Leaderboard

Screenshots? BTW, like I wrote, it's about the overall memory consumption, NOT speed.

It very well may be, it's a security flag that isolates site's processes, but I didn't suggest it.

You're welcome! --process-per-site is very important since it consolidates all numerous processes from a given website into one, hence the memory usage reduction. I posted this flag at MSFN several years ago, I remember VistaLover was confusing it with another flag --site-per-process, they are absolutely different. Seeing the memory leaks are starting to show them off literally on every site now, I indeed think, try it. Out of Memory - Google Maps, then Crash. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/847

optional --disable-low-res-tiling --wm-window-animations-disabled --disable-highres-timer (I like it, but you wrote it's somehow not fitting for XP 32bit).

So what stops you from checking? It will show "n/a", if you don't have one. IPv6 Address n/a https://browserleaks.com/ip

In my system with 1.5 GB RAM, every single megabyte counts. 350 to 450 MB is then a huge amount of RAM.

... People, sadly, continue to do so now with Supermium/Thorium 32-bit on 32-bit XP SP3 (PAE-patched, a configuration the vendor NEVER supported) and have the audacity to create "issues" in the official trackers: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/846 IMHO, this type of users are beyond the point of realising they have a "serious problem" themselves...

Didn't you just contradicted yourself? This flag only has an effect if you are TAB HOARDING !!! No. If you open two or three tabs of the same domain to really work with them, then this has nothing to do with tab hoarding as they are closed immediately when all is done.

@reboot12 Thanks, I completely forgot to install Redistribuable C++ 2015 on this computer. ListDisk is working now !

Personally, I consider opening 15 MSFN tabs and probably many more tabs from other websites to be tab hoarding. IMHO, this kind of surfing behaviour might require professional treatment. BTW, I used to be afflicted with this disease for a while, but fortunately, as an autodidact, I was able to free myself from it. As for the chrome flag --process-per-site, I use it from the beginning and it really saves RAM. I consider this flag useful.

I test both Release XP & Release XP SSE work OK on SSE only CPU with vcredist x86 14:

And now, all in a minimal, quite fresh profile of Mypal 68.14.4b in multiprocess mode, only one empty tab open, 3 extensions installed with 1 enabled, no themes installed, 1 UC.JS script enabled, no CSS stylesheets enabled, xul.dll file rebased and memory minimisation performed. The RAM usage is then round about 120 MB a few minutes after starting the browser: I am generally interested in RAM usage values of other users to see how Mypal 68.14.4b behaves on different computers. And of course, I am particularly interested in comparative values under Windows XP 32-bit on old, weak computers such as mine.

Thanks so much for this info, This is indeed the solution!! Edit: Fun story, I'm banned from ElevenForum. Someone made some pretty nasty remarks about @Tihiy and I reported their post. I was suddenly banned for abusing the reporting system for one post. I guess it's okay there to make remarks about individuals nationality. It's a good resource but terrible moderation.

Hi @Tihiy, Maybe this flew under the radar, so I'd like to check again. Is SAB controlling the display of the list of open windows for an application icon in the taskbar? It seems that the width of the list is now dramatically smaller when there is a big number of windows for a single application. Before the list was wide enough to accommodate the longest window caption (or something like that). Thanks in advance!

This is a Windows 24H2 bug. Workaround: vivetool /enable /id:50557073,52110492 https://www.elevenforum.com/t/kb5041865-windows-11-insider-release-preview-build-26100-1586-24h2-aug-19.27764/post-490811

Probably because you added the switch after the switches' end. (on the screenshot). BTW, the order matters, at first I thought it was a placebo, but no,

As I already wrote here, I'm on vacation, no desktop PC around, besides - you mustn't compare on Windows 10, I wrote that, too. Only those OS that don't have the new memory functioning are relevant,

Thanks, sent the error report to the email. Oh indeed, works on XP x64, apparently they added that system call in it.

I see it like this. If websites can't be loaded properly on my old computer under Windows XP, it's a sign that this website has disqualified itself for my system and now has the pleasure of making the acquaintance of my Android tablet. BTW, websites that take up hundreds of megabytes of RAM are simply rubbish in my world. Especially if they waste my precious RAM to show ads, offer meaningless things and collect user data.

Contrary to my original statement, I have tried to open the Facebook website in Thorium. Even there I am rewarded with a 100% CPU load, and my free RAM memory is being eaten up. The only thing that allows the page to load is using a mobile user agent. Unfortunately, many elements are then not displayed correctly. So, it remains the same. The FB page is just rubbish.

