D.Draker Posted March 27 Posted March 27 11 hours ago, Dave-H said: It was a silly thing to do in the first place. AFAIK it was because a few users reported that they were having problems with Twitch. These problems went away if the experimental features were enabled. What the developer should probably have done is simply to tell them to switch them on. What he actually did was change the default settings so they were on by default. This was fine until people found problems with other sites, like the British Gas one. Fortunately this has been corrected, but presumably the problems with Twitch are still there with the default settings now, and that does need to be addressed. It doesn't explain why there was a desperate need to enable those experimental, not yet implemented features, unless it's indeed the old version 122. 126 and 132 Chromium, both work fine with Twitch, with disabled experimental features, so? 3
D.Draker Posted March 27 Posted March 27 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: He "undid" that change. But only after the userbase basically said, "Hey! Don't do that! I did not sign up for 'experimental' features!" You again missed my post* and replied harshly, it resulted in a pointless discussion of what had been already discussed (about v.126). I reported about the same thing happening again in v.132 and Twitch. Why it happens, if this version is even *allegedly* newer - by the claims of the developer? 132 Chromium works fine with Twitch, with disabled experimental (default setting) features, so? What exactly you don't understand? You both still wanna say it's the real version 132? https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/page/123/#findComment-1279153 *This usually happens when members forget to hit "follow" button on my profile to stay in touch with my masterpieces. 3
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 27 Posted March 27 9 minutes ago, D.Draker said: *This usually happens when members forget to hit "follow" button on my profile to stay in touch with my masterpieces. Members that SOLICIT "followers" as often as you do SHOULD BE BANNED. Solicitation = Spam. 2
D.Draker Posted March 27 Posted March 27 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: Members that SOLICIT "followers" as often as you do SHOULD BE BANNED. Solicitation = Spam. Members that are DISRESPECTFUL, don't read posts BEFORE posting, therefore resulting in pointless discussions, as often as you do, SHOULD BE BANNED. Pointless discussions = Spam. You still don't answer my inconvenient question about the real number of the engine in Supermium, Twitch problems went back as soon as the developer returned those flags to "normal" condition. But why would they? The version was allegedly bumped to 132, so they shouldn't be there. no? xD 3
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 27 Posted March 27 12 minutes ago, D.Draker said: the real number of the engine in Supermium That's a question to post on GitHub, not in this thread. This is really just a "BS" thread that most of the Supermium userbase probably doesn't even "follow". YOUR fault as much as MINE. I'm MAN ENOUGH to share PARTIAL BLAME. Your EGO probably prevents you from doing the same. You have a God Complex, everybody should praise you. **NOT ME** FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE. I've had ENOUGH of YOU over the YEARS. Yeah, it's THAT simple! 2
D.Draker Posted March 27 Posted March 27 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: That's a question to post on GitHub, not in this thread. I shan't do this because of @Dave-H. My understanding is, Dave likes Supermium, @D.Draker is a known buster, if I start to ask such *inconvenient* questions there, the developer may flee github, too. 1
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 27 Posted March 27 1 minute ago, D.Draker said: if I start to ask such *inconvenient* questions there, the developer may flee github, too. Yeah, perhaps. I really want to remain optimistic on Supermium + Widevine = Netflix. As of now, Supermium can be made to pass some Widevine tests, but NOT FOR NETFLIX. And NO, it has nothing to do with "old hardware" because I am using Brave v134 + Widevine and Netflix WORKS on even my **OLDEST** hardware. 1
D.Draker Posted March 27 Posted March 27 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: I really want to remain optimistic on Supermium + Widevine = Netflix. Supermium made an attempt to incorporate some modern codecs, but those are open source LAV, so we can't say how well they would work with the paid streaming sites. 1
D.Draker Posted March 27 Posted March 27 (edited) 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: And NO, it has nothing to do with "old hardware" because I am using Brave v134 + Widevine and Netflix WORKS on even my **OLDEST** hardware. I have only one explanation - it's the content served. Yes, the content you order. I recently ordered Supernatural 2005, the one where only Crowley speaks normal language, and it was served in H265, my card could barely play it!!! And I have a 10 years old High end card with 12GB of Video RAM, nowhere near your 1gb stub, also 16 for the system RAM. But my CPU is similar to yours, the one that only a grand-grandpa would use. Edited March 27 by D.Draker article 1
Jody Thornton Posted March 27 Posted March 27 Just upgraded to R2. Look what happens to the tabs. I don't want to have to create a new profile each time (that was the way I was able to fix the tabs issue a week ago) Supermium Tabs Glitch 1
D.Draker Posted March 27 Posted March 27 11 hours ago, Jody Thornton said: Just upgraded to R2. Look what happens to the tabs. I don't want to have to create a new profile each time (that was the way I was able to fix the tabs issue a week ago) Supermium Tabs Glitch Jody, friend, there's a huge improvement for us, Vista fanatics, a simply marvellous browser! Released recently. Two versions. Choose marked "Vista". 136 (non-portable) https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/136.0.7063.0 134 Portable, Ungoofed. https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/ungoogled-chromium_134.0.6998.165 Made by a student from China, so I can't give any personal guarantees, you understand. 4
Jody Thornton Posted March 28 Posted March 28 2 hours ago, D.Draker said: Jody, friend, there's a huge improvement for us, Vista fanatics, a simply marvellous browser! Released recently. Two versions. Choose marked "Vista". 136 (non-portable) https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/136.0.7063.0 134 Portable, Ungoofed. https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/ungoogled-chromium_134.0.6998.165 Made by a student from China, so I can't give any personal guarantees, you understand. Sounds as though it's worth checking out. Thanks @D.Draker 1
hidao Posted March 28 Posted March 28 4 hours ago, D.Draker said: Jody, friend, there's a huge improvement for us, Vista fanatics, a simply marvellous browser! Released recently. Two versions. Choose marked "Vista". 136 (non-portable) https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/136.0.7063.0 134 Portable, Ungoofed. https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/ungoogled-chromium_134.0.6998.165 Made by a student from China, so I can't give any personal guarantees, you understand. It doesn't support to XP...
Jody Thornton Posted March 28 Posted March 28 11 hours ago, hidao said: It doesn't support to XP... I appreciate the heads up. Luckily for me, I'm not affected. 2
D.Draker Posted March 28 Posted March 28 (edited) On 3/27/2025 at 11:37 PM, hidao said: It doesn't support to XP... It also doesn't support "to" Win93, what a shame! On 3/27/2025 at 5:52 PM, NotHereToPlayGames said: This is really just a "BS" thread that most of the Supermium userbase probably doesn't even "follow". I don't think we have enough 4 year olds here to appreciate your language, sorry. In the meantime, the developer tries to evade the subject, suggesting a "solution" for the "new" version, I'm not even gonna comment on that. One would need to be really, really naive to still trust, esp. after this. Luckily for him, there's no D.Draker to ask, why a fix needs to applied for the allegedly new engine, lol. "I developed a method to ensure that the "experimental" web feature support could be used only on specific sites, but I thought this would not be problem this early in 132 ESR's life. With that in mind, twitch.tv should be defaulted to use it, but other sites should be untouched, to avoid breaking other websites such as British Gas." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1279#issuecomment-2760133080 Edited March 28 by D.Draker rough night consequential typos 2
Recommended Posts