Jody Thornton Posted March 19 Posted March 19 27 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: I have not witnessed this but I do not "pin" tabs. That bit of detail was KEY to this and nobody seems to have cited that tabs were being PINNED. So my curiousity would be this - does the issue self-correct if you UNPIN the tabs, exit and relaunch, then PIN them again? I'll have to try and look again. I do not pin tabs ever, but I could try that. Just one thing, in case I'm worsening my own situation. I never actually "install" the browser. I open the setup archive in 7-Zip, and extract the "Supermium" folder into \Program Files\Supermium. Then I run the executable with a shortcut. Is that not recommended?
hidao Posted March 19 Posted March 19 4 minutes ago, Jody Thornton said: I'll have to try and look again. I do not pin tabs ever, but I could try that. Just one thing, in case I'm worsening my own situation. I never actually "install" the browser. I open the setup archive in 7-Zip, and extract the "Supermium" folder into \Program Files\Supermium. Then I run the executable with a shortcut. Is that not recommended? Same to you...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 19 Posted March 19 23 minutes ago, Jody Thornton said: I'll have to try and look again. I do not pin tabs ever, but I could try that. Just one thing, in case I'm worsening my own situation. I never actually "install" the browser. I open the setup archive in 7-Zip, and extract the "Supermium" folder into \Program Files\Supermium. Then I run the executable with a shortcut. Is that not recommended? I never pin tabs. I also never "install" Supermium. In addition, *NONE* of my browsers are ever launched "as-provided", they all get their own 'portable launcher'. None of my browsers are allowed access to OS registry and cannot read/write outside their own directory/sub-directory. If you've never pinned tabs, you may have something else going on. 1
Jody Thornton Posted March 20 Posted March 20 Well I found that "something else going on" item of disruption; my old profile. Backed up my old profile, started a new one, and voila, the UI is back to its old self on the new v132 release. Yay!
Saxon Posted March 21 Posted March 21 Supermium weird colour issues are finally admitted by the developer and allegedly fixed, at least some of them. "improved the context menu colour" https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 21 Posted March 21 (edited) Cool. But this *CAN NOT* be the same *COMPLAINT* that the dark mode users have been *COMPLAINING* about here at MSFN because *NOBODY* has said *ANYTHING* about #native-ui-style OR context menus. Q. E. D. We're just keep throwing noodles at the wall until one of them finally sticks. ie, changing the story along the way until we finally have a "detail" that *matches* and then claiming that was the "detail" being cited all along (but we all know better). Edited March 21 by NotHereToPlayGames 1
Saxon Posted March 21 Posted March 21 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: Cool. But this *CAN NOT* be the same *COMPLAINT* that the dark mode users have been *COMPLAINING* about here at MSFN because *NOBODY* has said *ANYTHING* about #native-ui-style OR context menus. Q. E. D. We're just keep throwing noodles at the wall until one of them finally sticks. ie, changing the story along the way until we finally have a "detail" that *matches* and then claiming that was the "detail" being cited all along (but we all know better). I should've been more specific. Supermium developer finally admitted he meddles with the default colour scheme and theme.
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 21 Posted March 21 Fair enough, THAT I can agree to (we knew the INACTIVE tab bar changed). It's still a gigantic PITFA that the complaints about brightness have never actually been precisely pinpointed and I spent hours upon hours hunting through RGB .css declarations and could not find ANY color differences! NONE! NOBODY said to look at the context menu! So I do not believe for one second that the original "complaint" was a context menu! Not for one second. I tried and tried to "help" but the story kept changing as to "where" this "brightness" is located! One day was complaints about "piercing white". The next day it was complaints about "acid blue". Seriously, from this side of things, the story kept changing! 1
D.Draker Posted March 21 Posted March 21 12 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: "piercing white". The next day it was complaints about "acid blue". "piercing white" and "acid blue" all come from the overall increased brightness and digital vibrance, is the word overblown clear to you? That's what Supermium has in terms of colours. But it can be not so noticeable on e-waste, 10 years old LED monitors. LED is designed to be used for no more than 3-5 years, they awfully degrade overtime, much faster than CCFL and irreversibly kill your retina, so the fact you finally opened up about having a near 10 y.o. LED display is even worse than the alleged 20 years old Dell 2407. On one hand, it possibly took a lot of courage to admit about having such a monitor, on the other - a bit shallow, considering the fact you knew there's a "crew" watching, lol. 3
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 21 Posted March 21 38 minutes ago, D.Draker said: near 10 y.o. LED display I never said near 10. I also never said LED. Moving on... What I have in my living room and computer room really is NONE of your business. You just like to "pick fights" and for some ungodly reason, my monitors have a target on their back. Not sure where, 'cause I'm sitting right in front of them and can't see the target. And I have 20/20 vision. This is just *YOU* "picking fights", plain and simple. Moving on... 1
D.Draker Posted March 21 Posted March 21 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: I never said near 10. I also never said LED. 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: I know you and your crew are doing this on purpose (too sequential to not be on purpose). You said 20 in one post, one of your followers then said 30, now you're at 40. I give it four days for somebody to call my less-than-10-year-old monitor 50 years old. https://msfn.org/board/topic/186741-firefox-and-chromium-running-on-windows-7-by-e3kskskoy7wqk/?do=findComment&comment=1278904 They quit making CCFL around 2007, around 18 years ago, so yeah it's LED. you said it's "less than 10 y.o." Shades of white and proper shadows are only visible on a good, properly calibrated, expensive LED, which is LESS than 5, not "less than 10 years old" like yours, but then again, I don't blame you, it's just strange why at least 5 people here see that, and you don't. 3
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 22 Posted March 22 What is OLED? Is that my TV or my monitor, I really don't remember, NOR CARE. I don't recall without digging through credit card statements or whatnot how old my monitors are. For one, *I* don't care, only *YOU* do. Your obscession, not mine. I really DO NOT UNDERSTAND why *YOU* hang on my every word. Sure, I threw out "less than 10", who the H#LL CARES how old my "less than 10" are except for the PICK-A-FIGHT *BS* here at MSFN ??? 1
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 22 Posted March 22 1 hour ago, D.Draker said: why at least 5 people *ALL* dark-mode users. It's not they that keep PICKING BS FIGHTS over trivial S H I T !!! !!! 1
D.Draker Posted March 22 Posted March 22 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: *ALL* dark-mode users. It's not they that keep PICKING BS FIGHTS over trivial S H I T !!! !!! On github, it doesn't say the fix related only to dark mode. 4
Recommended Posts