NotHereToPlayGames

Not this thread but on the other one, I wonder if a "poll" would be helpful? I'm thinking more along the lines of removing any bias and sticking with undeniable hard-core data. If the "poll" voted by all MSFN Members following the thread has Kaspersky in the top 3 or 5 or so, then we should use real data to assist MSFN Members to use it or not. I'd be willing to run the top 3 or 5 or so and do "quantitative analysis" (in a VM only!) for hard-core data, which consumes more RAM, which scans a 20 MB reference .zip file the fastest, which slows the install of an Office Suite the slowest, which effects PC Startup Time the most, numbers like that are important to me.

Chrome did not require SSE3 until v89. Since 360Chrome v13.5 is forked from Chrome v86, the SSE3 flag should not be an issue.

I am not quite sure I understand the question nor what prompted it to be asked. I'll offer some thoughts up as "rules of thumb" and allow others to chime in from that. 1) If you have more than 2 or 3 posts back-to-back with nobody else chiming in, then consider the possibility that you are "talking to yourself". 2) Always remember that you are writing to a human being that does the reading, you're not talking to your keyboard or your computer monitor. 3) Remember that this is a discussion forum and not a "blog". A blog (in my view) is somebody "talking to himself" with an occassional reply. 4) Read before hitting the submit button and ask yourself, "Am I being informative or am I being spiteful?" (ie, don't submit something with the agenda of causing an online "flame war") 5) Remember that you don't have to have the last word in order to have the last word. Readers can read and know when the discussion is over but people just keep replying for the sake of having the "last word". 6) Remember that you don't always have to be "right". You can present your point and let the reader decide. 7) Excessive underlines, bold, and italics ALL OVER THE PLACE in a post comes across (at times, not always) as AGGRESSIVE, often even RUDE, and can be DISTRACTING and CONFUSING (at times, not always).

waka waka waka bread, breed... it's all the same, lol

We are definitely a dying bread. There are more than three of us. I think what a lot of visitors forget is that XP today is a lot like 98 x-number of years ago. By that I mean that 7 and 10 folks don't visit 98 threads and remind them that they run an insecure OS - but they will to an XP thread. Makes no sense to me.

lol. I'm on Season 6 on Hulu. A lot of Justice League references but no Batman yet. Which is odd because there would be no Justice League without Batman.

No clue why my name was brought up. No clue whatsoever. A rib-jab, perhaps? So I shall only add this, as I have also stated in the past - a web browser's "padlock" in the address bar is a "false sense of security", plain and simple. ESPECIALLY for the XP crowd! Regardless if you jumped through hoops to "update" certificates or not. XP can not handle modern SSL technology and you can't "hack" XP to do so. That "padlock" can be FAKED at the browser level to totally IGNORE "secure or not" at the Operating System level - the browser itself can put whatever padlock it so chooses (I have witnessed this in Chrome forks, but I suspect FAKES [can] exist in Firefox forks also). A "padlock" at the browser level indicates nothing at the Operating System level - no matter what OS you are on. A "padlock" at the browser level indicates nothing at the DNS level - Catsxp demonstrates that one really well, a lot of DNS traffic if-and-only-if you use its built-in DoH "security feature". I shall remind all that 360Chrome on XP was never intended to "extend" the life of XP - it was only intended to function as a stop-gap for XP users to skip directly over Vista and 7 and jump straight to 10, not 11 or 12, but 10. I've stated that in the past and I still believe that - 360Chrome is a stop-gap, nothing more, nothing less. My preferred browser-of-choice (and as also stated, browser selection is always always ALWAYS a matter of personal CHOICE) nowadays is Marmaduke Ungoogled Chromium v112, nothing newer, nothing older - on Win 10. Hope that will be enough to clear the mud.

