MageJubi Posted December 28, 2006 Posted December 28, 2006 Hmmm. One has to wonder at the accuracy, since I'm actually 200 mi from the server--not the 100 listed. Still, not too bad for being out in the woods, 200 miles from the nearest real city....and sure beats the 43.3kbps dialup 3 yrs ago.
jftuga Posted December 28, 2006 Posted December 28, 2006 At my house, although I don't use the 'net at home as much as I use to. The latency is horrible compared to others who have posted.-John
IcemanND Posted January 4, 2007 Posted January 4, 2007 When you send the students on break the connection is better.
jcarle Posted January 5, 2007 Author Posted January 5, 2007 When you send the students on break the connection is better.That's like a bandwidth orgasm.
N1K Posted January 5, 2007 Posted January 5, 2007 I thought that my score will be worst of all but it definitely ain't
rendrag Posted January 9, 2007 Posted January 9, 2007 (edited) work:home: Edited November 24, 2007 by rendrag
Zxian Posted January 10, 2007 Posted January 10, 2007 Hehe... university network speeds rule... I think I've actually been able to get higher uploads than that before. I've uploaded files to external sites at 2.5MB/s... oh well - can't complain. EditHehe... just got a better speed. I'll try again tonight when there are fewer people on campus.
DL. Posted January 11, 2007 Posted January 11, 2007 On my lousy 8/0.8 Mbit.I had a very nice 100/100 Fibre-LAN connection before (not very uncommon in Sweden), but I unfortunately had to move to another apartment. I got a maximum of around 90-something Mbit/s in both directions with that one. The price of that connection was about 50$/month, my current 8/0.8 costs the same.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now