Supermium

[Milkinis]

13 minutes ago, 66cats said:

Hi, seems to be working for me (software) in XP x64, will update on 32-bit & Vista in a few mins.

I performed the test on two different computers (AMD quads) and yet it flows better under 360chrome when scrolling, draging the Rover's camera

I didn't try it on Haswell CPU though....

[Milkinis]

44 minutes ago, 66cats said:

Another edit: partial HW acceleration in 7 on this box

https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259507 

 

Edited February 3, 2024 by Milkinis

[XPerceniol]

Yeah the new version is unusable even with the rebase of DLL files.

[66cats]

26 minutes ago, Milkinis said:

https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259507 

Different box. This is an x58 with a Westmere Xeon & a pair of 960s in SLI (i know, i know, but one of those would be sitting in a drawer if i din't stick in this box). BTW, check out VistaLover's comment -- on 32-bit XP the difference is night & day (for me).

Without new DLLs

With new .DLLs 

Edited February 3, 2024 by 66cats

[Milkinis]

7 minutes ago, 66cats said:

Different box. This is an x58 with a Westmere Xeon & a pair of 960s in SLI

Xean processors don't fully support hardware acceleration 

[Milkinis]

11 minutes ago, 66cats said:

BTW, check out VistaLover's comment -- on 32-bit XP the difference is night & day (for me).

that trick does nothing for me in fact win32 fixed the rebased dll from this link

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/files/14129613/rebased_dlls.zip

anyway the map issues have nothing to do with RAM usage...

[66cats]

15 minutes ago, Milkinis said:

does nothing for me

Cuts my memory use in ~half. Actually did a double take -- removed those DLLs from the folder, relaunched Chrome ... memory use doubled. Put them back, it halves again.

 

20 minutes ago, Milkinis said:

Xean processors don't fully support hardware acceleration

I think it's more about GPU & driver than the CPU's feature set. Could be mistaken. P.S. those old Xeons are missing AVX2 though, some stuff simply won't run on them. In their defense: cheaper than dirt.

BTW, what OS are you in?

Edited February 3, 2024 by 66cats

[Milkinis]

4 minutes ago, 66cats said:

Cuts my memory use in ~half. Actually did a double take -- removed those DLLs from the folder, relaunched Chrome ... memory use doubled. Put them back, it halves again.

I tried this myself on both Supermium 121 1st release and the hot-fix release.

I restared the computer just in case but the memory usage is still the same

[66cats]

3 minutes ago, Milkinis said:

tried this myself

Bizarre. Just to make sure, you're sticking them in Chrome-bin folder, where chrome.exe sits, right? In 32-bit XP, how much memory does Chrome 121 with just this tab open use?

[Dixel]

15 hours ago, Klemper said:

Guys, please help, I need to remove these completely.

The ugly lumpen icon is usually removed with this startup flag.

--hide-avatar-button

I don't know whether it's still valid here, in this chromium fork.

[Dixel]

@win32, I have a serious issue to report. I can't pass my full list of flags. The browser only accepts a much shorter, reduced variant. I can 100% confirm, it's not some exact flags it doesn't want, it's their overall length in cmd.

OS - Vista x64 6003 without Kernel. Browser also x64.

[Milkinis]

28 minutes ago, 66cats said:

 In 32-bit XP, how much memory does Chrome 121 with just this tab open use?

just about 500 MB (zero extensions).

I removed the user data folder and started from scratch just in case.

[dmiranda]

1 hour ago, Milkinis said:

that trick does nothing for me in fact win32 fixed the rebased dll from this link

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/files/14129613/rebased_dlls.zip

anyway the map issues have nothing to do with RAM usage...

As per his words, they were later on (same thread) rebuilt from scratch due to some remaining issues. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/files/14141689/corrected_api_sets.zip

[XPerceniol]

22 minutes ago, dmiranda said:

As per his words, they were later on (same thread) rebuilt from scratch due to some remaining issues. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/files/14141689/corrected_api_sets.zip

So we should try to use these files instead of the ones posted by Milkinis?

[XPerceniol]

2 hours ago, 66cats said:

Cuts my memory use in ~half. Actually did a double take -- removed those DLLs from the folder, relaunched Chrome ... memory use doubled. Put them back, it halves again.

 

I think it's more about GPU & driver than the CPU's feature set. Could be mistaken. P.S. those old Xeons are missing AVX2 though, some stuff simply won't run on them. In their defense: cheaper than dirt.

BTW, what OS are you in?

Are you saying to add those 2 files posted, but which ones, now I'm confused?

Edited February 3, 2024 by XPerceniol