NotHereToPlayGames

I never wear a seatbelt if I'm only IN TOWN. Law be d@mned! It's "illegal" in the US to drive without a seatbelt. DO NOT CARE! I do not wear a seatbelt if I'm only IN TOWN. And do NOT feed me the BS that 40mph plus 40mph = 80mph. IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY. Only thing that EVER happens IN TOWN are "fender benders" and NOT "fatality" types of accidents - PERIOD! Sure, somebody is going to cite an exception, as an exception can always be found. SEATBELTS ARE POINTLESS FOR IN-TOWN DRIVING!

Piece of junk web site! My life has been fine without "nitter".

Is "CTR" a what or a who?

Confirmed, I've always used Stylem to customize NM27 and NM28.

I don't have any use for "nitter" but as far as testing, I have to disable NoScript and uMatrix, load the page, then re-enable and all works fine - even without setting any special non-default NoScript/uMatrix site-specific "nitter". Seems to me to be very much related to extensions. Chrome and Mozilla both have a flaw, from my experience, that a disabled extension does NOT BEHAVE THE SAME as the same extension enabled but with site-specific rules set to "trust/bypass". Chrome and Mozilla both also have the flaw, from my experience, that an INCOGNITO WINDOW does NOT BEHAVE THE SAME when an extension is disabled versus enabled! Too difficult to log specific cases, but I'd swear that I've seen this behavior over the years in both Chrome and Mozilla browsers - INCOGNITO mode will react DIFFERENTLY when an extension is ENABLED versus DISABLED. Even though INCOGNITO mode "should" behave as if all extensions are DISABLED (unless, of course, you opt-in for allow in Incognito). Do not assume that Incognito mode is the same thing as disabling all extensions!

My joke on my '55 Dodge and '61 Studebaker isn't about their lack of seat belts or airbags, but rather that they both have close to half a dozen ash trays but no cup holders.

I was never really a fan of Basilisk. Everything on the web I've ever needed would always work in NM27 / NM28 / BNav. Well, until recent year or so and I've needed Chromium-based. What am I missing that's supposed to be so special about Basilisk?

To Moonchild - Just read your "A change of direction for Pale Moon in 2022" thread in its entirety. BRAVO! I look forward to the new direction!

That's one of the reasons I never install addons directly from the Chrome Web Store. I download the .crx, exract it, remove all non-English location files, browse through .js files for possible phone-home URLS, repackage the .crx, then drag-and-drop into 360Chrome.

Working for me.

Test works for me in v11. I don't think msfntor was claiming otherwise, he did have a question mark at the end when he posted that.

I tend to NOT use the "latest-and-greatest" version of most of my extensions ON PURPOSE. Newer often times just means a newer "feature" was added. But if that "feature" is a security/privacy risk, then all you did was shoot yourself in the foot thinking "it's newer, it has to be better". Flags: --disable-logging --no-default-browser-check --disable-component-update --disable-background-networking --allow-outdated-plugins --kiosk-printing --disable-print-preview --cipher-suite-blacklist=0xe013 --disable-webgl --js-flags=--noexpose_wasm I do NOT use any uMatrix/uBlock "lists" (one that I used to use is still listed in my profile but unchecked). I use MVPS HOSTS file but tend to only update once every six months or so. A ton of site-specific uMatrix and NoScript rules not included below. I rarely visit YouTube but since it has such a gigantic following amongst MSFN members I have two extensions just for a site I almost never visit.

Maybe it's one of those tests that if you run it 4 different times, you get 3 different results ???

Working fine... I will not allow TWO .js domains when the test will run with only ONE .js domain... It is SELF-FULFULLING PROPHECY to "lower your shields" just to run a "test"... The flag mentioned earlier INCREASED my reds from FOUR to FIVE.

I confess that I've been ignoring this thread as just another one of those "too paranoid for me" types of tests. (to each their own...) But I finally ran it in my v11 and I'm happy with only FOUR reds without making any flag changes.

JUST THE WAY I LIKE IT I allow JS on my banking and billpay, but the vast majority of the rest of my browsing experience is for READING the content on a web site, which works perfectly fine without JS BS (not "always", but good enough for me, I'll just go to a DIFFERENT source where I can READ the content without JS BS).

Calling it "deadly" is "fear mongering", if I may be so bold!

I patiently await @feodor2's "Mypal 2.0". NONE of Roytam's builds will work on one of my savings/IRA account web sites (in XP, 7, or 10!) so that alone kinda makes them all useless to me. I used to do that for years, maintain one browser for these web sites, maintain another browser for those web sites, I have zero interest in doing that anymore, life is too short. I miss when Mypal 27.9.4 performed everything I threw at it Hopefully "Mypal 2.0" (or whatever it's going to be called) will return me to Firefox-based. TBD edit - and NONE of Roytam's builds will work for my American Water billpay web site (in XP, 7, or 10!).

4 vs 5 columns wasn't the solution afterall. The d@mn resize-on-hover preview is back. Any suggestions? I'm fine with the autoplay preview, but I really hate it RESIZING!

Too funny! Yeah, I saw it, liked it, sent to family and friends, then I guess I accidentally went full-circle and posted here without realizing here is where I got it, lol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpLVbVWpQRc

Fun with optical illusions -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBap_Lp-0oc

Disregard, I found a solution. The previews do not enlarge when I force only 4 columns of thumbnails (my widescreen resolution defaults to 5 columns).

Can anybody help in finding the css selector(s) for YouTube to NOT increase the SIZE of the video when you hover over it with the mouse? PLAY the video is FINE, but to ENLARGE it just because my mouse is hovering over it is a d@mn NUISANCE and I can't find the css selector to disable this NUISANCE. Many thanks in advance.