x86-ENU.wlu Going to try it. No .net error on install. rebooting..gonna to try again. .net error on second install. I have windows 2000 on my second partition as drive D: I still cannot install .net wlu files. I'll look at the email clients...

if you want to build in-tree basilisk, use custom branch. if you want to build out-of-tree basilisk/icedove/iceape/etc., use custom-platform branch.

And even then, blackwingcat told me to not worry about the ngen.exe error when it appears, here it is. (comment number 1101)

Yes ... I should have said 'definition updates' earlier. It was dated for today July 12 ... number 4. I just ran the Malwarebytes update again and it is now - v2023.07.12.09. Some years back the definition updates stopped working for me also. I got in touch with someone at Malwarebytes and he assured me that they had not dropped support for v1.75.0.1300 ... but it just would no longer update. He worked with me for awhile but nothing worked. I would try to update a few times a month and one day after about 8 months I ran the update again and the definition update downloaded and has been downloading ever since. I made no changes to anything on my end, it just started working again. One of the 'Mysteries of the Universe' I guess ... I really wanted to keep this version on the computer so I was happy when it started working again. Thanks for the information on IPv6. I don't have a lot of knowledge on it so your explanation clears that up. I might go through the ZA version history someday and see when it was added but I'm sure the older version I'm using wouldn't have it ... as you said.

Thanks for this nice statement! And thanks for your detailed report! I asked you if you'd use the IPv6 protocol because old firewalls like Sygate or old versions of ZoneAlarm might lack of this feature. But the IPv4 protocol is no problem for them, of course. Are you still receiving most recent definition updates dated of July 2023? As far as I know, Malwarebytes stopped rolling out those updates for all versions below 3. Please be so kind and check again the date and version of your last definition updates! I tried the version 1.75.0.1300 months ago, and it didn't work for me.

Thanks for reporting! And no problem! There was no hurry. I'm afraid I can't forget that easily. I can remember very well. This antivirus feature, no one wanted to have seriously. So you still satisfied with this version in 2023, and it works as it should? Do you use the IPv6 protocol?

I'm not in the southeastern part of the US, but where I live it is hotter than usual for this time of year. My family who lives in those areas has told me that it's so hot that they basically have to stay inside 24/7, going outside for even 5 minutes is unbearable.

it should work by specifying in mozconfig: ac_add_options --enable-application=basilisk

so upstream released new version now, lets see if they hit same issue or not

alright I can reproduce a crash, and a possible fix is committed.

German brand actually made in Taiwan: https://msfn.org/board/topic/184668-refreshing-data-on-the-disk/?do=findComment&comment=1244101 @legacyfan A number of the no-name or generic adapters may have some limitations related to size of the hard disk, please note that oldish 2.5" hard disks, while they may be of smaller (and compatible) size often require more current that what a normal USB can provide, you should check the Amperes needed by the disk, a "standard" USB up to 2.0 gives 0.5A@5V, there are so-called Y-cables to connect to two USB ports (thus providing 1A@5V) that are (were) often needed: Bent pins can usually be straightened, but if you can actually insert the connector they shouldn't be bent/crooked much. The possibility of a malfunctioning (though not DOA as it initially they worked) adapters of course exists, as well it is possible that the issue is with the hard disks themselves. jaclaz

archives updated

On Windows XP, Process Explorer v16.32 works, but doesn't show the menu bar icons and graphs. Therefore, a less recent version than 16.32 will be more suitable. But unfortunately, Process Explorer doesn't have the above mentioned, additional security features of Process Hacker. BTW, I already wrote about other task managers like Process Explorer: All in terms of security programmes, of course! Process Explorer as a task manager is really good. It's portable and easy to use.

Such a startup manager, which controls all startup entries, notifies newly created one, and gives the option to block it, I also consider a security programme. So, it is already on my internal list of security programmes for Windows XP..

FileHippo used to be a good source for old programme versions. Unfortunately, that has changed. What you download there lately are only downloaders. Total crap! I have been avoiding this site for a long time.

Right! There are many cases where AV programmes don't warn the user about such strange threats.