Agreed, as dark and scary as it sounds, I too think the paranoia is justified. My only frame of reference is my little Midwest USA town. I am well-traveled across Mexico-USA-Canada (have also been to China, Taiwan, and Japan), but I'll use my "average" Midwest USA town as reference. I live a teeny-tiny-miniscule just-under 0.6 miles (0.97 kilometers) from three grocery stores and just under 0.4 miles (0.64 kilometers) from two fast food locations to the south and three fast food locations to the north. I have three gas stations all within 0.7 miles (1.13 kilometers) and one of them is within 0.3 miles (0.48 kilometers). With everything that close and no longer having a gym membership, I use the close proximity to all of these conveniences for WALKING to and from. It's obviously not the same as running that 7- or 8-minute mile at the gym, but this WALK is a h#ll of a lot more than what our "lazy society" has befallen to. 0.6 miles (0.97 kilometers) - this really is just WALKING DISTANCE. I'm talking edge of town Midwest, not metropolitan inner-city. I'm a shirt-and-tie mid-engineering salaried corporate-type with a military-style haircut and always clean-shaven. I'm not talking 1950s versus 2020s, but the world has changed - and the change is a bit scary! At least here in the Midwest USA, you only have to think back to the mid- to late-90s and you had a society where rollerblading and biking and hiking were very popular recreational activities. Nowadays, especially post-covid, a clean-shaven shirt-and-tie salaried-career-oriented law-abiding doesn't-drink doesn't-smoke member of society can not even WALK a mere 0.6 miles without id-iots in cars shouting out their windows. You get people shouting out their window calling me a "meth-head" just because I chose to WALK a teeny-tiny-miniscule 0.6 miles, with a spoon in my pocket, to buy some ice cream, and eat that ice cream during the return walk home. You get people shouting profanities and accusing me of being "homeless" - I paid off my 20yr mortgage in THREE YEARS. You get people flipping me off and telling me to buy a car - I have SIX vehicles and none of them have a car loan. I've often wanted to make a t-shirt that reads, "Yes, I have a car. I'm walking because I want to!" That's where society is these days, recreational activities no longer include a pair of rollerblades (I still have mine) or mountain biking. Our society's recreational activity has befallen to assuming anybody and everybody that WALKS along a sidewalk is a drug user and a homeless burden to society. My only burden is that I pay more taxes then these people shouting profanities out their "winter beater" and assume I'm homeless simply because I chose to WALK to pick up that ice cream snack.

This works at least in the case of https://www.gwr.com/ // ==UserScript== // @name Inject Object.hasOwn Polyfill // @version 0.0.1 // @match *://*/* // @run-at document-start // @grant none // ==/UserScript== if (!Object.hasOwn) { Object.defineProperty(Object, "hasOwn", { value: function (object, property) { if (object == null) { throw new TypeError("Cannot convert undefined or null to object") } return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(Object(object), property) }, configurable: true, enumerable: false, writable: true }) } Source: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-accessible-object-hasownproperty/blob/main/polyfill.js Another read: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69561596/object-hasown-vs-object-prototype-hasownproperty

lol, a bad habit. I generally jump straight to making a site "readable" and I can do that most of the time just by blocking scripts or letting a few in without letting all in. I wonder of Object.hasOwn() can be injected the same way we inject structuredClone?

It's not an obsession. It was an attempt to correlate a fine-line parallel in a friendly manner. In your view, I failed. But agreed, an international forum has to decide for itself which country laws pertain to forum content. MSFN does not allow direct links to these projects so I follow MSFN's lead in that regard. We are allowed to disagree with each other, you do know that, don't you? Moving on, I was attempting some middle ground but your reply clearly did not see it that way. We are not all always going to agree with each other, plain and simple. I do continue to have a vested interest in just how will Chrome continue on Win7, so I won't be far away, this is a valid and useful thread.

You EXCLUDED me the moment you included POSReady Updates. (ie, it's not a "5 minute test" if I have to violate my principles, hack my registry, install all POSReady Updates, then report on Glarysoft's Quick Startup) If you want to be technical (at least in my view, likely not yours, lol), you are only a "real" XP user if you did not "patch" it to enable POSReady. I am a REAL XP user, I'm not talking VMs though I run XP in VMs also. x64 on this desktop machine, x86 on my secondary desktop machine. I have abandoned XP on my "fairly new" laptops and all of them run Win10 LTSB 2016.

Found the culprit. It is this script - www.gwr.com/_next/static/chunks/main-a1ce463ca4bb7b12.js Figures it had to be the "main" .js as the web site doesn't really "do" anything without it.

