Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/09/2021 in all areas
-
@Cixert, hi , in 360 Extreme Explorer russians did not remove all telemetry , it's only *partially* removed , please add this information. You may see by yourself in my posts. This one , for example. https://msfn.org/board/topic/182304-extreme-explorer-360-chromium-78-86-general-discussion/page/15/?tab=comments#comment-11942532 points
-
I was never able to find a "homepage" for it. @user57 originally posted the links and I copied them over to this thread -> https://msfn.org/board/topic/182304-extreme-explorer-360-chromium-78-86-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=11989521 point
-
Thanks everyone! Unfortunately I'm tied up doing jury service at the moment so I haven't been able to give the time I would like to to troubleshoot this. One important thing I have now done is to try my netbook, which also has XP on it, but it hasn't had the most recent Root Certificates update applied. It also does not have ProxHTTPSProxy installed. IE8 and the HOSTS file and pretty much everything else are unmodified, apart from IE8 having the TLS 1.2 enablement mods. Trying to access the http version of that Sky logo works in IE8 on the netbook, but only after a very long delay, like about a minute. This agrees with the behaviour on the main machine, where things usually do eventually appear in IE8 and Eudora (which uses the IE8 engine to display e-mails) but there is a huge delay. So, whatever the problem is it seems to be affecting both machines, and is presumably nothing to do with the Root Certificates update, or ProxHTTPSProxy.1 point
-
1 point
-
WinNTSetup 4.6.3 - "Disable the new taskbar icons of windows 10" tweak removes the new "Feeds" - fixed crash with differencing VHD - fixed vhd icon right click - vhd icon tooltip shows VHD chain1 point
-
Please stick with ONE card. What your "previous card" was able to do on W2k has nothing to do with a different card on W98. You are running this thread IN CIRCLES when you do that and only turns other people away in trying to offer assistance. Having said that... Just because W98 installs hardware and driver and everything looks good in Device Manager, that does not mean that hardware is even capable of communicating with your router. I can install an AM/FM radio in my car and the car's electrical system will see that radio and it will power up and everything, that doesn't mean it will pull in SiriusXM satellite radio or enable communications with OnStar.1 point
-
FYI - I just generated a list of all updates (total = 21,348 links) related to 32-bit / 64-bit Windows XP by borrowing something from WSUS Offline Update: https://download.wsusoffline.net Basically I just needed to get several files: package.xml gsort.exe XSLT.vbs xp.xsl Download the latest version of http://download.windowsupdate.com/microsoftupdate/v6/wsusscan/wsusscn2.cab first, then run this to extract the file package.xml afterwards: expand.exe wsusscn2.cab -F:package.cab . expand.exe package.cab package.xml gsort.exe https://trac.wsusoffline.net/trac.fcgi/export/1126/tags/wsusoffline12.0/bin/gsort.exe XSLT.vbs https://trac.wsusoffline.net/trac.fcgi/export/1126/tags/wsusoffline12.0/cmd/XSLT.vbs Then I created my own file called xp.xsl and that's based on another file extract-update-cab-exe-ids-and-locations.xsl as follows: https://trac.wsusoffline.net/trac.fcgi/export/1126/tags/wsusoffline12.0/xslt/extract-update-cab-exe-ids-and-locations.xsl Simply save it as xp.xsl and here's another copy: https://pastebin.com/EB1101eN <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:__="http://schemas.microsoft.com/msus/2004/02/OfflineSync" version="1.0"> <xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="no" method="text" /> <xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:for-each select="__:OfflineSyncPackage/__:FileLocations/__:FileLocation"> <xsl:if test="contains(@Url, 'windowsxp')"> <xsl:value-of select="@Url" /> <xsl:text> </xsl:text> </xsl:if> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> Finally put all files under the same directory and then run this, that's how I generated my own list of updates called xp.txt with 21,348 links: cscript.exe //Nologo //B //E:vbs XSLT.vbs package.xml xp.xsl x.txt