D.Draker

They surely should've given us that option.

No reason not to trust @NotHereToPlayGames, esp. when the screenshots are given.

Xp was peanuts. With a mediocre firewall, and by using the original Norwegian Opera, one could do just fine. Won 10 has so much processes, and numerous loggers running from the kernel. Could you slim down the kernel?

How's FPS in games? That driver branch is 4 years old. Why no ray tracing, no Physx?

Size isn't the best measurement, FPS and benchmarks are. They could've just used another compression method when porting drivers originally written for Win10. Do you understand, there were no drivers specifically written for Vista/7 in ages. All they could do for us, e-waste peasants, at best, at their bench, just hack 'em so they will somehow work on older OS.

Absolutely right! If you would ever need one, I can suggest 4.5 as the highest, not 4.5.1. 4.5 didn't show that much slowness on my 2009 PC.

I specifically wrote about Intel and their employees, for them it's e-waste. It seems you get a bit agitated when it comes to not fully read/understood posts. Again, my PC is way older than yours. I bought it in 2009. For Intel, those two, yours and mine, are e-waste. They won't work and test drivers for our e-waste computers because they aren't paid to do so. Better?

Odd, bad BIOS, or a broken board? Last time I remember the AHCI mode worked better with LGA775 boards in 2006-2007.

You wanted to say Mbit, maybe?

New versions after 4.6.2, or even after 4.5, will slow down a dated PC to a crawl. Did you see the amount of files Net 4.7.2 installs? P.S. More importantly, serious software doesn't need it. I wonder why nVidia doesn't need it, and Intel does, what for? Just to show their primitive/simplistic and ugly UI?

I don't trust any those "new" on-the-bench-hacked Win10 drivers will bring more FPS to an old OS and/or 12-15 years old Vista/XP chipsets. Do you honestly believe Intel employees do real world testing on that e-waste? P.S. I even doubt they have something from over 3-4 years old at their testing lab.

Makes my OS brighter, like it's highlighted by cheap blue leds. Reverting isn't possible, it's uninstallable. Also, the framerates in games drop. It patches way too much files in the OS. And for what purpose, to install a driver?

What about the good ol' TESTSIGNING? bcdedit.exe /set loadoptions DDISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS bcdedit.exe /set TESTSIGNING ON Reboot and install then after the installation bcdedit.exe /set TESTSIGNING OFF reboot again.

D.Draker always knows what he tells. It's official, per the developer. But the question is, why won't they just redirect you to another CDN, as they claim they do.

Means the home IP is clean. P.S. D.Draker always knows what he tells. He has an astonishing military education, was raised in the best French traditions.

One country, which we are here forbidden to even breath towards, not to mention calling its name in relation to anything non-positive, is heavily invested in AdGuard. All engineers, the majority of AdGuard developers and other employees work from that country, but registered in Cyprus. Would you wonder why? It's to avoid any possible sanctions, complications, continue to roam free and spread in the West without consequences. They *of course* don't host their lists on servers in that country, they host on Cloudflare, and you're blocked by Cloudflare, not AdGuard. Why would AdGuard compromise their state mission? Your Cloudflare block was already explained to you, I think by Saxon. You told us you get "Are you a human?" on Cloudflare sites. So, your IP is in a bad list. I'm not getting any restrictions by Cloudflare, all is updated fine.

Many, many games introduce artificial requirements to run on an OS made in 2018 and up. So it's not only the question of hardware. And with old hardware, you're limited to very dated drivers.

All "...Until you want to install a big update". "What I learnt from 3 years of running Windows 11 on “unsupported” PCs" https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/10/what-i-learned-from-3-years-of-running-windows-11-on-unsupported-pcs/

I remember not long ago the normal speed was about 1400 kB/s, it's through a download manager, not browser.

I have a non-modified, original Ti Bios issued only to the press-release and installed only on developer' samples. It has no artificial throttling introduced to the public versions. They usually do it to avoid en masse RMA. I can share.

Wrong, I have a huge collection of Vinyl. Again confused me with someone. Indeed, so why be rude and not appreciative?

My PC is much older, and the card is older, too. Look here for the future. https://msfn.org/board/profile/430186-ddraker/?tab=field_core_pfield_18

Sounds very contradictory. Which means you Soviet made wiring needs to replaced asap.

I indeed come from our Western culture, but you confuse me with someone else, my PC is 15 years old, and the card is over 10. This comment of yours is not particulary friendly, especially of we consider two facts. 1 - I was right about the cheap, old, worn out Soviet wiring. I found you the root cause for free. 2 - I gave you a marvellous advice to make a dedicated power line which feeds only the PC, also for free. All of that being from the culture you obviously don't appreciate much.

I saw @j7n was a gamer.