Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. You can shorten it a little: if (shExpMatch(host, "*.example.com")|shExpMatch(host, "*.google.*")|shExpMatch(host, "*.wetter.com")) { But it is very confusing. However, I have noticed that it sometimes causes problems if the website integrates external content that does not have SSL. In this case, the external website must also be recorded. I'm thinking about running all pages via the proxy after all :-) However, the following sentence from the developer unsettles me: Be aware and careful! Use a direct connection when you don't want any mistakes made. Is the proxy not secure, or what does this mean?
  3. 64-bit version of PuTTY 0.81 needs hex editing to get running on XP x64 as minimum OS version specified in the PE header is 6.0 (Vista) instead of 5.2 (XP x64 / Server 2003).
  4. I had to create for each domain a separate, new IF query otherwise it wouldn't have worked in my installation.
  5. https://www.ghacks.net/2024/05/21/microsoft-announces-copilot-pcs-and-ai-powered-recall-feature/ If this is to be the future, I prefer to take refuge in Linux. I have used Linux in the past but it bored me. My daughter in middle school (2005) had a Linux PC prepared by me I don't remember the distro but it was almost certainly Ubuntu. She had many compatibility problems compared to other students. So this experiment was short-lived,if I remember correctly about 2 years. I have also used other distros,and now I really have no idea which one is best suited for my PC. Which could be upgraded to Windows 11.....but I still haven't decided whether to do this upgrade.
  6. Yes, that is the problem. With "*." all third-level domains are recorded. Can several different domains be entered in the IF query, or do I have to make a separate query for each domain?
  7. @Anbima didn't say anything about that. If one doesn't make clear announcements, one can't expect to get exactly the information one needs. We are not clairvoyants. If the PAC script contains a different URL than the one you want to call up, you don't have to be surprised that it doesn't work.
  8. Today
  9. Hi, I want to purchase two licenses, one for my personal desktop and one for a work laptop. However it appears that the minimum business purchase is for ten licenses. As I only require one this model is not appropriate to me. Please advise.
  10. On the insider's 26212 everything is fine too, including the classic taskbar.
  11. I was wondering if I can successfully install windows 7 on an Acer nitro V with mostly all the drivers fully functioning I’ve gotten it to install partially in the past but it locks up on “starting windows” after first reboot and first boot off the m.2 Specs: Intel Core i5-12500H 3.10Ghz 12th Gen 12 Cores Alder Lake Intel Iris Xe Graphics 128MB BIOS VRAM 8129MB Total VRAM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU 4096MB OS: 1TB M.2 SSD WD Green Backup: 1.92TB SATA Lexar SSD 16GB DDR4 (2x 8GB DDR4) Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX16501 160MHz Realtek HD Audio
  12. I actually think what he's trying to do is for one.example.com two.example.com three.example.com www.example.com and what you are proposing will only work for example.com
  13. Yeah. I upgraded to non-Insider 26100. So far I'm finding it very stable and SAB is working.
  14. Any idea why the modern tooltips are not applied when opening an app (PotPlayer) from shell/context menu? Running the app by double clicking the exe Running the app from shell/context menu
  15. For me. it works as it should. No. No green. Just insert the PAC script code! You won't get any confirmation messages. I really don't know what you are doing. All a bit strange. "example.com" is completely sufficient and exactly corresponds to the URL which you wanted to load.
  16. Tihiy

    vdi licence

    CAL are not required, licensing is per host PC.
  17. It doesn't work for me. I have entered the PAC script. Should the tick be green? I can't confirm anything. What am I doing wrong? ... For me it must be "*.example.com". Then it works.
  18. ... I guess "we"'re moving in circles here, aren't "we"? If you don't want to employ a local PAC script after all and you want to use ProxyMII in 360EE by selectively (manually) enabling it on the (now two) problem sites, no extension is required; the options have been already presented to you by both Astroskipper and me: 1. Configure IE8 to use ProxyMII (its FrontServer) just for secure connections - then, manually enable this configuration in 360EE by setting "Proxy -> Use IE proxy" for the two "problem" sites, or 2. Configure 360EE to use ProxyMII (its FrontServer) directly (i.e. leaving IE8 out of this) and then manually enable this configuration, just for your two "problem" sites, by selecting "Proxy -> localhost:8079" (see image attachments in my previous reply just above) when visiting the affected sites ...
  19. Already answered by me: And since you made such a fuss about PAC here, the extension Proxy Switcher and Manager 0.5.0 which requires very little memory is the solution without having to switch the proxy manually when using a PAC script inside this extension.
  20. There is some issue with 512 MB VRAM in Win98 FE, but I haven't dug into what it is exactly.
  21. Thank you very much for your help. It would probably be best with an extension. However, a very simple extension that only activates the proxy would be sufficient. I could then enable this with 360Chrome on the respective website. So a PAC would not be necessary at all. Is there a suitable extension that requires very little memory?
  22. That's not the issue at all. Most of developers and manufactors have stopped supporting Windows XP, and Windows 3.11, of course. That's not the problem at all. But to trash and ridicule special forks for older OSes such as New Moon 28, which is excellently maintained by @roytam1, is a no-go and shows a fundamental lack of respect.
  23. I don't disagree. But... um... I don't disagree with "them" either. "They" have a different audience then "we" do. Whether we like to admit it or not, "their" future is HELD BACK *if* they bend over backwards for "us". Seriously, where do you think NM27, NM28, St52, or St55 would really REALLY be today if they tried to maintain compatibility with Win 3.1 or Win 3.11? The difference is, as I see it, is that MSFN Members acknowledge that "both can coexist". I cannot confirm nor deny if they think the same. Because let's also admit that most of us MSFN Members only "read" what's going on "over there" when somebody brings the "negatives" over to MSFN. I do not follow their forum. I don't exactly agree with "us" being updated when anti-MSFN or anti-XP posts are posted "over there". It's why I have a privacy fence at the house. Neighbor's weed-filled lawn compared to my grass-only, not a single solitary "broadleaf" -- fence = "out of sight, out of mind".
  24. The PM forum can take a leaf out of MSFN's book. We welcome everyone. You can get help here even if you don't use Windows XP or other older operating systems. For example, my thread "Extensions and custom buttons for UXP browsers - Corrections, modifications, adjustments, and special recommendations" is open to anyone who uses legacy extensions, whether in New Moon 28, Pale Moon or whatever compatible browser. I also don't care whether the poster in question uses Windows 7, Windows 10 or even the crappy Windows 11. He will not be verbally punished in any way, even if I personally do not favour these OSes. That's how it has to be. But these Fright Wing and trollbat types from the PM forum won't understand that. Their horizons aren't good enough for that.
  25. Thanks, I also have the option of a Quadro NVS-440 which is a PCI-E card. OP says AGP but that's wrong (https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/quadro-nvs-440-pcie-x16.c1463) As this is a dual GPU card will it "just work" in W98?
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...