NotHereToPlayGames

Updated download for v13.0 and v13.5 in first post. edit - hard-coding out some default search engines (which do not appear unless you use your own "Web Data" [this file contains profile settings, not telemetry, so should not be deleted as a means towards preventing telemetry] file or your file somehow becomes corrupted [or you deleted it thinking it contained telemetry]) is still in-process and did not make it into this update.

According to @VistaLover the answer is "no". I've never tried because I hate auto-updates. For reference, here is VistaLover's post -- https://msfn.org/board/topic/182304-extreme-explorer-360-chromium-78-86-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=1166078

The "ungoogled" versions definitely do not auto-update. I'm not sure on the "regular" versions. I personally hate auto-update so I've never "tried" to automatically update any of my extensions. I also personally prefer to use older versions of most of my extensions. Probably should say all because I don't even look for manual updates after I create my profile.

I guess that kinda doesn't surprise me. Somewhere WAAYYY back then, I stopped using Chromium and migrated to official Pale Moon (then to New Moon, then to Mypal) because I'm an XP-user. And nothing ticks me off more than a program's GUI that does NOT have XP-style title bar and min/max/restore/close icons. Seems minor, I know, but it's actually kind of a big deal to me

Fair enough. It was an honest mistake, I care ZERO about this and didn't take the time to "quote" word for word, letter for letter. Because, no offense, NOBODY CARES. There is no "prize" being handed out for "winning" this MEANINGLESS conversation. I yield the floor for you to have the last word, I spend too much time on the forum as-is without this thread, you can have it

Agreed. This whole 'incident' was a "nothing" (less than nothing!) in my book. But I did find some mole hills for you.

It's "over and done with" as far as I'm concerned. I've moved on, I wasn't offended at the time nor now. Certainly wasn't worth my time to scroll back a page or two for an "exact" quote, lol. I feel like this thread should be "locked", everybody has said their piece and I don't see the need to prolong the discussion. "Over and done with." Moving on.

I've used the word much differently so I personally did not feel attacked. If you look at my history of using that word, never once have I ever directed it at anyone specifically. In one instance, I referred to MYSELF as a "geeky dude". In the other instances, they were of "generalities", not "at" anyone in particular. I do think it is very different to start a sentence off with "Dude, did you even read" because in this context, "dude" and "you" is specifically being directed at "one person". I would have felt under attack if I felt that sentence was directed "at me". All in CONTEXT and CONTEXT doesn't always come across in WRITTEN FORM.

For those that prefer the Tampermonkey route, I no longer use this and prefer to block fonts by default with NoScript then use a "Clean Font Families" Tampermonkey script for the very few fonts that NoScript cannot block because they're not sourced externally. I don't recall where this originally came from and I know I've edited it since then, but this is the script I used to use to replace problematic fonts -

Yep, we got it figured out. As for your learning curve, I only use five extensions and three of them can fix Digital Spy fonts all by itself. 1) Easiest -- NoScript -- block fonts on gstatic.com 2) Medium difficulty -- Stylus -- unset body font-family 3) Hardest -- Tampermonkey -- replace "libre franklin" font-family with any font of your preference

It's been years since I've used it but I do seem to recall that I had to create the folder, that it did not exist by default. I cannot say if this will work though, it was pre-v49 that I've used it. I quickly turned into a Stylem/Stylus "junkie" and can't live without it.

In past versions of Chromium, I used this folder ~/.config/chromium/Default/User StyleSheets/Custom.css the same as {Profile}\Chrome\userContent.css file in Firefox. But I have not personally tried that in 360Chrome.

Which extensions are you using? Perhaps we can find a fix using only those extensions. edit - and which 360Chrome version is your preference?

@UCyborg Agreed. It certainly affects v11 more than other versions. Another test site presented very early in the thread is https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/ However, most of us (including me) that use v11 as our default-for-everything-browser have extremely valid reasons for using v11 over v13. Font issues that are easily fixable on three web sites out of the three thousand web sites that I have visited so far this year alone isn't going to be even a thumbtack let alone a nail in v11's coffin

Best route is via Stylus and a style sheet with something like "body {font-family: unset !important;" and that basically is the equivalent of unchecking the box in the Inspector.

I'm quite sure that they don't. Factory computers.

Updated download for v11 in first post.

This computer has an Nvidia GeForce GT 635. But I've witnessed that font-blur crap on hundreds of computers. The factory floor has 350+ computers, they all do that font-blur crap!

And those "colors" are there on your end whether you post your screencaps as jpg (where we can see all the colors) or as png (which hides those colors from us [alpha-blending?]). It's actually totally amazed me over the years on how RARE my eyesight is. There were people that tried to sue Microsoft when they pushed "cleartype". But only a very small percentage of the population can "see" the PROBLEMS with "cleartype".

Disable "libre franklin" font family and that web site displays correctly.

The Digital Spy problems all revolve around their use of a font called "libre franklin". My default settings block it via NoScript. The font is coming from gstatic.com and I disable gstatic fonts by default. Blocking that font also corrects the italics for Doctor Who. With that font allowed - With that font blocked -

Firefox does it also! My eyesight sees that crap without zooming in. It's "anti-aliasing" and it's ENABLED by default on most systems.

Definitely looks better!

I have pretty decent luck with fonts on my XP. But I do have to jump through some hoops to disable any and ALL "cleartype" and "anti-aliasing" and "sub-pixel" B&LLSH!T. When Win7 first came out, I landed in an MRI machine because of the MIGRAINES due to Win7's "cleartype" fonts! I've disabled "Segoe UI" ever since. Win10's default fonts don't give me migraines but I still disable "Segoe UI" at all costs. If fonts on my system rendered like the below screencap posted by Dave-H, I would be outside throwing that computer around so much that I'd be in prison for ten years for the massive disturbance of the peace I would be making. This looks absolutely HORRENDOUS. I count at least SIX unique colors for what is supposed to be rendered as "black" !!!

You should be able to edit the Clean Font Families with an // @exclude for your youtube URL. I'm not seeing any icon font squares on my end. What section of an MSFN page are you seeing that? Maybe an // @exclude entry for MSFN will also work best for you. edit - disregard, you did say the font square were only with your previous extension and that the Tampermonkey script solved that issue.