Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/28/2025 in all areas
-
New build of Serpent/UXP for XP! Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20250628-3219d2d-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20250628-3219d2d-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20250628-3219d2d-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod-ia32.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32 NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20250628-d849524bd-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod.7z Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20250628-d849524bd-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod-ia32.7z Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20250628-d849524bd-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod-sse.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20250628-d849524bd-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod.7z Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20250628-d849524bd-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-w7plus-avx2.7z Official UXP changes picked since my last build: - No issue - Escape `<` and `>` in element attribute values. (3c2c7ce1e2) - Issue #2488 - Follow-up: Ensure container is initialized for cloned declaration blocks (c91730dc7b) - Issue #2762 - Remove SVGZoomEvent interface. (1c8e994b65) - [DOM] Update YouTube embed rewrites. (0c2770ff7b) - [Layout] Hold stronger references to FontFaces. (5e12078904) - [XPCOM] Add Mac-specific executable extensions (80b542efc3) - Issue #2765 - Part 1: Scrollbar width should be treated as a non-inherited property (8236eec152) - Issue #2765 - Part 2: Create a helper function for resolving the non-NAC style context of a given NAC (b2c435a189) - Issue #2765 - Part 3: Make scrollbar width checks use the originating non-NAC style context (3ba0b10bb4) - No issue - Refactor nsStyleUIReset::CalcDifference to accumulate change hints (2c704d1b8e) - Issue #2764 - Fix several properties to return NeutralChange hint (d14972602f) No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build. No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build. My changes picked since my last build: - nss: update certdata and bump ckbi version to 2.78 (cd1840493f) - nss: merge changes from upstream UXP (bde8fbbb5f) Update Notice: - You may delete file named icudt*.dat inside program folder when updating from old releases. * Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.3 points
-
I get a warning from the Malwarebytes Browser Guard extension on that site, but it works fine if I override it. Supermium 132.0.6834.224 on XP.2 points
-
Introducing StartAllBack: an app to fix all Windows 11 UI issues! Restore taskbar functionality - Drag and drop, different icon sizes, different screen sides, widgets, new icons, old flyouts, oh my! Restore context menus - Win32 menus were never this sexy! Fix Windows Explorer - Ribbon UI and Command Bar made sexy and not slow; search box that works Top notch styling - Recolor everything: all UI elements in all apps don't have to be blue! - Fix broken Win32 styling in Win11 RTM version - Improved dark mode styling with Explorer And start menu: yes! - Windows 7 style all-signing, all-dancing yet again, refreshed with new look and functions It could be the last year you can enjoy Windows not crippled, so do it! https://www.startallback.com1 point
-
It's Cloudflare, Jim, but not as we know it. Anubis is another clunky piece of software developed by people who believe that only selected browsers are allowed to use the internet. It seems to be predicated on the idea that any non-conformant browser must be evil. Ironically, https://forums.mozillazine.org/ are using the exact same thing. Ben.1 point
-
i forgot the about RAMDISC that AWE was already used in the past with RAMDISC´s (and used more then 4 GB of ram in xp in the past like this) but it has the problem i described before, it can fill more then 4 GB of ram (or the upper parts past of 4 GB physical ram addresses) but then you have to "remap" that pages into a virtual offset - that goes fast but its a small step to do (you have to make it in pieces then) for an app/executable that might be different, because multiple apps/executables mean more virtual offsets for each app/executable therefore the app´s/executables then would be able to use 4 GB of ram in every executable (every app can be seen as a extra virtual offset) - in this case windows then just maps the higher physical ram (for example physical ram addresses from 5-8 GB) - that is possible thats because useally you only see the "virtual offset" - it is not a physical address so then you would have 4 GB each app/executable to mention a other problem, chrome or an application are not always "flawed" either, they actually have bugs for example i have a win7 machine where a memory crash always apear after some time bigger app´s dont useally have a own controlment for its memory, they use a engine - in this case probaly a memory managment engine that win7 chrome is bugged with a "untouched download" from chrome for me so it not neccesary has to be always a error of the backport for example to windowsXP well about that patch - i havnt worked on it so its hard for me to say if it is really doing its job what i can see but is that this patch dont show its connection for the PTE´s and PDE´s - that would be a neccesary thing it must can handle (the patch is incredible small) let´s say it cant, then it might print out "i have 16 GB of ram", but the progress might not be done maybe the patch just works - that would be possible the patch should be tested, or maybe someone comments if he already has tested that patch, maybe someone has knowledge what dave wrote sounds a bit like that it actually dont work chrome make multiple apps/executables - and if its doing that it has at least 2 GB of ram for each app 2 GB should be enough for one TAB by like a far if that out of memory error apears when a lot off app/executables apears it would be an indicator that the patch dont work because it cant handle the PTE´s PDE´s or maybe other parts of that progress (that handle the controlment of physical pages above 4 GB) then it would try to use the first piece of the 4 GB ram and that error would apear so hard to say, but i would try multiple apps/executables that actually use up more then 4 GB ram1 point
-
Many people use a different system than they have in their profile, or have several computers with different systems.... So reboot12 was right to ask the question.1 point
-
