Jump to content

Supermium


Recommended Posts


Using BOTH process tamer 2.14 (which comes in the portable zip of the app), together with process lasso (set supermium "always" priority class to below normal) works in my set up to tame processor usage peaks, making supermium quite stable, actually (compared to using either app separately or, needless to say, none of them).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A new public release of Supermium by win32 showed up a few hours ago, still on the M122 Chromium core: 

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v122-r4

As always, read first very well all the associated Release Notes and finer details ;) ... 

FWIW, take note of:

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/531

that is, if you're gonna use the provided installer to perform an "on-top update" (update a previous Sm installation), better reboot your OS before doing so (registry-entries related issue :dubbio:...).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, VistaLover said:

A new public release of Supermium by win32 showed up a few hours ago, still on the M122 Chromium core: 

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v122-r4

VERY IMPRESSED so far !!!

Even in a single-core VirtualBox VM running XP x86 SP3.

"Ungoogled" is still not fully ungoogled - there should be no "1 app (Web Store)" in a fully ungoogled variation.

image.thumb.png.6a1aaceb474c4ee129832c96f41a8ee1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, VistaLover said:

FWIW, take note of:

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/531

that is, if you're gonna use the provided installer to perform an "on-top update" (update a previous Sm installation), better reboot your OS before doing so (registry-entries related issue :dubbio:...).

This is only Windows 7 related.

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/531#issuecomment-2091118136

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My XP continues to cut off the left edge of GUI fonts (web rendered fonts are fine).

This is true in Supermium, Thorium, CatsXP, Chromium ESR 92, and Chromium ESR 108.  In XP only.

What can I do to assist in FIXING this - I will not become a GitHub member, so what else can I do to assist in tracking this nuance down?

image.thumb.png.f76c3dc72a5f5ee6fd8d05b705b9a510.png

image.png.858d4464fb44b0036b39ffa255314842.png

image.png.4373b68f3a25d6cf9cd95829951de040.png

image.png.6c348d250b9705d307896688ef19bc51.png

image.png.96e1062d4b2ef009634198dc41f7bcb3.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Yes.

It's a pity, I kinda hoped for a faster Ungoogling process. What exactly was Ungoogled, then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

This is true in Supermium, Thorium, CatsXP, Chromium ESR 92, and Chromium ESR 108.  In XP only.

Hmm... are any of these work on XP? CatsXP doesn't even start on Vista without Kernel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, VistaLover said:

OT :blushing: , but which specific version of CatsXP was XP-compatible? :dubbio:

OT.

Last Vista one was probably based on Chrome 85, if I'm not mistaken. XP, most likely from 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

My XP continues to cut off the left edge of GUI fonts (web rendered fonts are fine).

This is true in Supermium, Thorium, CatsXP, Chromium ESR 92, and Chromium ESR 108.  In XP only.

What can I do to assist in FIXING this - I will not become a GitHub member, so what else can I do to assist in tracking this nuance down?

image.thumb.png.f76c3dc72a5f5ee6fd8d05b705b9a510.png

image.png.858d4464fb44b0036b39ffa255314842.png

image.png.4373b68f3a25d6cf9cd95829951de040.png

image.png.6c348d250b9705d307896688ef19bc51.png

image.png.96e1062d4b2ef009634198dc41f7bcb3.png

See what it looks like if you use the scaling switches I'm using.

/high-dpi-support=1 /force-device-scale-factor=1

That fixed a lot of font issues for me.
:dubbio:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Saxon said:

Hmm... are any of these work on XP? CatsXP doesn't even start on Vista without Kernel.

My bad, my v115 is not "CatsXP", unsure why I thought it was.  And yes, I have Chrome versions v92, v108, and v115 that all run on XP!

v92 and v108 are corporate versions, and NO, I cannot and WILL NOT distribute them !!!

v115 has been discussed on MSFN.  I forget where, exactly, but this site has a "search feature" for those so inclined to hunt it down.

image.png.b0e84d67ace2b68b56e0fa25c9fbfc2f.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...