NotHereToPlayGames

Doesn't mean a dang thing! Or very limited at best. GitHub has a section to show green squares for how "active" the author is. Feodor2's projects have always been sparse and have historically gone several weeks between "contributions".

Do either of these two errors suggest a polyfill fix? Or might these be on the fly transpiling also? {"rootCause":null,"stackTrace":"TypeError: Cannot read property 'onBeforeRenderBtn' of undefined\n at Object.eval (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcore/vulcanuxcore.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:179861)\n at JSON.parse (<anonymous>)\n at Function.Ki.initJSFunctions (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcore/vulcanuxcore.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:179658)\n at nia.getUIControlConfig (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcontrols/vulcanuxcontrols.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:427736)\n at eval (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcontrols/vulcanuxcontrols.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:427092)\n at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)\n at nia.initialize (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcontrols/vulcanuxcontrols.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:426690)\n at WRb.getContainerConfig (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcontrols/vulcanuxcontrols.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:1170692)\n at WRb.buildComponentConfig (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcontrols/vulcanuxcontrols.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:1169671)\n at eval (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcontrols/vulcanuxcontrols.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:1169365)","detailedMessage":"error in layout configuration menuHeaderId"} {"rootCause":null,"stackTrace":"TypeError: Cannot read property 'onBeforeCustomerTestPaegeLoad' of undefined\n at Object.eval (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcore/vulcanuxcore.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:179861)\n at JSON.parse (<anonymous>)\n at Function.Ki.initJSFunctions (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcore/vulcanuxcore.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:179658)\n at Function.ua.handleComponentEvent (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcore/vulcanuxcore.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:233219)\n at _Kb.loadSolutionPage (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcontrols/vulcanuxcontrols.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:1133118)\n at _Kb.loadDefaultPage (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcontrols/vulcanuxcontrols.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:1130876)\n at _Kb.handlePageChangeByAction (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcontrols/vulcanuxcontrols.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:1131286)\n at SafeSubscriber.eval [as _next] (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/@apporchid/vulcanuxcore/vulcanuxcore.umd.min.js?v=@2.3.0:1:36068)\n at SafeSubscriber.__tryOrUnsub (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/rxjs/Subscriber.js?v=@2.3.0:242:16)\n at SafeSubscriber.next (https://mywaterv2.amwater.com/node_modules/rxjs/Subscriber.js?v=@2.3.0:189:22)","detailedMessage":"Error in loading solution page from response"} Those are the two errors my water bill pops up in a details-box. It's the ONLY site I visit monthly that "requires" 360Chrome v13 or higher

Piece of cake! Got 'er loaded. I think I tried this before but I neglected to test on known URLs and inadvertently dropped it, oops. Found it ironic that I need the chromefill in order to download the chromefill (in Chrome-based v69) via GitHub

Looks easy enough. Will do as time permits.

I'll say, "No, it doesn't mean anything of significance." Maybe it could "in the future" but I ran official Pale Moon 28, latest New Moon 28, and official Pale Moon 30 in several benchmark tests and all tests basically showed the same. That being official 28 and 30 being basically equivalent in scores and New Moon scoring slightly worse. edit - I did have to disable WebGL in all three because all three would crash on various benchmark tests with WebGL enabled. Win7 with Intel i3.

Ah, I guess I assumed it to be a simple match-and-replace. No logic required for simple match-and-replace.

I use Proxomitron for this purpose.

I'm a bit at a loss. "How" do I use this? What is the "your extension" being referenced and "how" do I use that also? I'm asking specifically towards 360Chrome v11 - I have very limited interest in any browser "newer" than 360Chrome v11.

I'm using a v69 (late 2018) and it works for 90% or so of everything I've thrown at it. Regarding the other 10%, and to be as blunt as possible, "nobody cares". I mean that towards the web masters running those 10% of web sites - "none of them care". As much as we (myself included) "live in the past", we are unrealistic to expect web masters to remain in the past. Web masters know what browsers are visiting their web site. They know that for every 10,000 visits, they have 1 using a four-year old web browser or a twenty-year old operating system. LIFE GOES ON if they "lose" that ONE visitor. Plain and simple.

