Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/11/2023 in all areas

  1. If it's a private upload on a hosting site such as Mega or Dropbox it's probably OK. However if it's on a download site that contains warez it certainly isn't! PM me the link and I will check it out.
    3 points
  2. I’m pleased that this topic has been resurrected today because Mental Health Awareness Month is still in full swing and I sincerely believe that MSFN is one place that needs greater awareness of this issue! I posted this news in the Funny Farm subforum not so much because of its comedic potential but because “funny farm” is synonymous with “nut house,” “cuckoo’s nest,” or “insane asylum.” At least one of this forum’s most compulsive posters has still not replied to this topic, but I won’t say who unless he/she decides to step forward. Being mentally ill certainly does not suggest stupidity - oh no far from it! The close kinship between genius and madness has been remarked on since ancient times. I think we have some very bright members here who need to devote more attention to something other than old versions of Windows.
    2 points
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_nihilism
    2 points
  4. Yeah, I noticed that too. That's sad indeed. You can post it in a PM normally. Or, we can ask the moderators, if posting the link in a PM isn't an option for you. @Dave-H What do you say? Is it allowed to post such links or not?
    2 points
  5. Perhaps my words sound too frightening. Indeed they are. You just have to look past the meaningless distractions and see the meat grinder for what it is. https://teddit.net/r/MorbidReality/ Also, I'm sure @NotHereToPlayGames looks just fine the way he is and even if he does look to odd to someone, that's not a reason to attack him or anyone else for that matter. It just occured to me that I've heard several times now that also applies to country where I'm from that some people are afraid to go out in the night time while that wasn't the case 30+ years ago or so. Anyway, I'm tired and need the leave, which I'm taking very soon. School was much better in that regard, a week off every season and Christmas / new year period and 2 months off every summer. Now it's just work work work...what's the point? In any case, I remain a cynic.
    2 points
  6. Norton was actually spun off from Symantec before merging with Avast, so Symantec is not part of Gen Digital. There has long been a need for consolidation in the antimalware industry because there were too many unprofitable vendors competing. Now that the typical Windows 10 user simply relies on Microsoft’s excellent antimalware, Gen Digital just might be big enough to survive! I thought you disapproved of “discussions about concerns regarding the country of origin”? You make an exception for Russia, but apparently imagine that China exists to benefit Windows XP diehards.
    2 points
  7. Not by default. https://bitmovin.com/demos/drm
    2 points
  8. Senzo Mall Hurghada Egypt Hurghada AirPort
    2 points
  9. In Firefox 113, any kind of fullscreen video is broken under Win7/8, see here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1832547 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1830721 Apparently this bug was known for 10 days in Nightly but went through for release, because they don't even test stuff under Win7 anymore, and the fix is only scheduled for May 23rd right now. Oh well, maybe this topic can save others the hassle.
    1 point
  10. 1 point
  11. I had originally tested with a Windows 7 install with a low update level, but I have received complaints about it not working with ESU updates. Do you have those? For that reason I will also start testing (and debugging) with ESU updates.
    1 point
  12. Actually VARTA. I guess they make some batteries for automotive assembly plants to be fitted to newly manufactured cars. The picture above may eventually disappear, along with the source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/234924280418
    1 point
  13. I kind of see both sides. There is the saying "you get what you pay for". And we are talking about XP. XP is a paid-for Operating System. But clearly a thread like this can't go out and buy twenty different antivirus programs just for the sake of MSFN Assistance.
    1 point
  14. It was on 10.06.17: KB4022747, KB402432 and KB4024402.
    1 point
  15. That's one way to date XP. But I think of XP as being from 2008 because that's when SP3 was released. Unsure when the last official (non-POSReady) hotfix rolled out - 2014? 2017? Don't recall. Ubuntu users don't define their OS as being released in 2004, do they? I'm not even sure how to "date" Win 10. I kind of think of the different versions of Win 10 as "service packs". Potato, potahto (phonetics saying in the US).
    1 point
  16. OK, so I tested a video in Firefox Nightly 115.0a1 (2023-05-11) (64-bit) on my Windows 7 SP1 64-bit VM, and full screen video isn't broken to me.
    1 point
  17. Sampei.Nihira mentioned that Tuesday. Maybe more Windows 7 users should test the nightly builds? Mozilla isn’t loaded with cash like Google, and might not survive the year.
    1 point
  18. Yes, sites that contain warez aren't OK of course, I was mainly asking about file hoster sites.
    1 point
  19. Well, the year is 2023 and Windows XP was released in 2001. Perhaps you are living in the wrong period? Though there is only one sure way through time and that is forward. Thinking back now, I think I exaggerated when I wrote that post here... ...the part about Mozart and DOOM. I guess generally more or less things from the person's own period is used. How much stuff from 1920 do you use? Additionally, and this is important, we're living in a time where these things develop rapidly, unlike when nothing changed in the person's entire lifetime. Anyway, is there a technical reason one should expect different results when Glarysoft's Quick Startup is running on XP that runs on bare hardware versus under a virtualizer?
