roytam1

@blackwingcat I tried my best to port latest extended kernel and extended core to my language (CHT) by Replacing Japanese Resources to CHT Resources and it seems working correctly(except I don't have vista\*loc.dll so I leave them unchanged), and I wonder if I can post download link here.

http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/175160-installing-sp4/?p=1118126 Cheers and Regards Read that already, but what is actually changed in files in particular(for example xxx.sys replaced with hotfix-kbXXXXXXX)?

I wonder what is changed between POSReady updates and unofficial SP4 update.

This kernel version is old. (Dated 2016-01-16 3:51, version 5.1.2600.6748 in Windowsxp_remove_4gb_Ram_limit_addon.7z) There is 5.1.2600.7005 in my system now. It will be nice if you can show what you modified in ntos*.exe and/or hal dlls so people can address them when newer kernel comes.

does it have a faster javascript engine? actually the biggest issue of fx2/sm1 is slow javascript execution. And also NSS needs to be updated for TLS support.

forget about it, POSReady2009 *IS* XP. just patch around palemoon.exe and run as usual.

As usual you can just hack around palemoon.exe for running.

Alpha2 & RinGOch. I don't know how common it is but at least I use it.

> You should remove .NET Framework 1.0 and 1.1 if installed, as both no longer receive updates. But if you have programs that compiled for .net 1.0 or 1.1, you should not remove them since .net 2.0 or later runtimes are unable to run .net 1.0/1.1 programs.

You can still use ESET Antivirus Business Edition 4.2(Even works in NT4)

Here still has a NT4 server serving files

I think I am using: "Ralink RT3290 802.11bgn WiFi Adapter".If someone can Bypass the OS Check on this driver for Windows XP, will be amazing! By the way, I wanted to say thank you for entering that deep in my problem! You are one good person! Did you try an older version of driver?http://drivers.softpedia.com/get/NETWORK-CARD/Ralink/ECS-H61H-G11-V20-Ralink-RT3290-WLAN-Driver-3270.shtml This driver needs XP. :/ try *NOT* using installer, but just pointing to XP INF location in driver installation dialog.

I think I am using: "Ralink RT3290 802.11bgn WiFi Adapter". If someone can Bypass the OS Check on this driver for Windows XP, will be amazing! By the way, I wanted to say thank you for entering that deep in my problem! You are one good person! Did you try an older version of driver? http://drivers.softpedia.com/get/NETWORK-CARD/Ralink/ECS-H61H-G11-V20-Ralink-RT3290-WLAN-Driver-3270.shtml

actually it is not about "Bypass the OS Check" but different NDIS version. Device vendors use new Windows DDK, which has newer NDIS and that means newer API that is not available in older Windows(e.g. XP/2003)

Any chance making new Chinese(Traditional) version of Extended Kernel and Extended Core?

and also PPAPI link: http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/latest/help/install_flash_player_ppapi.exe

blackwingcat did that. search ".net 1.1" in wlu will give you a list of .net 1.1 fixes, installable on both 2000 and XP.

KB3046306 update in April Patch Tuesday seems to be buggy. I had 2 times of system freeze after installing it.

I wonder if KDW has update for win2000 PC that is not able to apply UURollUp and extended kernel?

see this for solution: http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/173049-windowsmicrosoft-update-not-working-on-windows-2000xp2003/#entry1089383

Does win2000 support Paragon GPT Loader?

http://bearwindows.boot-land.net/scsifix.7z

harkaz, i appreciate the work that you have done.. i installed your "FIX" for the MS15-010/3013455 update, which, incidentally, took a leap of faith, since it is a modified "windows" file and it also requires installing a "certificate" for it.. with all of the talk about komodia's installing certificates etc, and with "privdog", and everything else associated with that, when you talk about installing a certificate (not to mention installing a modified windows file), it is concerning: http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/02/lenovo-pcs-ship-with-man-in-the-middle-adware-that-breaks-https-connections/ http://www.pcworld.com/article/2887632/secure-advertising-tool-privdog-compromises-https-security.html i would like to know how to remove your certificate that i installed, in case i ever want to.. does it have a name? to remove the certificate, would you simply delete the "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\Root\Certificates\F2C90A445A5E0F0F79AEDEB694D50B9656B24A71" regkey, or would deleting that regkey cause problems with other certificates? i just wanted to mention something.. looking at the screenshot that you posted, you say that "the order of command execution is reversed", but there seems to be more to it.. in your screenshot, in the code in the window on the left, it has a "@sc1_InitializeTwilightcontours@12" while the code in the window on the right doesn't, at least that is the way that it looks to me.. maybe you already noticed that, or maybe i am confused and that actually was the point that you were making.. regarding the MS15-010/3013455 update, from what you have posted, it seems that the "win32k.sys" file that was installed by the 3013455 update was flawed, and that the 3037639 update, which was meant to fix the font problem, simply tweaks windows in order to allow it to use the flawed win32k.sys file, but without the font-problems.. tweaking windows to where it can use a flawed win32k.sys file (but without the font problems) doesn't sound good to me.. from reading some of the other posts here, it seems that some people opted to tweak the win32k.sys file themselves.. i suppose that they also had to use their own certificates in order for windows to allow the modified win32k.sys file to be installed and to run.. for the record, i don't know anything about "coding" software.. i am not an "expert".. i am just a regular home-computer-user.. nope, I just modified win32.sys and replace them(in both dllcache and system32) on-the-fly right after installing original KB3013455 patch. So no cert. are needed.

I do not believe there's a similar project for Windows NT 4.0 sadly. That's one reason why I've sort of given up using it, even though I like NT 4. The only thing I know of that exists for NT4 is a transformation pack that makes NT4 look a bit like Windows Vista and the link can be found in this forum, but that just changes the looks, it won't change the functions. BWC's FCW doesn't even run on NT4 and just crashes with an error message. So someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I don't believe I am.There is a group of people playing around the leaked sources to reconstruct an usable build. http://opennt.net/?id=Home

Thanks for report. Did I misunderstood the instruction?Patch harkaz code as fixed code for all languages? Patch 55D1F : E8 F7 04 00 00 Patch 55D2A : E8 17 7E FF FF seems so.