The reason lies around the PrefetchVirtualMemory and VirtualAlloc, since 110-112 the memory management code in Chrome was rewritten. This was the reason they dropped everything below 10, starting V110. PrefetchVirtualMemory (newly introduced function) glitches out on XP. The porters tried to replace it VirtualAlloc. No luck, as we see,

You can't compare browsers running on Win10 to any previous OS. I'll explain why. RAM management is different on Win10, it's the cause for the bug. They weren't able to fix it. The Russian guy (forgot his name, Blunauvich, was it?) he also acknowledged this huge memory leak, he couldn't fix it, then wrote about it to win32, the leak is still not fixed,

For the time being, try third party Instagram browsing sites, maybe? No login needed. https://www.pixwox.com/profile/INSERT_PROFILE_NAME_HERE/ Not sure whom this site belongs to, but works fine,

It should be mentioned at this point that I do not use uBO Legacy 1.16.4.35 at factory defaults. I use a different set of filter lists than the default one. Furthermore, I use additional lists, own rules and scripts. The initial, default setting is only a basic one and is not YouTube related. And I didn't get a video ad on the second video.

But now that various theories have been put forward about YouTube and overlay pop-ups with warnings to the user, I am happy to put forward my theory, which I will not verify or prove in any way. Google, and therefore YouTube, wants to make money. If users use the service over a long period of time without being a premium customer and yet without getting and watching any adverts, then this will certainly be registered by YouTube and therefore by Google in whatever way. These users must then have been using an adblocker the whole time and will eventually receive this overlay pop-up warning.

I'm glad I never used Telegram, the name sounded very awkward for me, even though I'm not a native English speaker.

Yes, I like this extension. It does its job, and the problem with the sporadic disappearance of the Clean Links' toolbar icon doesn't occur anymore.

New build of Serpent/UXP for XP! Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20240824-3219d2d-uxp-2dea274c15-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20240824-3219d2d-uxp-2dea274c15-xpmod.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20240824-3219d2d-uxp-2dea274c15-xpmod-ia32.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32 NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240824-d849524bd-uxp-2dea274c15-xpmod.7z Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240824-d849524bd-uxp-2dea274c15-xpmod-ia32.7z Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240824-d849524bd-uxp-2dea274c15-xpmod-sse.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20240824-d849524bd-uxp-2dea274c15-xpmod.7z Official UXP changes picked since my last build: - Issue #1810 - Implement {get|set}Transform with DOMMatrix arguments. (71bd54891a) - Issue #1810 - Allow superfluous [LenientFloat] extended attributes. (18f039543a) - Issue #1810 - Add DOMMatrix {get|set}Transform WebIDL interfaces (9d6ffb5814) No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build. No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build. Update Notice: - You may delete file named icudt*.dat inside program folder when updating from old releases. * Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.

The good is that the user of New Moon and Serpent has still the choice, at least until now. All prefetching features can be manually disabled to ensure that uBlock Origin Legacy works properly, especially if the user notices interference. So, everyone can decide for themselves what is important to them.

Of course! There's a lot @Sampei.Nihira doesn't tell us here, or tells wrong. Now. we can only wonder why, does he simply entertain himself on MSFN? "Obviously MV3 has reduced performance." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/797#issuecomment-2295708131

I've had unpleasant experiences dealing with custom themes.

Thanks! How do I change the white background colour in folders?

Hi @xrayer Please provide a YouTube link where you noticed that the ad blocker was detected!

Exactly, despite my age, I use my father's era OS Vista! One of the reasons I joined.

That's what most of European OS users see, I think.

"uBlock origin is definitely more powerful than Ublock Origin Lite. You can run both at the same time since they don't use the same API, but it's useless, especially on Brave." https://www.reddit.com/r/brave_browser/comments/1drsl17/ublock_origin_or_ublockorigin_lite_in_2024/

Thanks, marvellous!

Thanks for asking! As long as no new errors occur and everything is running well, there is no need to update. I'm travelling on so many fronts that my time needs to be well managed. Or is something not working? I can't see any serious problems at the moment. uBlock Origin Legacy 1.16.4.35 is running fine here.

I've changed my mind about Brave, all due to the latest developments on their forum.

Thanks for getting back on topic. What's there you don't understand? There's real and there's fake. Like fake Supermium, for example.

Recently got myself a rebranded WD (previously made by Hitachi), it's of course identical, 10TB WD 7200rpm. Very Noisy! Looks like it has "smart defrag" made by the device. I'm not happy with the purchase at all. Full specs: HGST WD Ultrastar DC HC510 10TB 7200 RPM SATA 6Gb/s 3.5" Helium Platform Enterprise Hard Disk Drive - HUH721010ALE604 (0F27606) Price approx 250-300 Euros.