    1 point
  20. Never used it in an UXP browser! If I wanted to use such Google services, I would open them in a browser on my Android tablet. Google and Android is an endless love.
    1 point
  21. Front Note: "you" in the US is plural and I use it here in that fashion. "you" does not 'equal' AstroSkipper. I agree in the sense that if you "fully support" a program, you don't generally concern yourself with being "counted" by embedded telemetry doing that "counting" and reporting back to The Creator. But even as such, there are generally Opt-Out clauses where the consumer can decide for him/her self if they want to be "counted" or not. Some consumers are concerned that their anti-virus has data on them being, purely as an example, both as a church-goer and as a frequent visitor to "Web Site X" (or should I call it "Web Site XXX"?). I personally follow the philosophy that if you want "privacy" and not be "tracked" online, then you need to pull the plug and live in a cardboard box. Or something like that, lol.
    1 point
  22. Ok! I'm going to go a round further now as I'm getting fed up with this nonsense. Obviously @bluebolt is not willing to disclose any meaningful information here and share his knowledge with us in this forum. And that will have its reasons. First of all, here are the facts: The still downloadable online installers don't work anymore. BitDefender must have removed the online sources which these installers need to download. Offline installers are no longer available. All links seem to be removed. In one of @bluebolt's pictures, one can clearly see that a connection to My BitDefender is no longer possible. Here is a quotation from this picture: "My Bitdefender: Could not connect to server" Regarding these facts it is also pretty obvious why @bluebolt only spreads information here that is not really helpful. I assume or, even stronger, I am quite sure that even if such an offline installer exists, a successful activation of a new installation via the user interface won't be possible any longer. The reason for this was provided by @bluebolt himself: No connection to My BitDefender means no login into the user's account which unfortunately is necessary for a successful activation. Therefore, a new activation is no longer possible. I therefore consider BitDefender 1.0.21.1109 obsolete and no longer usable. No entry in my "list of working antimalware, firewall, and other security programs for Windows XP", but at most in the "list of programs that have recently been abandoned", although it actually was abandonded for more than a year. And further information is no longer necessary either, certainly not such pointless information that is not actually intended to help potential users of this program here in the forum.
    1 point
  23. i said you have to turn on testsigning on for windows 8.1 as well to to use the latest driver. GeForce Security Update Driver | 474.30 | Windows 7 64-bit, Windows 8.1 64-bit, Windows 8 64-bit | NVIDIA thats the latest driver for windows 8.1 https://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/203218/en-us/
    1 point
  24. "Default" means I unzipped it and ran as-is, did not add any extensions, and it does not play DRM content.
    1 point
  25. You do not miss anything, the server is missing files Use a proxy like Fiddler Classic, set it up, change Internet Explorer settings to use it on port 8888 and give me the filenames (.inv, .bm, .as, .gng) and the folder name.
    1 point
  26. The language code identifier to locale name and locale name to language code identifier functions may not be needed anyway for the browser to work for WinME. 0x0C00 is a default LCID. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-lcid/926e694f-1797-4418-a922-343d1c5e91a6
    1 point
  27. Exactly. Luckily we're on an old version that won't get any changes anyway. I just hope they won't kill it. Ah and by the way, the merger has only been approved by the European regulator few days ago, so they were still effectively two separate companies. Anyway, it saddens me a bit to see avast end up in the hands of Symantec (which is actually broadcom). So now we have Piriform (Speccy, CCleaner etc), Norton, Symantec, Avira, AVG and Avast all under one single company, Gen Digital. P.s I saw the whole discussion about Kaspersky, but to be fair, the last thing I wanna do in this historical period is install a Russian antivirus on my computer. I mean... it's probably ok, but these days you never know...
    1 point
  28. Changes to the display driver installation process under Microsoft Windows 7 | NVIDIA (custhelp.com) https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5445/~/changes-to-the-display-driver-installation-process-under-microsoft-windows-7 it applys to windows 8.1 as well
    1 point
  29. Thanks for the suggestion about those codecs. I got all of the mentioned tools and to be honest wasn't sure what exactly to do with most of them, but autoruns did show me two Techsmith codecs, which were vidc.tsc2 and vidc.tscc, with a reference to the SysWOW64 folder. I got rid of them alongside all the corresponding registry entries I could find. In total, the deleted files were: tsccvid64.dll, tsccvid.dll, tsc2_codec64.dll and tsc2_codec32.dll. After a reboot, I could not see any Techsmith in Resource Monitor, but as soon as I start Firefox, unfortunately that activation.cloud.techsmith.com connection is back.
