
NotHereToPlayGames
MemberContent Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames
-
Can you show a pic of your "help about"? ie, what CHROME ENGINE are you getting this on? I cannot get this "out of date" banner/notification/blob even with 360Chrome 13.5 which only uses CHROME ENGINE v86! So Supermium has BROKEN something internally because sourceforge doesn't throw this. As you've said, it's been asked many times, I have yet to EVER witness/confirm/verify ANY of these. My theory is that this is OPERATING SYSTEM. The notification is just GENERIC and says "browser" but IT IS NOT THE BROWSER THAT IT DOESN'T LIKE. That's my theory.
-
Will give that a try. Never heard of it, to be honest.
- 699 replies
-
- uBlock Origin
- Legacy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Confused. At any rate, no longer matters. WinRAR worked. But do PREFER 7zip so I'll try again. Not really urgent.
- 699 replies
-
- uBlock Origin
- Legacy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
So your 7zip kept this folder structure? Mine did not. Did not dig into "why" it did not. I grabbed a "portable WinRAR" and it worked.
- 699 replies
-
- uBlock Origin
- Legacy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Duh! I typed it that way intentionally, because I was quoting "forgotten "Ci" in the code" and felt I should reference it within my reply. Technically, I only looked for "browser.webNavigation". Come to find out that the reason I couldn't find it is because WinRAR and 7zip extract omni.ja differently. I probably "should have" known that, it was specifically cited to use WinRAR but it's not something I have installed on my HOST, had to resort to a VM.
- 699 replies
-
- uBlock Origin
- Legacy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
The file structures inside omni.ja are of course different for New Moon 28 and Serpent 52. I could not find any missing browser.webNavigation.stop(Ci.nsIWebNavigation.STOP_ALL); in Serpent 52.
- 699 replies
-
- uBlock Origin
- Legacy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ublock Origin Lite (MV3) vs AdGuard MV3 Chromium Extensions
NotHereToPlayGames replied to a topic in Web Browsers
No. I never even knew that ghacks even had a sponsored content section. I had to fire up a VM just to see WHERE the sponsored content is even "supposed to be". -
Try killing/terminating from Task Manager / Process Explorer / Process Hacker instead.
- 699 replies
-
- uBlock Origin
- Legacy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Works for me. I'm curious as well. What is breaking for those extensions is very likely the same root-cause for certain themes to also break.
- 699 replies
-
- uBlock Origin
- Legacy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Then why this ping to Roytam? Rhetorical question. Any answer will likely be seen as "talking out of both sides of your mouth". No worries, "carry on".
- 699 replies
-
- uBlock Origin
- Legacy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
To me, these two statements contradict each other. But yes, all hinges on "constant ad nauseum updates that is a full time job to keep up with" and many/most extensions pertinent to UXP Era are no longer maintained.
- 699 replies
-
- uBlock Origin
- Legacy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Agreed! Agreed! Agreed! I had this problem (ression restore broken but only with a specific "Photonic" theme) in Serpent 52. Photonic theme should not break the session restore feature of Serpent 52 - but it DOES in "newer" versions of Serpent 52. I have opted to intentionally leave my Serpent 52 at 2023-07-31 because session restore WORKS in that version, regardless of what extensions or themes I throw at it. 2023-07-31 became my "end of the line" for Serpent 52. Use it DAILY for text messaging. My XP (Acer Aspire One POS) has had to resort to Mypal 68 but even it hasn't exactly restored "life" to that POS. So YEAH, I'm glad that you have found "more" because when I cited my Photonic theme breaking session restore, that discussion only "ended" in folks citing that session restore works in newer Serpent 52 without any extensions (duh, that wasn't the issue).
- 699 replies
-
- uBlock Origin
- Legacy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
XP/Vista-compatible clients for modern email services?
NotHereToPlayGames replied to Mathwiz's topic in Windows XP
Not true. But read/interpret what you want. That is basically what Roytam said. I wonder if it came across as an "angry disposition"? -
XP/Vista-compatible clients for modern email services?
NotHereToPlayGames replied to Mathwiz's topic in Windows XP
I basically asked the same thing many many months ago. Bottom line, it isn't, and even Roytam agrees that it isn't. But some people think that since their computer is x64, then "everything" on it should also be x64. "To each their own", of course. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Interesting! But for me, that last clip isn't a suggested clip but rather it is part of the playlist. So I suspect your suggested list just repeated an item already in the playlist. But yes, auto-play does "initiate" to play the next SUGGESTION, but the loop button kicks in and reverts to "track 1" instead. However, in my test-case, it didn't "initiate" to play the "very next" SUGGESTION, but it started to play Suggestion #3 but the loop-to-track-1 does work. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
<del, duplicate> -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Although, um, , when I was researching and adding my own "toggle button" for the loop, I discovered that this feature ALREADY EXISTS and it is already toggleable via this button - -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Working. Thanks. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
<OT but since YT is hot topic at moment> Does anyone know of a script that REPEATS the same play list over and over? If there are 10 songs in the list, go back to "track 1" after "track 10" is played INSTEAD OF YouTube going to the "next" playlist? -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I'm quite convinced that YouTube will "survive" just fine if half a million users jump through hoops to go AD-FREE. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I hear ya. YouTube has been on a TERROR for the last six months or so in regards to not allowing ad-blockers. I've changed combinations of extensions three or four times this year all on account of YouTube ads. I can only laugh at myself because until I became an MSFN member, I was never a YouTube user. I used to burn my own cd's, upload to Dropbox or Google Drive, and play those at work. Nowadays, I do use YouTube - and yeah, it's like a "second job" just to keep up with tweaking it, lol. My config plays YouTube AD-FREE !!! And yeah, "Hello YouTube, if you are listening", IT WILL STAY THAT WAY !!! "Challenge Accepted!" -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Um, I guess I find that hard to believe. You don't even block *ADS* on YouTube? -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Thanks, good catch. I posted that during my morning breakfast-time just before leaving for work. That's actually another reason for me to *NOT* want to use this as a default config. I want my tweaks and edits "locally owned and operated". -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I've abandoned this already for here at work. It is extremely advantageous for all users to have alternatives (especially the "pre-10" folks). But for Win10, I cannot bring myself to using anything Mozilla-based. Everyone is going to have their own pros and cons, of course. The Turbo Launcher seems to work (missing some menu on/off buttons but did not track down root cause) even for Chromium-based, but still "not for me" and I prefer the *regular ol' YouTube* with my regular ol' YouTube fixes. We can definitely ALL AGREE that YouTube without any fixes or extensions or user scripts or user styles is garbage, lol. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
And I shouldn't "tempt fate", but it appears that Turbo Launcher also means I no longer need ad-blockers on YouTube. The real test will be at work. Which will also be the test for "are you still here" auto-pause.