The alternative forum is now available. It is located here: https://tripredacus.net/forum/index.php This forum is actively managed by myself and has public status sections for the three websites that I am providing temporary forums for. The fallback boards are not visible to the public and are not segregated, meaning if you can see a board, you can post in it if you want. The sections will always be open, even if the hosted site has an Up status such as MSFN currently does. This forum is not intended to, nor can it replace MSFN. It is also not meant to be a replacement for other unmanaged or unofficial meatup destinations such as any Discord channels, Steam or Facebook groups. It simple is a place to go in case there is a problem or you want to get info about whatever might be happening. This is not an indication that there is any longevity issue with MSFN. The forum rules are not MSFN's rules, with the exception that discussion about circumventing MSFN rules 1 are not allowed. UK/EU members make sure you read the end of the Registration Agreement. Whether you decide to register on it or not is up to you. This post is just to make you aware that it exists. You choose your own level of involvement. If you decide to register, you should edit your profile to put your MSFN name as it explains in the appropriate profile field. Doing so will cause a MSFN icon appear on your info card if you post in a thread.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Same in New Moon. I don't even get this error window; browser just closes... [Edit] Browser also instantly crashes when trying to open the uBlock Origin dashboard. Reverted to previous New Moon (2025-06-17) and no issues.1 point
-
1 point
-
New build of post-deprecated Serpent/moebius for XP! * Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual. ** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions. Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20250628-d30d4d3a0-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20250628-d30d4d3a0-xpmod.7z repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55 Repo changes: - nss: update certdata and bump ckbi version to 2.78 (50af71f27) - nss: merge changes from upstream UXP (4fff1ea8b) - ported from UXP: No issue - Escape `<` and `>` in element attribute values. (3c2c7ce1) (2f49d0788) - import from UXP: Issue #2488 - Follow-up: Ensure container is initialized for cloned declaration blocks (c91730dc) (13795f1b7) - ported from UXP: Issue #2762 - Remove SVGZoomEvent interface. (1c8e994b) (c1bbbdea8) - ported from UXP: [DOM] Update YouTube embed rewrites. (0c2770ff) (a455f5736) - import from UXP: [Layout] Hold stronger references to FontFaces. (5e120789) (7c1aa8b94) - ported from UXP: [XPCOM] Add Mac-specific executable extensions (80b542ef) (8507563c7) - ported from UXP: Issue #2765 - Part 1: Scrollbar width should be treated as a non-inherited property (8236eec1) (58bcb2dcf) - import from UXP: Issue #2765 - Part 2: Create a helper function for resolving the non-NAC style context of a given NAC (b2c435a1) (b26faa19f) - import from UXP: Issue #2765 - Part 3: Make scrollbar width checks use the originating non-NAC style context (3ba0b10b) (ed6d6ffc2) - ported from UXP: No issue - Refactor nsStyleUIReset::CalcDifference to accumulate change hints (2c704d1b) (52ff82c79) - ported from UXP: Issue #2764 - Fix several properties to return NeutralChange hint (d1497260) (d30d4d3a0)1 point
-
New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20250628-7bda12e7-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20250628-7bda12e7-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20250628-id-656ea98-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20250628-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-bde8fbbb5f-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild1 point
-
Wrapper of bcryptprimitives (e.g., p_cryptp from Supermium) and kernel32 (e.g., pwrp_k32 also from Supermium). And you can mod this yourself.1 point
-
Thanks. This is off-topic here of course, but the driver I'm using for the M4000 on XP is version 368.91. Are any of the ones you've referred to later than that?1 point
-
Where did you get this information? It usually comes in two versions, the free version Malware Hunter and the commercial version Malware Hunter Pro. As already described in my article, the features real-time protection and automatic updates are only available in Malware Hunter Pro. Actually, Glarysoft Malware Hunter Pro has a 30-day free trial period. After that, you must purchase a license for the software to use all its professional features. That means you can use it as an on demand scanner when the trial period has expired.1 point
-
Yep! However, I deactivated the file PromoUtil.exe in my installation when I used this security programme. Less pop-ups and less RAM consumption. The problem with all recent 360 Total Security versions is the quality of their scanners since they don't use Avira and Bitdefender scan engines any longer but unfortunately their own ones, 360 Cloud Scan Engine, 360 QVMII AI Engine, QEX and KunPeng. Read this review here: https://www.safetydetectives.com/best-antivirus/360-total-security/ And once again, please provide more information when you do a request! One image and a few words are simply too few.1 point
-
What I can say in any case is that Mypal 68.13.7b is also affected by this issue. And after a short test, Mypal 68.13.3b is affected by these sporadic crashes, too. All in single-process mode. In multiprocess mode, on the other hand, Mypal 68.13.7b doesn't seem to crash on Codeberg.org, i.e. just as in Mypal 68.13.9b. Greetings, AstroSkipper1 point
-
I can't observe this problem in the most recent version of New Moon 28.10.7a1 (32-bit) (2024-02-23) with Palefill 1.28 enabled. This site seems to work. Here is a screenshot: Cheers, AstroSkipper Same applies to the most recent version of Serpent 52 with Palefill 1.28 enabled. No problems here as you can see in this screenshot: Cheers, AstroSkipper1 point
-
@feodor2 Did you observe sudden crashes in Mypal 68.13.9b when surfing on Codeberg.org? Unfortunately, I had to determine sudden crashes without any messages that occur completely randomly when clicking onto links on Codeberg's pages. However, only in single-process mode. All preference settings for single-process mode are set to the default values in my installation. In multiprocess mode, on the other hand, I could not observe such crashes. Any ideas?1 point
-
The third post contains an "Alphabetical list of programs that need to be tested for compatibility, features and support or whose installers have been lost". I think you mean the fourth post which contains the"Alphabetical list of programs that have recently been abandoned or should be avoided". But does 360 Total Security Essential 8.8.0.1119 really not work any longer? I personally assume it is still working but only cloud-based. Am I right? @shelby Is 360 Total Security Essential 8.8.0.1119 still working or not? Have you checked whether the cloud scan engines are still being used by the programme? I need more detailed information to maintain the list. Unfortunately, the information you have provided has been known for a long time and does not clarify the support status of this programme.1 point