Leaderboard

https://github.com/tenox7/wrp https://github.com/ttalvitie/browservice what is the best?

Tried that, nothing strange happened! Moreover, in my case Office 2003 which is only 32 bits can save documents and open documents without issues.

"define is not defined" isn't bad as well: a very interesting proposition from a linguistic-logical perspective .

Try running any 32-bit programs. For example, you can run Notepad from the SysWOW64 folder, and then try opening the file (Ctrl-O or File -> Open...), or write some characters and try saving to a file. Those will not work at all since the open/save dialog won't show anymore after March 2023 build.

Never got any troubles with the German DeLOCK IDE->SATA Adapters. Need my German store link ? I can send it to you via messages. There also was some made in Austria, but very expensive.

yeah, i just ran exe and it updated just fine(atleast from .129)

Of course you can - my update was smooth (64-bit).

As always, thank you for the fixes you post here ; what I want to ask is, are you using a "one-size-fits-all" polyfill for "winhelponline.com", "text-compare.com" and "przedszkolowo.pl" (to fix "static") or does each one of them require specific code? If the former, would you be so kind as to post that standalone polyfill? I tend now to leave Palefill disabled in St52 and would much rather use a "userscript" implementation of your "static" polyfill, much like in the case of your "structuredClone()" one ... Thanks in advance

https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2023/04/stable-channel-desktop-update.html new version for 2012r2, probably works on 7 as previous one, will try install and report EDIT: works fine, links here: x64: https://dl.google.com/release2/chrome/okwuqsvyf2bgppzm2557sokhb4_109.0.5414.141/109.0.5414.141_chrome_installer.exe x86: https://dl.google.com/release2/chrome/accqbpi5rq2su3yx4qzgu2zdrl4q_109.0.5414.141/109.0.5414.141_chrome_installer.exe

Very cool! It's been a while since I used your 45 fork...it'll be interesting to give this new release a try, for old times' sake, to see what that old 45 engine can still do. Hoping you have a good weekend, Roy--and thank you, always!

For installing unsigned web extensions in Serpent 52 and 55 (moebius! ) they have first to be compatible with these browsers. Deleting any files from the folder META-INF of a xpi file does not do anything, and is therefore no solution. Furthermore, only setting the preference xpinstall.signatures.required to false, which is already the default setting in Serpent, is no solution, either. To install such an unsigned web extension permanently (there is no META-INF folder in its archive, or it has been removed) in Serpent, the file manifest.json has to be modified to assign a unique ID to this extension. For testing purpose, I did that in the case of the web extension save-as-ebook 1.4.2 loaded from https://github.com/alexadam/save-as-ebook/tree/master/web-extension which lacks of such an ID in its file manifest.json. After assigning a unique ID to it, I packed the complete extension into a zip file and renamed it to save-as-ebook-1.4.2.xpi. If done, it can be installed then as usual, works as it should and also survives the next browser restart. Without enabling add-on debugging which would only result in a temporary loading of the web extension anyway! As a unique ID, I chose user-save-as-ebook@email.com. Here is a screenshot as a proof: Cheers, AstroSkipper

True.

Advance Notice: there will be no UXP based builds tomorrow, but there will be a mozilla45tff release tomorrow.

Indeed ! Page 3 to be exact. https://msfn.org/board/topic/175170-root-certificates-and-revoked-certificates-for-windows-xp/page/3/ Cheers !

Is it good this browser? It says it works from 98 and above

yes