Milkinis Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 13 minutes ago, 66cats said: Hi, seems to be working for me (software) in XP x64, will update on 32-bit & Vista in a few mins. I performed the test on two different computers (AMD quads) and yet it flows better under 360chrome when scrolling, draging the Rover's camera I didn't try it on Haswell CPU though.... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 (edited) 44 minutes ago, 66cats said: Another edit: partial HW acceleration in 7 on this box https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259507 Edited February 3 by Milkinis 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPerceniol Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Yeah the new version is unusable even with the rebase of DLL files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
66cats Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Milkinis said: https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259507 Different box. This is an x58 with a Westmere Xeon & a pair of 960s in SLI (i know, i know, but one of those would be sitting in a drawer if i din't stick in this box). BTW, check out VistaLover's comment -- on 32-bit XP the difference is night & day (for me). Without new DLLs With new .DLLs Edited February 3 by 66cats 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 7 minutes ago, 66cats said: Different box. This is an x58 with a Westmere Xeon & a pair of 960s in SLI Xean processors don't fully support hardware acceleration 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 11 minutes ago, 66cats said: BTW, check out VistaLover's comment -- on 32-bit XP the difference is night & day (for me). that trick does nothing for me in fact win32 fixed the rebased dll from this link https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/files/14129613/rebased_dlls.zip anyway the map issues have nothing to do with RAM usage... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
66cats Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Milkinis said: does nothing for me Cuts my memory use in ~half. Actually did a double take -- removed those DLLs from the folder, relaunched Chrome ... memory use doubled. Put them back, it halves again. 20 minutes ago, Milkinis said: Xean processors don't fully support hardware acceleration I think it's more about GPU & driver than the CPU's feature set. Could be mistaken. P.S. those old Xeons are missing AVX2 though, some stuff simply won't run on them. In their defense: cheaper than dirt. BTW, what OS are you in? Edited February 3 by 66cats 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 4 minutes ago, 66cats said: Cuts my memory use in ~half. Actually did a double take -- removed those DLLs from the folder, relaunched Chrome ... memory use doubled. Put them back, it halves again. I tried this myself on both Supermium 121 1st release and the hot-fix release. I restared the computer just in case but the memory usage is still the same 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
66cats Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 3 minutes ago, Milkinis said: tried this myself Bizarre. Just to make sure, you're sticking them in Chrome-bin folder, where chrome.exe sits, right? In 32-bit XP, how much memory does Chrome 121 with just this tab open use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixel Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 15 hours ago, Klemper said: Guys, please help, I need to remove these completely. The ugly lumpen icon is usually removed with this startup flag. --hide-avatar-button I don't know whether it's still valid here, in this chromium fork. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixel Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 @win32, I have a serious issue to report. I can't pass my full list of flags. The browser only accepts a much shorter, reduced variant. I can 100% confirm, it's not some exact flags it doesn't want, it's their overall length in cmd. OS - Vista x64 6003 without Kernel. Browser also x64. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 28 minutes ago, 66cats said: In 32-bit XP, how much memory does Chrome 121 with just this tab open use? just about 500 MB (zero extensions). I removed the user data folder and started from scratch just in case. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmiranda Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 1 hour ago, Milkinis said: that trick does nothing for me in fact win32 fixed the rebased dll from this link https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/files/14129613/rebased_dlls.zip anyway the map issues have nothing to do with RAM usage... As per his words, they were later on (same thread) rebuilt from scratch due to some remaining issues. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/files/14141689/corrected_api_sets.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPerceniol Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 22 minutes ago, dmiranda said: As per his words, they were later on (same thread) rebuilt from scratch due to some remaining issues. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/files/14141689/corrected_api_sets.zip So we should try to use these files instead of the ones posted by Milkinis? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPerceniol Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 (edited) 2 hours ago, 66cats said: Cuts my memory use in ~half. Actually did a double take -- removed those DLLs from the folder, relaunched Chrome ... memory use doubled. Put them back, it halves again. I think it's more about GPU & driver than the CPU's feature set. Could be mistaken. P.S. those old Xeons are missing AVX2 though, some stuff simply won't run on them. In their defense: cheaper than dirt. BTW, what OS are you in? Are you saying to add those 2 files posted, but which ones, now I'm confused? Edited February 3 by XPerceniol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now