gsort.exe -u -T . x.txt >xp.txt Not sure if there were anything missing from the latest version of http://download.windowsupdate.com/microsoftupdate/v6/wsusscan/wsusscn2.cab or otherwise? For instance, the oldest version of package.xml available should be https://web.archive.org/web/20051024011634/http://%E2%80%8Bdownload.windowsupdate.com/microsoftupdate/v6/wsusscan/wsusscan.cab and it's dated October 2005. Obviously the abandoned Microsoft JVM http://www.download.windowsupdate.com/msdownload/update/v3-19990518/cabpool/msjavwu_8073687b82d41db93f4c2a04af2b34d.exe could still be found inside that particular version of package.xml. However, it's no longer available in the latest version of package.xml anymore.1 point
-
May I ask how you managed to get it installed before packing it in your tool? I, like every other vista lover coming out of the woodwork recently, am working on my own Vista project, compiling an extremely detailed guide for creating an updated ISO installer image with as little post installation work as possible. The majority of the work, and time lol, is getting spent consolidating the 15 years worth of troubleshooting information across the hundreds of forum threads scattered over the web. Once it's eventually finished and polished I aim to post it somewhere so no one has to wrestle with Vistas update/installation baboonery again.1 point
-
Thanks for pointing that out. It sounds like final definitions were on May 19: https://knowledge.broadcom.com/external/article/164751/end-of-support-life-for-endpoint-protect.html1 point
-
1 point
-
New build of Serpent/UXP for XP! Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20210605-e29e57e-uxp-7f6f1c664-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20210605-e29e57e-uxp-7f6f1c664-xpmod.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20210605-e29e57e-uxp-7f6f1c664-xpmod-ia32.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32 NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.3a1.win32-git-20210605-411f285e0-uxp-7f6f1c664-xpmod.7z Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.3a1.win32-git-20210605-411f285e0-uxp-7f6f1c664-xpmod-sse.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.3a1.win64-git-20210605-411f285e0-uxp-7f6f1c664-xpmod.7z Official UXP changes since my last build: - Revert "Issue #21 - Remove TelemertyVFS" (349346d0b) - Issue #1772 - Stop using legacy code page conversion for file paths on Linux. (c921ad59d) - Issue #1774 - Make menulist-button visible again in gtk3 (0a0830ba8) - Merge pull request 'Issue #1774 - Make menulist-button visible again in gtk3' (#1775) from jobbautista9/UXP:master into master (27e7b312a) - Revert "Issue #1774 - Make menulist-button visible again in gtk3" (6272d48e8) - Issue #1774 - Add metrics to the editable menulist-button for GTK3 (42cf1ad41) - [toolkit] Exclude printer spew from troubleshooting information. (ce71c0fe3) - [js] Fix invalid early return in BaselineFrame::trace. (9acd98298) - [js] Fix porting typo (7f6f1c664) No official Basilisk changes since my last build. Official Pale-Moon changes since my last build: - Back-end branch pointer update. (c9f73ec3f) - Rename "Web Developer" menu entries to "Developer Tools" (29908be27) - Issue #1870 - Add try/catch and console logging for failing autocomplete popup. (411f285e0) My changes since my last build: - skipped "Rename "Web Developer" menu entries to "Developer Tools" (29908be27)" - update NSS builtin certstore to May 2021 version from mozilla upstream. (6026e19d2)1 point
-
myself, i stopped caring about any win release ever since win 8 betas came out IMO win7 was last "shiny knight", everything after crappozolla1 point
-
It was available first time, actually, in Pentium 3, but that was pre-9\11 world and this did not fly well and was quickly strike down by EU. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_III#Controversy_about_privacy_issues After 9\11 right-wingers rig the world and you all should comply and be obedient slave citizen or nine-eleven will happen again. P.S. I long time want to ask, will roytam adapt 29 version of PM? They promise "Google WebComponent" support on they release notes with 29... Maybe this question was asked before, but i never see it. So what will be with 29 for XP?1 point