NotHereToPlayGames

Agreed. I'm just keeping my full list of polyfills enabled since I'm seeing no more page breaks.

The 2ality post specifically states "this blog post only demonstrates the new methods with Arrays, but they are also available for Typed Arrays". Typed Arrays are - Int8Array Uint8Array Uint8ClampedArray Int16Array Uint16Array Int32Array Uint32Array Float32Array Float64Array BigInt64Array BigUint64Array This (same link as earlier post) polyfill should work for Arrays and Typed Arrays.

I'm opting for this polyfill but do have the four "smaller" ones included-but-disabled in my Tampermonkey set of userscripts. Won't really know the best option until we can find an example web site or two.

Awesome, thanks! I did miss the edit and also somehow missed the findLast. I can now keep all enabled without any page breaks.

In both cases, it was only this polyfill that broke the page -- if (!Array.prototype.findLastIndex) { Array.prototype.findLastIndex = function (callback, thisArg) { for (let i = this.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (callback.call(thisArg, this, i, this)) return i; } return -1; }; }

I'm finding that having "too many" polyfill injections cause more problems then they solve (breaks Sedecordle, breaks MS Teams, just the first two I've found). For now, I just keep my list of polyfills disabled by default then enable them when needed as opposed to just injecting them all "just in case" they might be needed. Technically, I've yet to encounter these on any web site I ever visit.

sortoflikeaneecummingspoem

W o r k s f o r m e . . .

Agreed, same here. I never used v11 long enough to encounter crashes with v11. Nor did I use it long enough to stumble upon the rebase and I've only ever used v11 without rebase. My v13 crashes seem to always be extension-related (even with only ONE extension). When I downgraded the extension to an OLDER version, stability returned to v13. I have not had any of these crashes with v13.5.

Proxomitron or Proximodo or Proxydomo.

DHCP Lease ?

I use Tampermonkey.

You really need to stop doing this! This type of impatience is very likely grounds for getting yourself banned from MSFN. Roytam only releases his browsers once per week and you have five requests in three days all for the same issue!

Not in my view. Not all of us "see" things the same way and every one of our worlds is centered around what we ourselves "see". Why "micromanage" and create a visual concentric to one paradigm? Removing posts for the sake of disagreement is "micromanaging" what others "see" and attempts to paint one paradigm. I'll leave that to legacyfan (OP) and the mods. But yes, "this has been fun", lol.

That is ONE way to look at it. One person can be a "glass half full" person. Another can be a "glass half empty" person. And NEITHER ONE of them is "correct", nor NEITHER ONE of them is "incorrect". Truth is not "absolute". "It's all relative." Having to choose between two choices does not make the selection 50-50. The world is not "black and white".

It's also human nature to kind of think that the world revolves around "you". We are all the CENTER of our own world, our frame of reference is always through our own eyes and ears, not somebody else's eyes and ears. Somebody can wave to somebody BEHIND you, and it is kind of human nature to want to wave back, but some of us can divert that reaction to looking to the side so that our peripheral sees behind us. That's actually one of my funniest observations in life, I drive with one hand at the steering wheel "at noon" (my vehicles are manual transmission, dislike automatic transmission). It is HILLARIOUS the number of people that WAVE to me because they see one hand at the top of the steering wheel and they are so self-centric that they think I was WAVING at them.

Yep! I've seen DOZENS (plural!) of conversations here at MSFN taken out of context and steered in the wrong direction. DOZENS! By dozens of different people, no real "common denominator" (some have a common denominator, but not "statistically significant"). Most of the time "by accident". A few times "on purpose". I try to just "write them off" as cultural differences and language barriers. This is a multinational web site. Points can not often be conveyed ACCURATELY in a tiny sentence or two. And nobody wants to read a "diatribe" when visiting MSFN. We all view the world differently and that view can effect just how a tiny sentence is interpreted. ALL forums are like that.

It doesn't matter to me either. I'm just citing that this is bad marketing. HOW did you ever FIND this firewall? You didn't find it from a search engine with a search query like "windows xp firewall", did you? That's how I find most of my can't-live-without software programs. But agreed, it doesn't matter. Their market will probably TRIPLE now that users can find out about it here at MSFN versus a search engine query.

Not very good marketing strategy, if you ask me. Why would a software developer name a program intended for use on XP and start the name off with "Windows 10" ??? ??? ???

Sweet! Thanks again.

Awesome! Thanks.

I suppose that is one way to look at it. I propose some others (I am not "moderating", I am "discussing", there is a difference) - 1) in hopes they would fix it == you assume the author of NTLite is an MSFN Member that recommends MSFN for his/her source of feedback, ie, you assume your comments, positive or negative, would be seen by the author here at MSFN a) does NTLite's own GUI have a feedback link and where does it take you, I have to assume that it does not take you to MSFN b) "when you assume, you make an arse out of u and me" 2) locked the feedback topic == if the author did not authorize MSFN as the source of feedback, then shouldn't NTLite posts be directed toward the USERS of NTLite and not the AUTHOR of NTLite? 3) if MSFN allowed excessive "negatives" towards any piece of software, can the author of the software sue MSFN for slander against his/her software? if so, shouldn't MSFN protect themselves by not allowing the "negatives"? 4) let's assume that the author did stumble upon the "negatives", does not that author have the legal right to request them be removed or at the very least request his/her own feedback channel be used instead? a) I personally think that creators should not create if they cannot take both positive and negative criticism 5) does this pertain? -- "if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all"

I've seen both of them. When I watch movies, I've generally forgotten the entire plot within a week. The 1986 World Series, on the other hand, Game 6, bottom of the 10th, two outs, down by two, I can play the at-bats in my head of Carter, Mitchell, Knight, and Wilson like it was YESTERDAY. Especially Mookie Wilson jumping up and down on the wild sixth pitch and Mitchell tying the score. Then on the 10th pitch, the Mets tied the World Series at three games a piece with a 6 to 5 come-from-behind victory that still ranks amongst the most famous games in baseball history.