Leaderboard

This has been indeed asked multiple times here , the most recent one was just six pages back in this very thread... : https://msfn.org/board/topic/182647-my-browser-builds-part-3/?do=findComment&comment=1199196 Answered previously by roytam1 on Feb 8th: https://msfn.org/board/topic/180462-my-browser-builds-part-2/?do=findComment&comment=1195399 My own answer from back in February: https://msfn.org/board/topic/180462-my-browser-builds-part-2/?do=findComment&comment=1195384 (NB: Not meant to offend anyone ... ) TL:DR: appVersion numbers simply don't tell the whole story and people should not just stick to them... Latest NM 28.10.3a1 has all the code found inside unstable official Pale Moon 29.3.0a1, minus portions of the official code it was decided we shouldn't adopt, plus code we have kept but upstream have gotten rid of... And since you're anxious about Web Components implementation, upstream haven't made any leaps towards that goal, there's a dedicated issue in their tracker https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1361 coupled with https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1344 where you can monitor their progress (or lack of... ); until recently bounty material, if/when something is added there, be sure it'll find its way into New Moon, too, irrespective of its advertised version number... Is it clear for you now? Best wishes!

That's what I understood from that thread I linked to. See also here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1076445 Don't be pedantic. I don't care. My days here are numbered. I wish them success with their data after that, haha.

@yoltboy01 : Make sure not to link any of your endeavours here, else you'll get summarily BANNED... (FWIW, I'm not even sure that "site" you simply "mentioned" will go down well with the mods here... Just friendly advice, nothing more... )

No need to worry about that, it doesnt work anyways, i have the 7000 beta build and even after replacing wploc you get a version mismatch error. If you replace all the wmp dll files it complains for kernelbase.dll and other missing functions. I even had a separate topic few years back, ive tried this many times but to no avail.

Yeah.

this is included for a long time: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commit/04671d8d62b1085e8a6e7eaaff4de8efe3ad4ce3 actually this means reverting https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=958368 , which has some risk since this change is landed for very long time.

From my experience , the results may vary with different hardware . You can just place your three modules into that PC and test how fast (or slow) it performs. There are plenty of benchmarking tools. And then you can try placing them in another slots , yes , it can perform quite different . Then try to add 2GB to the rest of them (3x4GB + 2GB). Try NOT to leave corsair in the first slot though , since Corsair tends to develop faulty sectors right at the start of a given module , which will prevent you from booting at all.

That page is 12 years old, and their download link leads to a Deviant Art page that doesn’t exist.

I wonder what happened. Well the 64-bit version's working fine so I suppose this isn't too big of an issue. It's working fine for me. I installed the Media Foundation Platform though in the mfplatsetup zip...

Thanks, that's fascinating stuff! I bought my first PC in 1993 in the Windows 3.1 days, but I never attempted dual booting until I dual booted Windows 98 and Windows 2000, in 2000! I thought that having an NT option would be better for video editing, which I'd just got into, faster and more stable than Windows 98. I waited ages for Windows 2000 to come out because I wanted to wait for FAT32 capability on the NT system, as Windows 98 couldn't use NTFS of course.

LGS has reached EOL for Vista,7 and 8.X officially as of 2021.4.3830.