    1 point
  30. It looks like Kaspersky Free 2019 is no longer an option for any OS. I just searched Kaspersky’s website and it was possible to select paid versions of Kaspersky 2019 (evidently offline installers), but the only free version in the dropdown list was 2018. If anyone is interested in those: https://products.s.kaspersky-labs.com/
    1 point
  31. found in my country's news channel. Mono 29 1st May
    1 point
  32. 1 point
  33. IMHO, this is the best one I saw from Dave-H. Couldn't stop looking at it everyday as it always made me happy.
    1 point
  34. It should work on regular Windows 7 with SP1 (it always worked in my VM with nothing but SP1, but some users complained about it not loading because of missing delay-load module; my second release should solve that). Vista needs the extended kernel however.
    1 point
  35. So Supermium, to be clear only works on extended kernel?
    1 point
  36. Thanks Dave, this topic suits in that section more than the Windows 7 section.
    1 point
  37. How so? I have Windows Server 2003 and it looks exactly like XP Pro. The two can both be made to look exactly like each other, it's all just the "theme" and theme support exists in both. The 98SE crowd would always use the Win2k "classic" theme, but I myself disliked the classic theme and would use the same theme as XP Pro. I didn't have to install the Pro theme on Server, it was already there and only needed selected/enabled.
    1 point
  38. The two can co-exist. I leave it at that.
    1 point
  39. My old friend VistaLover seems to have put me “on the spot.” Alright then: My dim recollections lead me to another forum where a Vista user who went by the name AndyTampa posted a query about Windows Mail in April 2019: https://www.vistax64.com/threads/yahoo-embedded-images-missing-damaged-in-windows-vista-default-mail-client.305570/ In the last line of the original post, he provided his exact antivirus version. I’m certain that I could unearth at least one more instance of someone using Kaspersky 19 on Vista if I searched long enough, but it wouldn’t necessarily follow that it was also compatible with XP (although one author of Kaspersky support articles certainly seems to think it was). In case I haven’t mentioned it lately, I never used Kaspersky myself. By all means attempt it! However, winvispixp stated January 22, 2021 “I couldn’t install it [KFA18] in a vm but on my real pc it works just fine.”
    1 point
  40. I can search for that post instead if you want. Do you at least remember in what topic was that post at?
    1 point
  41. And one thing is clear. I won't test any Kaspersky security program. I never liked it and I made bad experiences using it when it was installed in my system. That is years ago, and in these days ...
    1 point
  42. Something I've been wondering about, this car has EFB+ battery installed. There's not much written about the plus part, seems to be a Volkswagen thing, they only have written on one of their sites that it has surface-active carbon additives for more effective power consumption and charging capacity. But carbon additives are mentioned at other places for EFB (without plus)... The main part, the car keeps the battery charged at 80% max, supposedly to save fuel and reduce emissions, something about alternator not being run all the time by the usual means, but engaging when using engine for braking and using kinetic energy to run the alternator. I've noticed with the help of diagnostic interface that when the car is sitting for a day, battery discharges from 80% to 72%. That's a whooping 8%! The manual does mention something about shutting electronics down if it goes too low, but nothing specific, just that it can't prevent battery from going empty if you do something stupid like leaving the ignition on with the engine off. So about EFB's longevity, while it's designed to operate better at reduced state of charge, I wonder if it would still be beneficial long-term to charge it every once in a while, given that the car is mostly sitting in garage for weekends and a week at a time few times per year. Edit: Higher state-of-charge should still be the better state to be in. https://microtexindia.com/efb-battery/
    1 point
  43. 1 point
  44. I learned the speed-up-then-coast back when "hypermiling" was a big thing. One of my "favorite" things to do is see a RED LIGHT over half a mile up the road and take my foot off the gas and coast the entire half mile.
    1 point
  45. I eventually picked up the habit of cruising at 110 km/h rather than 130 km/h on the motorway and that reduced the fuel consumption to little over 5.7 l/100km on that model. That 4.5 l/100km figure is on the current 2022 model, after recently experimenting with cruising in 90 - 100 km/h range. Slower indeed gets you further. Some time ago I stumbled upon this comment on YouTube, forgot which video: That, I haven't experimented with. Those that encounter me on the road must already think I'm insane as it is. But, I get to listen to the music longer!
    1 point
  46. There is literally only one stop sign between my house and where I work. Only three turns to get to work and one of them is at the end of my driveway.
    1 point
  47. I was at a customer site a couple weeks ago to do some physical inventory work and they had quite a few Windows XP computers at both of the locations I visited. I thought about this thread but also knew it would not have been appropriate for me to take pictures of those computers. They were only being used to run old machines. Some were used to run some sort of metal grinding machine and others were used to operate lasers.
    1 point
  48. Game over I think, it doesn't get better than this! Neneh Cherry onstage at the Glastonbury Festival after the laptop running her background video apparently crashed!
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...