Hmmm. One has to wonder at the accuracy, since I'm actually 200 mi from the server--not the 100 listed. Still, not too bad for being out in the woods, 200 miles from the nearest real city....and sure beats the 43.3kbps dialup 3 yrs ago.

At my house, although I don't use the 'net at home as much as I use to. The latency is horrible compared to others who have posted.

-John

This is what I have at work:

When you send the students on break the connection is better.

When you send the students on break the connection is better.

That's like a bandwidth orgasm.

That's like a bandwidth orgasm.

LMAO!

Hahaha... you got that right...

A bandgasm?

I thought that my score will be worst of all but it definitely ain't

work:

home:

Edited November 24, 200718 yr by rendrag

Looking fine. Came in handy for setting up QoS.

Hehe... university network speeds rule...

I think I've actually been able to get higher uploads than that before. I've uploaded files to external sites at 2.5MB/s... oh well - can't complain.

Edit

Hehe... just got a better speed. I'll try again tonight when there are fewer people on campus.

and they said I was having a bandgasm.

On my lousy 8/0.8 Mbit.

I had a very nice 100/100 Fibre-LAN connection before (not very uncommon in Sweden), but I unfortunately had to move to another apartment. I got a maximum of around 90-something Mbit/s in both directions with that one. The price of that connection was about 50$/month, my current 8/0.8 costs the same.