August 4Aug 4 On 7/22/2026 at 3:11 PM, Jody Thornton said: XP and Vista can now be damned No good statement!
August 4Aug 4 3 hours ago, AstroSkipper said: No good statement! Meh ! My opinion . Vista and XP are just too old. I used to be a lot more "vintagey" with operating systems, but i find it just holds you back. Worrying about compatibility and what not just starts to waste time. I'm even in the process of migrating to LTSC because Windows 8 is starting to get long in the tooth, mostly because all of these browser fork authors are changing their minds on a whim about development direction. One starts to realize there's more to life than worrying about areall this stuff. To each their own though.
August 4Aug 4 14 minutes ago, Jody Thornton said: To each their own though. Of course. Not being a real administrator is much better. But you were already used to that from Windows 8. So nothing new under the sun. BTW, my Windows XP runs perfectly. Edited August 4Aug 4 by AstroSkipper
August 4Aug 4 @ED_Sln - Is it possible to totally remove/disable the "AI" features in the e3k Chromium fork? Edited August 4Aug 4 by NotHereToPlayGames
August 5Aug 5 How do I remove support for "colour emojis on Windows XP through Windows 8.1 created by @mjd7989."?
August 7Aug 7 Author On 8/5/2026 at 1:28 AM, NotHereToPlayGames said: Is it possible to totally remove/disable the "AI" features in the e3k Chromium fork? It cannot be completely disabled or removed. In version 151, the flag that disables AI in the address bar was removed, but you can disable it using the --disable-features=AiModeOmniboxEntryPoint On 8/5/2026 at 7:25 AM, EliraFriesnan said: How do I remove support for "colour emojis on Windows XP through Windows 8.1 created by @mjd7989."? Delete the files you extracted from the dwrite_xp_x86 folder in the webgl_hw_and_dwrite.zip archive.
August 12Aug 12 Author The version for Windows XP has already reached v114. It's just one step away from the supported v115. https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7/releases/download/old/firefox-114.0.3.en-US.win32.installer.exe https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7/releases/download/old/firefox-114.0.3.en-US.win64.installer.exe
Saturday at 06:20 AM3 days Author Firefox ESR 115.40 for Win XP.https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7-REWORK/releases/download/debug/firefox-115.40.0.en-US.win32.installer.exehttps://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7-REWORK/releases/download/debug/firefox-115.40.0.en-US.win64.installer.exe The x64 installer does not work on XP and Vista, you need to extract the installer.Firefox 117.0a1 for Win XP.https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7-REWORK/releases/download/debug/firefox-117.0a1.en-US.win32.installer.exehttps://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7-REWORK/releases/download/debug/firefox-117.0a1.en-US.win64.installer.exe The x64 installer is now working.
6 hours ago6 hr Starting with the next release, his Chromium will natively support Widevine at the L3 level on Windows 7, without the need for any patches of widevinecdm.dll.https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7-REWORK/issues/93#issuecomment-5409097804 Edited 6 hours ago6 hr by mjd79
1 hour ago1 hr On Windows XP, rework builds of Firefox still saves files to Desktop instead of Downloads folder like regular Firefox should. But even WebGL 2 software works, though it's very slow (Google Earth web for example)Also, no x64 builds after 117.0a1, so only 32 bit ones are available (118.0a1 and 120.0a1) Edited 1 hour ago1 hr by BW134
44 minutes ago44 min 16 minutes ago, BW134 said:On Windows XP, rework builds of Firefox still saves files to Desktop instead of Downloads folder like regular Firefox should. But even WebGL 2 software works, though it's very slow (Google Earth web for example)Also, no x64 builds after 117.0a1, so only 32 bit ones are available (118.0a1 and 120.0a1)Have you reported this issue on GitHub? If not, please do it, and it will likely be fixed in a future release. As for the lack of 64-bit builds, I assume it’s to save time so he can release new versions more quickly, though that’s just my guess.
Create an account or sign in to comment