I'm up to NINE computers and they are all i3 or older except for one i7. Hardware acceleration does NOT work on any of them! I have ZERO performance gain with hardware acceleration and TONS of graphics issues when I enable it. 9 times out of 10, if you have issues you are researching, the FIRST suggestion is ALWAYS to "disable hardware acceleration". I personally would never suggest anybody to enable hardware acceleration - "mileage may vary".

Is there an AWD model?

I cannot find any references to that address in chrome.dll. I suppose it could be some "certificate update" but I block any-and-all "certificate crap" on my computer, it's a broken system and I feel more "secure" WITHOUT IT.

Still doing some digging. Limited resources at the moment, visiting dad out-of-state and not at my own computer.

I have been unable to replicate this in my "regular" as-is v13.5. If it doesn't exist in "regular", there's no way for it to exist in "ungoogled".

None of 360Chrome (not the official Chinese, not the Russian Repack, not my rebuild, not Humming Owl's rebuils) is compatible with Chrome Web Store themes.

The above is a quote from @Dave-H in a different thread. I would like to ask for Ad Revenue to be made public if this web site is now going to have constant "banners" requesting members to "donate". I seek not to overstep my bounds and will cease-and-decist at request. I just think that the constant "banners" is a bit over-the-top and we-the-members herein should have a better "overall picture" of "costs" we are being asked to cover. Again, I am not seeking to overstep my bounds, I have been here since December 2019, making me relatively "new" here. But the question begs to be asked - if we-the-members fully and wholly cover the "costs", then we should also consider REMOVING the "ads" - ALL of them. Just thinking out loud...

I'm unsure how "honest" we are supposed to be. The topic of "donations" have been front-and-center as of late. I sincerely hope we-the-members do not become "at risk" of being banned simply on grounds of discussing said "donations". Against that "backdrop", I have never, in my entire life, "donated" to a web site. That does not imply that I never will. I DO have a small list of political and religious affiliations that I DO "donate" towards. But I generally call them "contributions", not "donations". I cannot, in good faith, "donate" towards a "technical" web site with political rants running amok. That's just me. But perhaps other "silent" members as well. That said, we-the-members should have a full account of "expenses" and of "advertising income" if we are going to have banner after banner requesting we "donate".

Hmm, interesting. I'll see if I can replicate (I've never personally trusted anything higher than v13 build 2206, to be honest). Do you still see this first-tab connection if all extensions are disabled?

Noted, might be a few weeks before I can did into it and see if I can find the culprit.

I have registered over there as ArcticFoxie and will include my builds over there also. Time will tell if MSFN is truly shutting down (WinCert had one of these shut-down scares in 2017, RyanVM had one in 2019 - both are still here).

I can't speak for MSFN specifically, but I've moderatored forums in the past and the Donations "progress bar" was quarterly.

I personally hold the view that we've already had WW3, WW4, and WW5 and this would be WW6.

Same here. I've even had folks follow me into a parking lot to "say their piece". I just calmly reply, "Green means Go. Green does not mean Gun It." You have to be careful, they clearly have "road rage" if they followed you into a parking lot. So it's in the "delivery" that I can get them to CHUCKLE and admit that Green means Go.

No plans as of yet. I don't know what "soon" means as far as the MSFN closure (or if it's even 100% as of this point). Maybe users need to start posting links to other forums where we can continue into the future as folks of (mostly) common interests? I haven't dug too deep into this. I personally feel that New Moon and Serpent are "dying" (I say this as a supporting fan with continued hopes toward the contrary). It's not like Dropbox is some never-heard-of web site - I use it for "business" and reserve my Google Drive for "personal". Dropbox doesn't require users to be "members" to download, you can download without a username/password. The notion that Dropbox doesn't work in New Moon and Serpent only reinforces my own belief that they are "dying" (if not already on life support).