-
Posts
547 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Donations
0.00 USD
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Milkinis
-
360 Extreme Explorer Modified Version
Milkinis replied to Humming Owl's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I have been using the multi-process mode since it was introduced into the original FF52 you just can't imagine how sluggish and stressful firefox forks are with 1 single process but some users seems to be happy with it, maybe they don't open more than 2 tabs at a time....- 2,321 replies
-
1
-
360 Extreme Explorer Modified Version
Milkinis replied to Humming Owl's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/the-great-discarder/jlipbpadkjcklpeiajndiijbeieicbdh- 2,321 replies
-
My Browser Builds (Part 4)
Milkinis replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
all your posts in this forum are here in this thread. why don't you backport Basilisk to XP and why doesn't Basilisk support multi process mode by default ? -
360 Extreme Explorer Modified Version
Milkinis replied to Humming Owl's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
this issue was solved since the release of the rebuild 7 @NotHereToPlayGames with Win7 x64 and original chrome I can have more than 100 active tabs (yes active, not only open) at a time and RAM consumption is just about 3GB... I never understood the problem around chrome RAM usage because 99% of computers shipped with W7 already had 4GB of RAM or more.- 2,321 replies
-
My Browser Builds (Part 4)
Milkinis replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
''So, you want to invite people that are running malware riddled machines to have respectful online communications about web browsers?'' this one is must be living in a world apart.... -
360 Extreme Explorer Modified Version
Milkinis replied to Humming Owl's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
last build is 13.6 and it's still based on chrome 86 unfortunately- 2,321 replies
-
as I mentioned before I never use the main loader.exe and maybe the loader.ini is not involved on it sometimes when I launch the browser after several hours of no use it gets hooked on a blank screen (previous releases didn't have this issue) then I restart it and restore the previous session with Win7 it's even worse, it's totally unusable until I restart Windows, the mouse cursor goes into an infinite loop
-
bye bye. I have already deleted the crap PANDA DOME. the user interface looks terrible to my eyes with sliding hidden menus and awuful visual style, this is one out of many reasons why I hate the modern Windows editions. it's slower overall whether scanning files or launching the program than is AVAST I have a folder on the desktop with 8 malicious files (they are not false positives) all them flagged by AVAST but this PANDA DOME did only spot 1 out of 8 more, I have another folder with a virus and this PANDA DOME showed it was moved into the virus chest which is not true. more, if you restore a file from the virus chest PANDA DOME will not flag it over again because it will be seen as a clean file which is not true more, I restarted the computer and to my surprise the virus chest got wiped out for no apparent reason. more, the report log displays ''unknown name'' so it's not even able to tell the name of the suspicious detected trojans. the only plus side of PANDA DOME is that it allows you to fully disable it to prevent any service from loading on startup, this is not possible with AVAST long story short short I don't recommend the crap PANDA DOME to anyone a recent review claimed BIT DEFENDER to be the best scoring AV and AVAST in second place but it doesn't support XP anymore unfortunately