Leaderboard

This has been indeed asked multiple times here , the most recent one was just six pages back in this very thread... : https://msfn.org/board/topic/182647-my-browser-builds-part-3/?do=findComment&comment=1199196 Answered previously by roytam1 on Feb 8th: https://msfn.org/board/topic/180462-my-browser-builds-part-2/?do=findComment&comment=1195399 My own answer from back in February: https://msfn.org/board/topic/180462-my-browser-builds-part-2/?do=findComment&comment=1195384 (NB: Not meant to offend anyone ... ) TL:DR: appVersion numbers simply don't tell the whole story and people should not just stick to them... Latest NM 28.10.3a1 has all the code found inside unstable official Pale Moon 29.3.0a1, minus portions of the official code it was decided we shouldn't adopt, plus code we have kept but upstream have gotten rid of... And since you're anxious about Web Components implementation, upstream haven't made any leaps towards that goal, there's a dedicated issue in their tracker https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1361 coupled with https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1344 where you can monitor their progress (or lack of... ); until recently bounty material, if/when something is added there, be sure it'll find its way into New Moon, too, irrespective of its advertised version number... Is it clear for you now? Best wishes!

That's what I understood from that thread I linked to. See also here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1076445 Don't be pedantic. I don't care. My days here are numbered. I wish them success with their data after that, haha.

@yoltboy01 : Make sure not to link any of your endeavours here, else you'll get summarily BANNED... (FWIW, I'm not even sure that "site" you simply "mentioned" will go down well with the mods here... Just friendly advice, nothing more... )

No need to worry about that, it doesnt work anyways, i have the 7000 beta build and even after replacing wploc you get a version mismatch error. If you replace all the wmp dll files it complains for kernelbase.dll and other missing functions. I even had a separate topic few years back, ive tried this many times but to no avail.

Protoweb is classic web proxy run by volunteers. It goal is to provide range of Classic Internet and Network services for the retro computing community. Sites on service been crawled from archive.org and then reconstructed by volunteers to old glory (fixing downloads, missing images etc.). Service currently provides hundreds of classic webpages and classic ftp sites between 1996-2001. Using Protoweb does not require any extra software or registaration, you get full access to service just by changing browser proxy settings. All resources on Protoweb are free to access natively on any classic/modern browser supporting http proxies and more is being added. For more information visit at https://protoweb.org/

good it is working for you Also in case anyone else got old machine without network card and would want use it Protoweb (like me) or just want enjoy going internet with Dial-up connection experience for nostalgia you can use virtual PPP serial modem running on raspberry pi or other linux system. It can do speeds up to 115200bps and works with standard Dial-up software. I am currently using it to browse Protoweb on my Digital Venturis 466 computer running Netscape Navigator 3 Gold on Windows 3.11 WFW. Dial-up is being handled by Trumpet Winsock. It also works natively with Windows 95 and higher built in Microsoft Dial-up networking

Ok, but actually I don't have any problems with it. Here (note: I tested this in sandbox): I bet others are gonna be interested in this as well.

ok if any problems let me know

You're welcome. Also, nah thanks, I am actually going to try what the start guide tells me.

Thanks, also feel free to join project usergroups on site for assistance or talk about protoweb, old web etc (I am on discord group).

I have nothing to say expect that: it's a nice find. I like browsing in the old times.

Yeah.

this is included for a long time: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commit/04671d8d62b1085e8a6e7eaaff4de8efe3ad4ce3 actually this means reverting https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=958368 , which has some risk since this change is landed for very long time.

From my experience , the results may vary with different hardware . You can just place your three modules into that PC and test how fast (or slow) it performs. There are plenty of benchmarking tools. And then you can try placing them in another slots , yes , it can perform quite different . Then try to add 2GB to the rest of them (3x4GB + 2GB). Try NOT to leave corsair in the first slot though , since Corsair tends to develop faulty sectors right at the start of a given module , which will prevent you from booting at all.

That page is 12 years old, and their download link leads to a Deviant Art page that doesn’t exist.

use nLite 1.4.9.3 to integrate 64-bit SATA/AHCI your disk controller and WinVBlock drivers to WinXP 64-bit ISO image (if in the bios there is an option of the disk mode in PATA, IDE, Compatibility then turn it on and you can not integrate the SATA driver) rename the ISO image to xp.iso connect a USB flash drive (1-2GB USB 2.0) format it to FAT32 with USB Disk Storage Format install GRUB4DOS on this USB flash drive copy the files to the flash drive: grldr, menu.lst, to subfolder images: dummy.ima, xp.iso boot from this USB and select: TXT-Setup WinXP - phase 1 when the message to restart the computer appears, restart it from USB but this time select: GUI-Setup WinXP - phase 2 when phase 2 of the installation is complete and the computer restarts, boot it from the hard disk (remove the USB flash drive) Note1: You must have at least 1GB RAM for the xp.iso image to fit in the memory Note2: If the flash drive is detected by the BIOS as USB-FDD and not USB-HDD, then you have to remove this lines from the menu.lst file: map (hd0) (hd1) map (hd1) (hd0) winvblock.zip usb_disk_storage_format.zip g4d_install.zip grldr menu.lst

Officially, it does not support, but I would try the drivers for individual devices from the manufacturers websites e.g. for Intel HD Graphics 3000/4000 driver is winxp64_145111.exe

I wonder what happened. Well the 64-bit version's working fine so I suppose this isn't too big of an issue. It's working fine for me. I installed the Media Foundation Platform though in the mfplatsetup zip...

Thanks, that's fascinating stuff! I bought my first PC in 1993 in the Windows 3.1 days, but I never attempted dual booting until I dual booted Windows 98 and Windows 2000, in 2000! I thought that having an NT option would be better for video editing, which I'd just got into, faster and more stable than Windows 98. I waited ages for Windows 2000 to come out because I wanted to wait for FAT32 capability on the NT system, as Windows 98 couldn't use NTFS of course.

LGS has reached EOL for Vista,7 and 8.X officially as of 2021.4.3830.