Could also be this script -

The problem is going to be in one of these scripts. I can dig into it deeper over the weekend but I'd start with just blocking one at a time via uMatrix/uBlock and see if that restores website functionality.

ps - that web site may be a RECORD - 272 CSS declarations, 271 of them all inline style sheets.

I don't recall what the problem was with LNER. For GWR, the problem is script-related. My default config has the page "almost" working but 15 of 17 inline scripts are blocked. Enabling all 15 of the blocked scripts results in a page error. I suspect that the fix is relatively easy but it will likely either require Proxomitron to filter the incoming javascript before the web browser renders it OR maybe just blocking one or two or so of those 15 inline scripts via uMatrix/uBlock.

In all versions of Windows, you can hold down the SHIFT key while pressing the DELETE key and that deletes the files without going to the Recycle Bin first. I've always HATED the "recycle bin", it forces us to delete everything TWICE.

D.Draker - we are on the same page on this one, "personality conflicts" aside. Honestly, we really are. But as I read kar1's comments, I have to agree with him as well. There is a "fine line" and it is all "relative" (or is "subjective" a better word?) on just when and where that line is crossed. I am not trying to go off-topic and it is kind of all tied together. For one, the future of Chrome on Win7 is likely (I reiterate "likely", this is purely speculative) going to follow the lead of what the XP Crowd has been doing since Chrome abandoned XP. ie, one or two years behind. There is decompiling, recompiling, backporting, debug, dependency checks, trial-and-error, et cetera - "software doesn't write itself". Will that workflow "work" for the Win7 Crowd? Only time will tell. It is all "speculative" as soon as the word "future" enters the scene. There is also "intended audience" if this Future Chrome on Win7 is going to gain true traction. What I perceive a "car" to be in the future may very well differ from what you perceive a "car" to be in the future - it's all speculative... and subjective... Secondly, I propose that we have to view the previously-mentioned browser and in turn the previously-mentioned web site the same way we (MSFN) views Extended Kernels. I guarantee that Microsoft does not view an Extended Kernel in the same way that the end-consumer views an Extended Kernel. And unless I'm mistaken, even MSFN Forum Rules do not allow "links" to Extended Kernels (I could be wrong on this, this falls back on "intended audience" and I do not use Extended Kernels nor follow those MSFN Threads). But MSFN does allow us all to use the phrase "extended kernel" even though it may be indexed by search engines. You see how that "fine line" comes into play? Does the Future of Chrome on Win7 force the intended audience to utilize an Extended Kernel? Or will traction only be gained by giving in to the demands of the Vanilla Win7 Crowd and the Future of Chrome on Win7 not require an Extended Kernel? Only time will tell... And have a great day, my friend, and note that I strived to word this reply without triggering any "personality conflicts"

Not until Boston Legal came along and portrayed a character with Aspergers. The character (Jerry "Hands" Espenson) is played by actor Christian Clemenson. Dan Aykroyd, Daryl Hannah, Anthony Hopkins, and some doctors suggest Andy Warhol also all have Aspergers. Or more recently called Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).

Perhaps this is of help -- https://iot.stackexchange.com/questions/2160/windows-10-iot-on-regular-pc

Same here. Though minor and non-medicated. I am one of only a few here at work that has computer speakers, Pluto TV, streaming radio, and YouTube access because "background noise" keeps me 'focused'. So I guess I kind of have "exploited" the minor ADHD but my boss knows the difference in my efficiency when I do and do not have that "background noise". I've also been suggested via "medical advise" to drink Mountain Dew because caffiene kinda of has the opposite effect on me as it does most people.

Technically, no, you cannot! It does have a link to GitHub for a something called a "warez" as some sort of "warez". But it does not HOST whatever a "warez" is - GitHub is doing the hosting. Semantics, I guess. MSFN does not blanket-ban GitHub links, regardless of the wide array of content, legal or otherwise, hosted via GitHub. At any rate, I still advise the poster to learn from my mistake and remove the link to Thorium's main website.

That was my mistake. Other forum member(s) were asking about Thorium, I did a 10-second Google, and posted the link. I've never actually tried Thorium. I do not, never have, and never will condone the use of "warez".

I advise you to remove the main website link for Thorium. A moderator "pointed me" with a "permanent" point for posting that link in the past.