Aegis Posted February 13, 2006 Author Share Posted February 13, 2006 @GdoggThere shouldn't be any reason why it can't support 3DMark, but I haven't tried it yet. And I've changed my plans about it, there will be a 32-bit version available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdogg Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 (edited) good stuff, still many held back, by something mmx made, lol, cause wasn't mmx just another name for 64 bit lol, cant wait for a SSE3 windows xp or something now.haha Edited February 14, 2006 by gdogg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aegis Posted February 14, 2006 Author Share Posted February 14, 2006 @GdoggMaybe you shouldn't be talking about processor instructions if you have no idea what they are . MMX and SSE3 are multimedia technologies designed to increase performance on multimedia applications. Only applications should implement it; operating systems only need to support it (which XP does). And MMX dates back to the 1990's, so I doubt it's another name for 64-bit. Next time, don't make such a fool out of yourself . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdogg Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 hahah, i guess I heard wrongmaybe I should google too, no I make other look foolish ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xieje Posted February 14, 2006 Share Posted February 14, 2006 Ghehehe Aegis and gdogg xDWhat a funny guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJARRRPCGP Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 (edited) I Deleted IE and I use FireFox instead and I Still get updates... I deleted the WHOLE IE Folder and the Reg. tooI'm sorry to tell you this, parts of IE are also located in the Windows\System32 directory, just like many applications. To delete IE, you're required to have at least stuff removed from some DLL files in the Windows\System32 directory too! nLite does that. Edited February 15, 2006 by RJARRRPCGP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aegis Posted February 15, 2006 Author Share Posted February 15, 2006 New poll: should CD-ROM and audio functionality be a default, or as an addon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spazmire11 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 i think if you are going to remove it make it optinal to remove, if the user wants it gone then remove it if not then keep it.a good feild of games still require cds remember, about the only ones that dont as i think would be steam based ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripken204 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 why wouldnt we want cd-rom support? and what do u mean my audio funcionality? that there would just be no sound at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aegis Posted February 16, 2006 Author Share Posted February 16, 2006 @Ripken204Reducing the number of drivers considerably speeds up boot. Some people might enjoy playing games without sound, or they may be 3-D professionals (whom I'm also targeting with GE) that don't require sound functionality. I've decided that I'm making all nonessential components optional unless the user decides otherwise. This includes USB support, PS/2 support, etc. This helps in creating a minimal footprint for a variety of systems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripken204 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 dont we need usb or ps/2 for our keyboard/mouse? and since this is called "Gamer's Edition" why wouldnt we want sound?but as long as i am able to add it in later, ill be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
breadandbubbles Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 300 replies?why isnt this a sticky? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sofer Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 @3-R4Z0RThe project isn't suppose to be x86, but nothing's stopping you from not applying the x86-x64 patch . I wouldn't recommend keeping it x86 though, as Windows 2000 is more optimized for that task.Also, I'm too busy on tweaking the project to have any time to talk much about the project . Bunch of new features, though I might have to scale back on some old features because of 64-bit compatibility issues.I'm sorry, i'm still very new to modding windows installs and the like, anyone mind telling me why win 2000 is better for x86 processors, and where I can get this x86-x64 patch to use when GE comes out? (using an intel Centrino 760, got it for christmas, right before the Dual Cores came out )--Sofer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3aces Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 @Ripken204Reducing the number of drivers considerably speeds up boot. Some people might enjoy playing games without sound, or they may be 3-D professionals (whom I'm also targeting with GE) that don't require sound functionality. I've decided that I'm making all nonessential components optional unless the user decides otherwise. This includes USB support, PS/2 support, etc. This helps in creating a minimal footprint for a variety of systems.i say u make these optional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nakatomi2010 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 @3-R4Z0RThe project isn't suppose to be x86, but nothing's stopping you from not applying the x86-x64 patch . I wouldn't recommend keeping it x86 though, as Windows 2000 is more optimized for that task.Also, I'm too busy on tweaking the project to have any time to talk much about the project . Bunch of new features, though I might have to scale back on some old features because of 64-bit compatibility issues.I'm sorry, i'm still very new to modding windows installs and the like, anyone mind telling me why win 2000 is better for x86 processors, and where I can get this x86-x64 patch to use when GE comes out? (using an intel Centrino 760, got it for christmas, right before the Dual Cores came out )--SoferThere is no "x86-x64" patch, if you want to run in x64 you need to not only have a 64-bit processor, but a 64-bit OS, which essentially needs to be built from the ground up... There will never be a patch... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now