Jump to content

ED_Sln

Member
  • Posts

    513
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Russian Federation

Everything posted by ED_Sln

  1. Yes, with the files from pm26xp-no-manifest, palemoon-26.5.0-20240601.win2000 started.
  2. @roytam1 In Windows XP SP1 on a Pentium III E, the system crashes into a blue screen with error code Stop: c000021a when running palemoon-26.5.0-*********.win2000, except palemoon-26.5.0-20180718.win2000.old, it starts. What could be the problem? Does the browser require SSE2 instructions?
  3. ED_Sln

    D3D12On7

    But Nvidia's help claims that DX12 is supported even in Kepler and Fermi: https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/3711/~/which-nvidia-gpus-will-support-dx12%3F But all this is of course marketing, there is no DX12 there. I'm not a gamer, so I didn't check out the games. I know for sure World Of Warcraft and Cyberpunk 2077 before some update support DX12 in Win 7. But I compiled the D3D12On7 test and it works for me.
  4. ED_Sln

    D3D12On7

    Just like DX11 had versions 11, 11.1 and 11.2, DX12 has different versions. 12(11_0) = DX11.1 - Nvidia 7*0, not a real DX12. 12(11_1) = DX11.2 - Radeon HD7**0, 12(12_0) = DX 11.2 - Nvidia 9*0, this version was called real DX12 after its release, it seems to be the same version in GTX10*0, GTX16*0, RTX20*0. And the newest DX12(12_2), RTX30*0, RTX40*0 and RX7*00. All data taken from GPU-Z.
  5. ED_Sln

    D3D12On7

    Yes, GTX1060. But you can call it at least 13, or you can raise the version every month like browsers do, it doesn't mean that it really has such changes that it's a new version. It's just further development. In the history of DX, has there ever been a time when video cards supporting an older version suddenly started hardware support for the new one? I don't remember. And even video cards supporting DX9.0 could not support what was added in DX9.0c.
  6. ED_Sln

    D3D12On7

    The fact that video cards that do not support DX12, but support 11.1 began to support DX12 after its release, indirectly confirms that there is no 12, it is all an update of 11, for so many years there is a lot of things added, so now it can be conditionally called 11.5. So also the version of NT10 is not true, it is the same NT6 core, and now actually core 6.4. Although in the registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion even in Win11 the version is listed as 6.3, as in 8.1.
  7. I don't have this error, I checked on three OS, one of which is XP x64. Did you take the files from chrome-xpapi-adapter_x86.b5064-wD3D9accel.zip and additionally the file from chrome-xpapi-adapter.5065.for.testing.zip?
  8. The files have been renamed, everything is correct now.
  9. Here it is, at the very top 124 version, but pre-release: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases Except that instead of the x32 version there are debug files.
  10. ffmpeg 7.0.1 full requires Windows 10.
  11. Yes, I tested with chrome-xpapi-adapter.5062.2.for.testing. But again, I was testing in a virtual machine. I can also test on a physical computer with i7 3770 with 8 threads. Upd: Tested it on an i7 3770. The result is the same for the original progwrp.dll and chrome-xpapi-adapter.5062.2.for.testing. On tests: Aquarium 500 fish, 5 fps, CPU load on average 70%. AV1 1080@3000 - 17% CPU load on average.
  12. WebGL test with the original progwrp.dll showed exactly the same results, both in CPU load with different number of cores and in fps, as well as on 6 was 4 fps, and on 12-16 - 3 fps. The av1 video test also has the same CPU load with both dlls.
  13. I checked it in a virtual machine with 6, 12 and 16 cores. With the increase of cores the load only decreases. But the fps even slightly decreased, on 6 cores it is stable 4, and with more cores - 3.
  14. I checked each file separately, but apart from setup and uninstall it found only two files. It turns out that inside the archive finds a lot, but without the archive - no, how is this possible?
  15. I'm checking individual files, not the whole folder, and it seems to be clean there, I checked almost all files, but only chrome_pwa_launcher.exe has one trigger. Strangely, the number of antiviruses finding something is much lower in the 64 bit version.
  16. Checked individual files, yes progwrp.dll is clean, all triggers come from setup.exe. But again, none of the famous antivirus does not find anything there, so I'm inclined to false positives. Perhaps all these antiviruses use the same detection method.
  17. I think it's progwrp.dll, it overrides system calls, so it can be detected as suspicious. The same happens with VxKex for Win 7, it also has call interception and some antiviruses detect it as a malware. Kaspersky antivirus also detected progwrp.dll as a trojan at first, but after updating the antivirus databases it stopped detecting it, apparently they figured out that it was a false positive. And on Virustotal, only some unknown antiviruses find trojans, only 2-3 I've heard of at all.
  18. You have the second revision, there is a driver for it for Win10 only. Therefore, if you want to continue using Win7, you will have to install an additional network card.
  19. Welcome to MSFN. Write the ID of the device. There are two revisions of the I219, one has a driver, the other does not. As a last resort, you can use a PCI-E Network Card, or USB-LAN if there are no ports available.
  20. Because versions for XP, Vista, 7 and 8/8.1 Now separately: https://github.com/Alex313031/thorium-legacy/releases/tag/M122.0.6261.168 And so far the latest version for all of them is 122.
  21. Right this way: https://msfn.org/board/topic/182599-nt-5x-windows-update-urls-dump-inc-custom-support-updates/ In the archive you need the file NT_5.2.3790-x64-Custom.txt in it there are links to updates released for the period July 2015 - August 2019. The links seem to be working for now. Almost all updates can be installed on XP x64. There are also updates for .Net in the NT_5-x64-NetFx.txt file.
  22. Try selecting "Enable VGA mode" from the F8 menu. Maybe some program changed the screen settings and they became incompatible with the base driver.
  23. https://github.com/Alex313031/thorium-legacy/releases I did not make a screenshot of the whole page, there is a whole mountain of text.
  24. @Dave-H Thorium has the setting you need, in chrome://flags #close-window-with-last-tab toggle to "Never" and the browser will no longer shut down when you close the last tab.
  25. You have the wrong version downloaded, for XP you need to download Thorium_122.0.6261.168_WINXP_x32.zip. In the unpacked folder run thorium.exe or run one of cmd for installation or portable mode.
×
×
  • Create New...