
AstroSkipper
MemberContent Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by AstroSkipper
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Hello @George King! Thanks for your request and tips! At the moment, support for multiple languages is not envisaged. I will look into this in due course, but English is an international language and, in my opinion, quite sufficient. But anyway, thanks for that! Cheers, AstroSkipper- 922 replies
-
2
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
I have decided to expand the documentation of ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 with a short explanation of the sixteen menu items based on the experiences from the beta test. Apparently, not all menu items are self-explanatory after all! Thanks for that especially to @mina7601!- 922 replies
-
5
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
@mina7601 Thanks for your offer! You are a great beta tester! Glad to hear I can count on you in future times! And, of course, I will!- 922 replies
-
3
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Try to use @cmalex's PROXYMII or in the next days, my up-coming release of ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 for more convenient use! It provides all TLS protocols from 1.0 to brand new 1.3 with all important ciphers. It supports old SSL 3.0, too. It can be used with any browser. Furthemore, try a new clean profile, and disable temporarily all web filtering features of your security software!
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Beta testing of ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 Hello again, my dear beta testers, @Dave-H, @mina7601, @NotHereToPlayGames, @George King, @XPerceniol! This was a beta test at its best! One week of testing, fixing code, and checking different scenarios! With very many helpful and exploitable results! You all did a very good job. But one after the other! First of all, thanks to @XPerceniol for the attempt to test my program package! Unfortunately, his computer did not want to participate in the testing. It's a pity that this could not be followed up! Next, I would also like to thank @George King for the willingness to test my package in Windows XP Professional x64, which unfortunately could not be done due to personal reasons! Furthermore, a big thank you to @NotHereToPlayGames for testing, reporting and confirming that my package runs on Windows XP Professional x64, despite private commitments! And on it goes! A big thank you to @Dave-H for the continuous testing and reporting, for your advices and support, especially for the correction of my documentation in terms of spelling, punctuation and grammar! I did my best, but unfortunately, I no longer have reading glasses, I need new ones , and I am not a native English speaker. And finally, a very special, huge thank you to @mina7601 for the in-depth testing, tracking down and confirming bugs, for the continuous reporting and your support! This is how a beta test provides solid and usable data. Simply great! Anyway, I have to thank you all for your efforts and time commitment! This is not something that can be taken for granted! This beta test was absolutely important and also necessary. Five times I had to send additionally corrected versions of different programs to you via PM. An early release of my program package would have been a disaster for sure! But now, all the problems we found have been fixed, and hopefully there are none left, although programs always contain bugs of some kind. Speaking of bugs, from now on we have a new terminus technicus, the one I christened "space bug". And, I love it sooo much! Anyway, you guys are a great team , and with this post I officially end this beta test. I hope I can count on you next time. Everything else soon! Greetings from Germany! Cheers, AstroSkipper- 922 replies
-
4
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Thank you very much for your offer! You can use the proxy and all its features as usual. Maybe, try some you usually don't use or need! In any case, the daily use is a second test, too. This beta test will be ending very soon by a special post of me. But it won't be the last one. The development of ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu will go on. I hope I can count on you next time, too.- 922 replies
-
2
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Yep! The strings of PopMenu's settings window can't be changed unless you'd decompile PopMenu.exe, replace the strings, and recompile it again. The problem is the decompiling, a kind of reverse engineering. In most cases you won't get the complete code. I forgot to mention that in some cases you can replace code or images by Resource Hacker. I used it to replace the icon in @cmalex's ProxHTTPSProxy,exe to get back the old, well-known icon of whenever's or @heinoganda's releases. Resource Hacker can recompile such a modified executable. But this won't work with all files. You have to have luck, too.- 922 replies
-
1
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Yep! The strings of PopMenu's settings window can't be changed unless you'd decompile PopMenu.exe, replace the strings, and recompile it again. The problem is the decompiling, a kind of reverse engineering. In most cases you won't get the complete code.- 922 replies
-
1
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Can you let me know which Firemin version you have with XP 32bit?I e-mailed Rizonesoft,but don't know if they will respond. Thanks. Hello @ADMM! The latest and presumably last XP-compatible release of Firemin Portable, which I am using in my Windows Professional XP 32bit SP3 (fully POSReady updated), is of version number 6.3.1.5105. Let me know if you can't find it anymore! In this case, I could upload it for you. Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Very funny! You have simply to replace them by the desired language in the Settings of PopMenu. No chance of more than one language, unfortunately! Unless, you provide several versions of the file PopMenu.ini in different languages. But, only one of them can be loaded at a time. The strings inside PopMenu.exe can't be replaced easily. The program is a compiled executable. My recommendation is to leave it all in the language English only as it already is. So that it remains consistent, of course! Cheers, AstroSkipper- 922 replies
-
1
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Thanks for your confirmation! My last remaining beta tester concurs with the findings of the others. Very good! As I already said to @mina7601, the programming of ActivateProxy.exe was a bit more complicated. Anyway, glad it works for you, too!- 922 replies
-
1
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Very funny! You have simply to replace them by the desired language in the Settings of PopMenu. No chance of more than one language, unfortunately! Unless, you provide several versions of the file PopMenu.ini in different languages. But, only one of them can be loaded at a time.- 922 replies
-
1
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
I really need reading glasses. I didn't read it correctly. Sorry! To clarify your assumption, @heinoganda's version doesn't need the manual setting of PATH variables and didn't have any setup. My package has a configuration utility which doesn't add PATH variables, either.- 922 replies
-
1
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Thanks a lot for your confirmation and compliments! Glad it works for you, too!- 922 replies
-
1
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Thanks for the confirmation! Frankly, the programming work of it was a bit tricky. Glad it works for you, too!- 922 replies
-
2
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
The new ActivateProxy.exe works, too?- 922 replies
-
1
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Yes, of course! Test whatever you want to test! Or simply, check all! And, BTW, you are doing a great job here! (Sorry, no smiley here with the sign "GREAT JOB"!)- 922 replies
-
1
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Hello again, my dear beta testers, @Dave-H, @mina7601, @NotHereToPlayGames! I modified the file ActivateProxy.exe to work as it should. If an user decides to edit the config.ini and change the FrontPort setting for some reasons, then my program ActivateProxy.exe will now activate the port value which has really been set in the configuration file config.ini. Please, replace the old file by the new one and test it! Edit the value of the parameter FrontPort, e.g., FrontPort = 8089, in the file config.ini.and execute my program ActivateProxy.exe or StartProxy.exe! Check if the new value has been set correctly by executing OpenLANSet.exe! You can do all that via the popmenu. Don't forget to set the FrontPort back to the old, well-known value of 8079 in the file config.ini after testing! I'll send you the download link of the modified version via PM as usual in the next minutes. In any case, the settings in the configuration file config.ini of ProxHTTPSProxy will be respected and applied again. Cheers, AstroSkipper- 922 replies
-
1
-
- TLS protocols
- HTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with: