roytam1

> You should remove .NET Framework 1.0 and 1.1 if installed, as both no longer receive updates. But if you have programs that compiled for .net 1.0 or 1.1, you should not remove them since .net 2.0 or later runtimes are unable to run .net 1.0/1.1 programs.

You can still use ESET Antivirus Business Edition 4.2(Even works in NT4)

Here still has a NT4 server serving files

I think I am using: "Ralink RT3290 802.11bgn WiFi Adapter".If someone can Bypass the OS Check on this driver for Windows XP, will be amazing! By the way, I wanted to say thank you for entering that deep in my problem! You are one good person! Did you try an older version of driver?http://drivers.softpedia.com/get/NETWORK-CARD/Ralink/ECS-H61H-G11-V20-Ralink-RT3290-WLAN-Driver-3270.shtml This driver needs XP. :/ try *NOT* using installer, but just pointing to XP INF location in driver installation dialog.

I think I am using: "Ralink RT3290 802.11bgn WiFi Adapter". If someone can Bypass the OS Check on this driver for Windows XP, will be amazing! By the way, I wanted to say thank you for entering that deep in my problem! You are one good person! Did you try an older version of driver? http://drivers.softpedia.com/get/NETWORK-CARD/Ralink/ECS-H61H-G11-V20-Ralink-RT3290-WLAN-Driver-3270.shtml

actually it is not about "Bypass the OS Check" but different NDIS version. Device vendors use new Windows DDK, which has newer NDIS and that means newer API that is not available in older Windows(e.g. XP/2003)

Any chance making new Chinese(Traditional) version of Extended Kernel and Extended Core?

and also PPAPI link: http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/latest/help/install_flash_player_ppapi.exe

blackwingcat did that. search ".net 1.1" in wlu will give you a list of .net 1.1 fixes, installable on both 2000 and XP.

KB3046306 update in April Patch Tuesday seems to be buggy. I had 2 times of system freeze after installing it.

I wonder if KDW has update for win2000 PC that is not able to apply UURollUp and extended kernel?

see this for solution: http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/173049-windowsmicrosoft-update-not-working-on-windows-2000xp2003/#entry1089383

Does win2000 support Paragon GPT Loader?

http://bearwindows.boot-land.net/scsifix.7z

harkaz, i appreciate the work that you have done.. i installed your "FIX" for the MS15-010/3013455 update, which, incidentally, took a leap of faith, since it is a modified "windows" file and it also requires installing a "certificate" for it.. with all of the talk about komodia's installing certificates etc, and with "privdog", and everything else associated with that, when you talk about installing a certificate (not to mention installing a modified windows file), it is concerning: http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/02/lenovo-pcs-ship-with-man-in-the-middle-adware-that-breaks-https-connections/ http://www.pcworld.com/article/2887632/secure-advertising-tool-privdog-compromises-https-security.html i would like to know how to remove your certificate that i installed, in case i ever want to.. does it have a name? to remove the certificate, would you simply delete the "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\Root\Certificates\F2C90A445A5E0F0F79AEDEB694D50B9656B24A71" regkey, or would deleting that regkey cause problems with other certificates? i just wanted to mention something.. looking at the screenshot that you posted, you say that "the order of command execution is reversed", but there seems to be more to it.. in your screenshot, in the code in the window on the left, it has a "@sc1_InitializeTwilightcontours@12" while the code in the window on the right doesn't, at least that is the way that it looks to me.. maybe you already noticed that, or maybe i am confused and that actually was the point that you were making.. regarding the MS15-010/3013455 update, from what you have posted, it seems that the "win32k.sys" file that was installed by the 3013455 update was flawed, and that the 3037639 update, which was meant to fix the font problem, simply tweaks windows in order to allow it to use the flawed win32k.sys file, but without the font-problems.. tweaking windows to where it can use a flawed win32k.sys file (but without the font problems) doesn't sound good to me.. from reading some of the other posts here, it seems that some people opted to tweak the win32k.sys file themselves.. i suppose that they also had to use their own certificates in order for windows to allow the modified win32k.sys file to be installed and to run.. for the record, i don't know anything about "coding" software.. i am not an "expert".. i am just a regular home-computer-user.. nope, I just modified win32.sys and replace them(in both dllcache and system32) on-the-fly right after installing original KB3013455 patch. So no cert. are needed.

I do not believe there's a similar project for Windows NT 4.0 sadly. That's one reason why I've sort of given up using it, even though I like NT 4. The only thing I know of that exists for NT4 is a transformation pack that makes NT4 look a bit like Windows Vista and the link can be found in this forum, but that just changes the looks, it won't change the functions. BWC's FCW doesn't even run on NT4 and just crashes with an error message. So someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I don't believe I am.There is a group of people playing around the leaked sources to reconstruct an usable build. http://opennt.net/?id=Home

Thanks for report. Did I misunderstood the instruction?Patch harkaz code as fixed code for all languages? Patch 55D1F : E8 F7 04 00 00 Patch 55D2A : E8 17 7E FF FF seems so.

Adjust PE checksum http://www.coderforlife.com/projects/utilities/#PEChecksum A XP at a virtual machine does boot still. Edited: Ignore this. Try you patch. A different approach, the same patch: search for 8b cb 8b d7 e8 expect address about 55D1F find e.g. E8 22 7E FF FF at 55D1F search for 8b d7 8b cb e8 expect address about 55D2A find e.g. E8 EC 04 00 00 at 55D2A Patch 55D1F : E8 EC 04 00 00 Patch 55D2A : E8 22 7E FF FF Yeah, that was exactly the result I got by doing it my way, but I didn't adjust PE checksum - after using the tool you suggested, I didn't get a BSOD anymore when booting, but the font corruption wasn't cured. So, as Dave-H said that he had to re-do the ClearType tuning, I tried this, too, by installing Microsofts Cleartype Tuner Powertoy. But then I got BSOD after BSOD, so in the end, I had to recover my imaged file :-( Has anyone an idea what did go wrong? not only copying bytes but also need offset value adjustment as http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/171814-posready-2009-updates-ported-to-windows-xp-sp3-enu/page-13#entry1095037posted.

I can't find such difference in my 6712 CHT when comparing with 6648 CHT. EDIT: oh you mean WindowsServer2003-KB3013455-x86-ENU vs WindowsServer2003-KB3037639-x86-ENU in post http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/171814-posready-2009-updates-ported-to-windows-xp-sp3-enu/page-13#entry1095037does work. thanks!

Thanks for your information. Too late for me to read this and I wasted whole day battling with it, I even opened a question in superuser. http://superuser.com/questions/876542/ugly-font-in-xp-how-can-i-restore-it/876668#876668 http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-windows_update/kb3013455-breaks-font-smoothing/0400147f-fe2e-4d53-8b35-1a7a06962087?tm=1423669336226

Embedded KB2686509 has kblCheckerE.dll but not kblChecker.dll and it checks for HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\ProductOptions\ProductSuite == "EmbeddedNT" as Prerequisite

IIRC POSReady has no .net 1.1 runtime installed

BTW blackwingcat had made .net 1.1 patch available to 2000/XP as well.

found another issue: patched kernel (with any hal) makes EAC can't read Virtual Drive created with Daemon Tools.

BTW I wrote another starter to auto-select most idle core for the program that requires single-core. https://mega.co.nz/#!GYlGjDCZ!VQGTLKL2Cjr6XCxI4jb2786KaynIMbJh3Sd-sDftTsM As it reads HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA for measuring CPU usage per core, it takes 1 second before starting program. And it keeps running for 2 seconds after starting program for setting active core again because some programs try to set itself to use Core 0 upon start.