NotHereToPlayGames
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames
-
Agreed! Time to start a "new game". But how do we decide who WON the first game? Even games that don't keep score have a "winner" and "loser", lol.
-
I'll quote some of your posts here - "did you even read them"? Yeah, "what comes around, goes around".
-
I only see two rules - 1) change one letter to create a NEW WORD 2) you can't repeat an ALREADY USED WORD But yeah, the "foul count" or "balls and strikes" reset when one team starts a new game with a new team. But I see NOTHING that states WHEN a NEW GAME begins or even when somebody actually WINS - be that 20 pages into the game or 20 YEARS into the game.
-
Then we are making up the rules as we go. We see it all the time, "Did you even use the search function before asking your question?", how is this game any different? When I play basketball, I follow rules from before I was ever born. When I play baseball, I follow rules from before I was ever born. You know I'm right, you're making up the rules as we go and then creating "logic" to justify your own paradigm. I'll go ahead and let @XPerceniol and @mina7601 cast the deciding vote.
-
-
With 69 pages, I bet I could find 69 "you lose" links. But nah, I'm not going to, lol.
-
You lose - https://msfn.org/board/topic/102111-change-a-letter-game/?do=findComment&comment=679048
-
You lose - https://msfn.org/board/topic/102111-change-a-letter-game/?do=findComment&comment=679101
-
You lose - https://msfn.org/board/topic/102111-change-a-letter-game/?do=findComment&comment=679293
-
You lose - https://msfn.org/board/topic/102111-change-a-letter-game/?do=findComment&comment=679240
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Be aware that MSFN has an Inner Circle Gang that has somewhat of a "vendetta" against anything Russian (Yandex is Russian). I suggest everyone to do their own DD (Due Dilegence) and decide for themselves if Yandex is "right for them" or not. Run it in a VM, test for yourself. Personally, I have no use for Yandex. But I have never needed to so much as even try it, or Brave, or Vivaldi, or Opera (beyond Legacy v12), et cetera. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Snagit by TechSmith. -
I only use four in Serpent 52 (plus the one "theme"). To be honest, I don't even remember why I have Stylem still installed in my Serpent 52 profile.
-
Holy Crap! I thought my twelve was "too many".
-
My general rule-of-thumb is to NOT enable things like this until I have a regularly visited web site that leads me toward enabling.
-
Unsure if this is the "only" issue or not. But the :is() CSS pseudo-class requires Chrome v88 or higher -- https://caniuse.com/css-matches-pseudo However, note 4 also indicates that enabling the Experimental Web Platform features flag will provide support for :is() in Chrome v68 thru v87.
-
I don't have a Facebook account. Does the error console provide any clues?
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I'm 37 degrees Celsius everywhere I go. Indoors. Outdoors. Traveling. Everywhere. -
I'm on Win10. Both here at home and at work. Work would be a much newer version of Win10. Work is also Pro and not Enterprise. I'm actually "backwards" and use Enterprise at HOME versus at work.
-
Perhaps it's your ISP? I cannot find a QUIC connection anywhere, at home or at work. I've done nothing to disable QUIC in the test profile.
-
My test above was without any login.
-
I'm unsure if QUIC is being disabled at the "IT Level" as that test was from at work. I do know that I don't have it disabled at the "browser level", at least not here at work.
-
Cannot replicate here in the US. At least not in Ungoogled Chromium v114.
-
I do agree, unsafe, not for me. Don't care if it's Google QUIC or non-Google QUIC - neither is for me. But no, I did not vote, nor plan to. Some topics seem to only exist for the sake of Provocateur Extraordinaire - this one has already unfolded as such so I'll leave it to "you two" to duke it out, "not for me".
-
I'm not quite understanding the underlying hostility? The voting is 100% (at time of post) "I don't, and not going to. I think it's unsafe." so doesn't that tell us that you have both voted the same exact "it's unsafe"?