December 25, 20241 yr Above post was requested to be deleted while I was testing the reply to that now-deleted post These download fine using UNGOOGLED Chromium, I have not tried in Supermium (just downloaded R6 but not yet tested). I have NO IDEA how to use or test an extended kernel. I have zero experience with them in the past and have no need for them at the present. Who knows for the future.
December 26, 20241 yr 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: These download fine using UNGOOGLED Chromium That's because "safe browse" is totally disabled in Ungoogled. So you might as well catch a virus. I understand, it can be over-protective at times.
December 26, 20241 yr 6 hours ago, Saxon said: So you might as well catch a virus. GOOD !!! I would have it no other way! My BROWSER is to BROWSE. Period. Nothing more, nothing less. I have never been hit with a virus in OVER THIRTY YEARS (the only virus I have ever been hit with was during my college intern years while running Firefox). We all have the choice in how we run our own computer. You are free to run yours your way. I am free to run mine my way. Your LEMMINGS are free to LIKE your posts. You are free to like theirs. Long live REP FARMING. et cetera... Nanny State Protectionism on one end of the spectrum (blame somebody else if you get hit by a virus but sell your soul in the process of somebody else protecting you from you). Net Savvy Accountability on the other end of the spectrum (blame your own negligence if you get hit by a virus because you clicked something you shouldn't have, downloaded something you shouldn't have, installed something you shouldn't have).
December 26, 20241 yr I mean, come on, let's be 100% honest and real. IF we lived in a world where it really is GOOGLE's or MICROSOFT's or APPLE's responsibility to "protect you from you"... then we would live in a world where NO BROWSER would ever be "allowed" to so much as READ an MSFN post regarding ANY browser fork, regarding ANY extended kernel, regarding ANY antivirus not embedded into Windows or ChromeOS, et cetera. Seriously. Edited December 26, 20241 yr by NotHereToPlayGames
December 28, 20241 yr I have reserved https://github.com/vxiiduu so that no more fraudsters can take advantage of it, I have put the original links from the Internet Archive.
December 28, 20241 yr Just now, Taha Amin Ghafuri said: I have reserved https://github.com/vxiiduu so that no more fraudsters can take advantage of it, I have put the original links from the Internet Archive. If I have enough time, I will definitely take a fork of the source code and continue developing it.
December 28, 20241 yr Now I don't know if the following things are normal: https://any.run/report/652f6d2901c86de4a05743b5f808fafb6e28b9720c39bce5e7e031d26cac9035/0c878a61-100c-4e7e-83f4-73656fa7bef8
December 28, 20241 yr On 12/26/2024 at 12:29 AM, NotHereToPlayGames said: Above post was requested to be deleted while I was testing the reply to that now-deleted post yeh i edited b'coz i thought extended kern was "general purpose" (as i wanted to test a specific app to it) but then i saw it has a list of limited apps it supports ... :/
December 28, 20241 yr 14 hours ago, Taha Amin Ghafuri said: Now I don't know if the following things are normal: https://any.run/report/652f6d2901c86de4a05743b5f808fafb6e28b9720c39bce5e7e031d26cac9035/0c878a61-100c-4e7e-83f4-73656fa7bef8 What's on that link? Care to write or paste here? Thanks.
December 29, 20241 yr On 12/26/2024 at 2:55 AM, NotHereToPlayGames said: You are free to like theirs. Oh WOW! Thanks for your blessings! What should I do without them!?!? I think, many others and I already told you twenty times, create interesting content, there will be no problem to like yours, then. I join @Dixel and @Saxon in their support of your Firefox posts, but those you write on extended kernels topics, not.
December 29, 20241 yr 9 hours ago, D.Draker said: What's on that link? Care to write or paste here? Thanks. app.run is a service that allows you to install suspicious software and determine if it is a virus. The link I posted belongs to address https://github.com/i486/VxKex.
December 29, 20241 yr The fact is the major problem of VxKex is the installer itself, which is flagged by some antivirus software due to its nature of auto-extractible 7z (but not all; for example MS Defender flags it while BitDefender used to flag it several months ago but no longer does (probably because I sent them a false positive report?)). Once installed, a manual scan of each DLL one by one using BitDefender in paranoid mode shows nothing.
December 29, 20241 yr On 12/24/2024 at 3:12 PM, KittyMaster said: I am a guy behind i486 handle and the following repository https://github.com/i486/VxKex "A" guy, as in there are many of you? Or you meant the guy, as in the only one. Thanks.
December 30, 20241 yr On 12/29/2024 at 6:07 AM, AstragonQC said: The fact is the major problem of VxKex is the installer itself, which is flagged by some antivirus software due to its nature of auto-extractible 7z (but not all; for example MS Defender flags it while BitDefender used to flag it several months ago but no longer does (probably because I sent them a false positive report?)). Once installed, a manual scan of each DLL one by one using BitDefender in paranoid mode shows nothing. At this point, honestly, I don't know whom to trust. If the guy says, he's behind it, why not make a portable version so we all could test with much less risk?
December 30, 20241 yr 17 hours ago, Karla Sleutel said: "A" guy, as in there are many of you? Or you meant the guy, as in the only one. Thanks. Looks more like it's the level of his English.
Create an account or sign in to comment