Lezend Posted October 23, 2002 Posted October 23, 2002 Yessh. I have Visiontek. I like it. Weird I guess the Ram doesn't do much different. I have 2 gigs+. Oh well, mine is fast enough for all my games. I am happy. Not that I care for those score.
Lezend Posted October 23, 2002 Posted October 23, 2002 hey Lezend, cool sig Thanks. Was messing around with icons and figures might be interesting to stick them in sig.
Snoop Posted October 23, 2002 Posted October 23, 2002 elite, i just set mine to best performance, and i break 10k. the lod hacks/cheats/whateveryouwant tocallthem only give about 100 point increasei fail to belive that as ive seen screenshots of 3dmark when people have used tweakers to set the LOD bias and the graphics look really awful even worse than playstation one graphics
Tinker Posted October 23, 2002 Posted October 23, 2002 Hey elite, what is LOD? The graphics suck in my screen shot because I saved it as a .jpg...I did no tweaking on mine, it is as it came out of the box. If there are tweaks on it or defaults that I can test it under please let me know what they are.....This helps me to learn as I am new to the fine art of graphics and video cards......
Snoop Posted October 23, 2002 Posted October 23, 2002 level of detail i really dont know much about tweaking nvidia cards but u can alter the lod bias far more than the nvida graphics drivers let u by downloading a tweaker im not sure what the tweakers are for nvidia cards but u can alter the lod so in the game tests the texures are really really blurred and look like s*** to gain extra points but i see no point in benchmarking with settings u wouldnt dream of using for games.i wasnt acusing your of making you graphics look like crap to get a good score either i know geforce4 cards can get 9000-11000 with tiny tweaks that dont alter the graphics much.i was just saying most people with geforce cards do it.
MSNwar Posted October 23, 2002 Posted October 23, 2002 Tinker, what is the url for the compare please?MSNwar I did not do an on-line compare. Those are the reports for the on system test. What are the advantages of the on-line compare? Is this just one way that 3D Mark can hassle you to buy there product?OK, OK......... Tinker's ScoreTinker, I believe the reason is so that all things are considered equal.
Porn Loader Posted October 25, 2002 Posted October 25, 2002 i fail to belive that as ive seen screenshots of 3dmark when people have used tweakers to set the LOD bias and the graphics look really awful even worse than playstation one graphicsi score a little less than 10100 with lod set to best performance in the adapter tab... if i use rivatuner and set the lod to 3.0, it does look like crap, but the highest ive seen on a non-overclocked score was 10185. you can get better scores by running the game tests 1 by 1 while changing the lod.. but i dont consider that a "default" benchmark.
FthrJACK Posted November 5, 2002 Posted November 5, 2002 how to get 20372 marks with a radeon 9700:20372 marks
Lezend Posted November 5, 2002 Posted November 5, 2002 how to get 20372 marks with a radeon 9700:20372 marksLike any of us able to do that... more like one time deal.
Doggie Posted November 5, 2002 Posted November 5, 2002 hmm.. i'm too ashamed at my score .. lets says its between 1000 and 2900 .. thats cause i only gots a geforce2 mx400
XPerties Posted November 7, 2002 Author Posted November 7, 2002 hmm.. i'm too ashamed at my score .. lets says its between 1000 and 2900 .. thats cause i only gots a geforce2 mx400 did you run 2000 or 2001, try 2000 like i siad before. Look at my score. It was the lowest but then again look at my video card and compare them to the rest. Thats why i got a low score. The rest of my hardware is good.
Neo - Matrix Posted November 9, 2002 Posted November 9, 2002 I Don't know why i can't save my result test...But my is the Best.427 3DMarksCeleron 1.0 @ 1.2 - 256RAM - Asus Tusi-M (SiS 630ET) Onboard 16 Shared Video Memory SiS 630 (305) GPU Card - 3 HD's 20.1 ATA 100.Windows XP SP1 Corp.That's Cool...I need a Better computer...
Neo - Matrix Posted November 10, 2002 Posted November 10, 2002 427 Neo - Matrix (Unverified) Celeron 1.0 MHz @ 1.2 MHz, RAM 256 MB, Asus Tusi-M (SiS 630ET) Onboard 16 Shared Video MemoryTook some time to make a summary of the scores. Where a Compare link was not posted I simply termed the score Unverified.Now lets be honest and post your system scores - not some other system okay.€L1T€ is a lying llamaBut I'm telling the Truth... thi is my computer.I'm checking here.. but 3dmark don't save my result... When i try to register at madonion... it's say's it's impossible to finish... and sometimes I see 404 - 500 and 503 erros.
Drewdatrip Posted November 10, 2002 Posted November 10, 2002 Its all good Neo we belive ya..besides no one would lie about scores that low!.. (J/K)=Drew
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now