Leaderboard

You may be right. Nevertheless, it is always a question of trust. And if you have the choice between a Chinese browser that was modified by Russians, and then not fully translated into the English language, and on the other hand a browser that was ported from the Mozilla community, the choice is not really difficult in terms of security and privacy. Right? I use the 360Chrome browsers, too, but only rarely. I would neither enter any passwords, secret information, nor any payment related data into one of these 360Chrome browsers. I do not trust them at all! And, today even less than before! And to be honest, it would not matter to me whatever the outcome of any safety tests. My main browsers are New Moon 28, Serpent 52, and Mypal 68. 360Chrome browsers are only fed by me with Google-infested rubbish, where security and privacy don't matter anyway. But, as paradoxical as it may sound, I am still glad that these Chrome browsers exist in Windows XP.

Some people may not have status bars because they mix-and-match "skins". Or they've disabled the status bar in the settings page toolbar section -- chrome://settings/uiStyle Regarding "safer", there is no such thing! If you want "safer", then do not use anything but Microsoft's latest-and-greatest operating system and Mozilla's or Google's latest-and-greatest web browser. PERIOD. For those of us that don't give a rat's butt about "safety" and "security" (and are smart enough to control those aspects "granularly"), the LONG LIVE XP and the web browsers back-ported for XP. I have seen XP-ported browsers not make any connection to China. But ran the same EXACT browser on Win7 and it connects to China. So "testing" is in the eye of the beholder.

My copy of 13.5 has a bottom status bar.

Thanks for the suggestion, but I think it's now fixed. I cleared the history (by deleting the 360History file) and the newly generated one seems to now be OK. I guess something must have got corrupted in the old file. So far so good, I'll let you all know if it malfunctions again! Cheers, Dave.

... In addition to the Pale Moon forum thread linked to by @nicolaasjan , pertaining to Regex Named Capturing Groups, UXP is also plagued by lack of support for another Regex "feature" I "spoke" about in my Aug 29th post: Sadly, it's not; as your posted Error Console Log says, this is due to missing Regex Unicode Property Escapes support in UXP ; upstream have open issues for it at: https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1282 (=> https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1286 [closed, unresolved] =>) https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1675 but they have seen little action as of late... So, as you see, complete SNAFU in the RegExp "front"...

@UCyborg Great to see you back after approximately 3 months of your inactivity! How's life going? Many people in this forum miss you. Mainly, me, @XPerceniol, @msfntor and @AstroSkipper miss you here. I hope you're fine.

I know I am not @XPerceniol, but, let me tell you that, I wish I could read your interesting posts, but nowadays, studying pressure is increasing slowly overtime.

I still technically see ZERO benefits to upgrading. But I do use v13.5 as my default nowadays on all but one computer (it only has 2GB RAM and it uses v11 as its default but does have v13.5 to browser one tab only when being used on that computer). It will not solve 100% of your web browsing needs, but neither will ANY of the web browsers herein at MSFN. I do keep an eye on NM27 and NM28 and maybe one of these days they will work on all the web sites I need them to work on (NM28 does work for my water bill nowadays, but NM28 does not work for my savings account, NM27 doesn't work for either).

360loader.exe with modified custom flags inside the file 360Loader.ini.

Frankly, I use Chrome browsers in Windows XP very rarely, only for Googlized websites or comparisons with roytam1's browsers. More recent versions don't mean to be better. 360Chrome v11 is just about bearable in terms of its performance and resource consumption, 360Chrome v13 on the other hand is beyond good and evil in my low-resource system. And yes, the installed version of v13 is 360ChromePortable 13.0.2206 rebuild 9. This is the recommended version (actually 13.0.2107) by @NotHereToPlayGames as far as I know. Supposedly, you won't gain any benefits if upgrading to version v13.5. Yes, I trust build 2107 more. It's been more stable for my use. Mileage may vary. It's NOT a "downgrade". The build numbers seem to confuse far to many people. Halfway through v13, the original creator went to Chromium v86.4240.198. Some of the earlier v13's stem from Chromium v86.4240.112. Even v13.5 and v13.6 use the same exact v86.4240.198 - YOU GAIN NOTHING. I *distrust* v13.5 and v13.6 - I WILL NOT BE UPGRADING THEM (so don't even ask, wink wink).

Alder Lake works perfect on Windows 7, you need a processor with F (no integrated graphics), a dedicated graphics card (preferably 10 series and below), a ps2 mouse, and a dedicated wifi/ethernet card. I am doing the test on an Asus B660-M A Prime. I think even Windows Vista SP2 is possible.

https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=28800&p=231804&hilit=invalid+regexp#p231804 No progress at all, it seems...

@AstroSkipper - you do not need to sound so "rude" and "condescending".

win32 , just wanted to say again and again , your kernel is absolutely fantastic , even with that weird shell issue . All extensions finally work ! No more need to force them.