No , It is the minimum support OS is Windows 8.1. but, it work on Windows 2000 with extended kernel :3

I may be closer to solving this problem! It appears that the issue is this: https://winraid.level1techs.com/t/win-7-64-not-working-touchpad/94960/19?u=moline I can gather that the check on this laptop checks if you have Windows 8.1 or above, and if you do, the touchpad will be enabled and allow successful installation of the HID Event Filter Driver, and thus, the Serial IO drivers. If you have Windows 7, the check will fail and disable the touchpad entirely, meaning Windows 7 won't know it exists, and one of two things will happen when you try to install the HID Event Filter driver: 1. The setup.exe will tell you your computer doesn't meet the requirements (This computer does not meet the minimum requirements for installing this software), which is expected as the OS, and thus the app, do not know that the touchpad exists, or 2. you get a 7E BSOD with IntelHidEventFilter.sys identified in the stop screen when you try to install it over a HID driver from an external device, like USB Wireless Mouse. To fix it, the following will need to be done: https://winraid.level1techs.com/t/win-7-64-not-working-touchpad/94960/33?u=moline I'm still working on deciphering this. Basically, if the DSDT table is extracted, we can modify the check so that Windows 7 will pass and allow the touchpad to be seen within the OS, and allow it to function after installing the aforementioned drivers. The way to do this is commonly used for Hackintosh installs as Macintosh will fail the check no matter the version, meaning you'd have to edit the check so that Darwin (Macintosh) pass and allow the touchpad to work under it; since I'm not dealing with Hackintosh, we just have to adapt the tutorial for Windows use. I'll report back later.

I remember there was a flag for chrome to supress it, perhaps also a similar solution can be found?

Freaking Hell! I completely ignore you, no one touches you, yet you had to bring you usual fights with others (esp. highly respected) members), like AstroSkipper, even here, into the fake legacyfan topic! Besides, you, again, made a serious violation, you hijacked the locked reputation thread, which @Tommy already warned about! I'm now putting you in the pack of these two, you know who. Congratulations to the new trio.

Then you would need to provide proof, like they do on instagram.

Because that comment is relevant, you were talking to your Texan friend, real legacyfan about the weather in Texas, if you have anything against me, you have the right to report me to the moderators, don't forget to include, or better repeat again, your public confession of your and your friend's stalking/offensive/insulting behaviour at MSFN and outside of it, on another forums where you put dirt on us. Because to me it looks like not everyone saw it. https://msfn.org/board/topic/184737-mental-health-awareness-month/?do=findComment&comment=1247108

Then we have nothing more to talk about, you're a non-Texan, fake legacyfan.

Must be Elvis himself, no less!

Of course it doesn't! You would need to have his e-mail password to see the encrypted link (again, the alleged link).

But he wrote "this issue doesn't appear with an hdd of the same size", meaning Vista works perfectly fine with GPT, but not with his SDD. About Win7, you're right, it doesn't work well with GPT/UEFI, I agree.

Here, explained already. https://msfn.org/board/topic/179532-installing-vista-or-7-using-uefigpt/

D.Draker is clairvoyant, as usual.

wmic.exe is a WMI command-line program. Maybe you have to set a path to where it is located in your system (path command). I have it twice in c:\WINDOWS\system32\wbem\ and c:\WINDOWS\system32\dllcache\. Usually these paths already exist.

In my opinion this cmd file is not working properly. So I decided to disable sfc to do it manually where the batch file fails. You can do registry manipulation by reg file (copy the section in cmd file to reg file) and apply all patches which were executed. I did it and it works. I think this file has to be executed as admin.

Hello to all. First thanks all for your help! I've examined what was going wrong in my system. I found out that the patch in Restore_WU_XP_2003.7z didn't work in my system due to system file protection. The file wuaueng.dll was replaced by sfc. So I patched my sfc_os.dll in folder system32 to disable sfc. Here is a working instruction: After that patching I put the patched sfc_os.dll in both folder system32 and system32\dllcache. Now I was able to copy manually wuaueng.dll in both folders. But that was not enough. To get Microsoft Update working you have to edit config.ini in ProxHTTPSProxy or HTTPSProxy shown in my screenshot. Now it works and I can use Microsoft Update in my Internet Explorer. See my screenshot! https://imgur.com/CmN76Au https://imgur.com/re8X4cH

Well, I did all steps without any success. I tried ProxHTTPSProxy instead of HTTPSProxy, imported ca.cert and so on. I get different error codes dependent on entries in ProxHTTPSProxy's config.ini. @xpandvistafan Did you change these settings? What am I missing?

Ok, I've merged the reg file into my registry. The first two entries have been already there, only the key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\WinHttp was missing. After restarting my computer when searching updates I get a new error code 0x80244004. Additionally I tried to modify the entries [SSL No-Verify] and [SSL Pass-Thru] of HTTPSProxy's config.ini without final success. Can you provide your entries in ProxHTTPSProxy's config.ini? And did you patch anything else or have you imported additional certificates? Here is my screenshot with error code 0x80244004: https://imgur.com/yDfXPOc