Dibya Posted January 2, 2018 Posted January 2, 2018 (edited) For Some time I am working on a universal VESA Graphics driver with hardware acceleration for XP. It is based on Reactos Source code and some other from Winddk2003 I am trying to add Direct Draw support Please some one can help me. here is initial release of the driver . This Is a generic vesa video driver with full blown Frame Buffer . https://mega.nz/#!cygRBArB!IeSwlKru_A9zqPBIjQfRcZqW_L_jUJ3Naw0fHPhSE1k Warning : This driver in alpha so far from perfect I have grabbed minport directly compiled from Reactos . any one can help me to build that with Winddk2003? I have used frame buffer from Winddk2003 source code . I want to remove VGA min port only just want to keep vbe min port any one can help me customizing inf? how can i add device name like Intel HD 630? planned features :- *DirectDraw support *DirectX9 Support(Generic one for common application) *OpenGl Support(Where can i get opengl icd?) *Power Management (APM) *Brightness Control(Very Essential ) *Improvement to frame buffer for more better performance. *A control panel applet to adjust resolution , brightness etc *Vulkan Api Support (Where to start with ?) *15-bpp support *VESA 3.0 Support *USWC Please help me . I believe this project will be very helpful Edited January 2, 2018 by Dibya 4
jaclaz Posted January 2, 2018 Posted January 2, 2018 4 hours ago, Dibya said: planned features :- Nice features. Maybe a list of "current" features AND a compiled, working, installable, testable *something* with those "current" features will make the project at least Alpha. The .7z file you pointed at seem only part of the source code from MS and from ReactOS (and mixing them is usually not a very good idea when it comes to licensing). jaclaz 1
cc333 Posted January 6, 2018 Posted January 6, 2018 This could be useful for running XP on newer hardware where no XP-native drivers don't exist (newer Kaby Lake or whatever, for instance). Any chance something like this could be made for XP 64-bit? c
Dibya Posted January 6, 2018 Author Posted January 6, 2018 5 hours ago, cc333 said: This could be useful for running XP on newer hardware where no XP-native drivers don't exist (newer Kaby Lake or whatever, for instance). Any chance something like this could be made for XP 64-bit? c I can compile for x64
Kmuland Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 (edited) These are great news Dibya. Currently Using a Bay-Trail M computer with windows 7 because I cannt find drivers for vista or XP. I cannt get XP installed on this machine due to BSOD duirng install.. but vista works perfect and smoother than 7. Only video drivers are missing, so Ill be glad to give a try to your driver when ready. About brightness, yeah it is a must!!! The new LED screens are very brighty and it hurts your eyes Edited January 11, 2018 by Kmuland
burd Posted January 13, 2018 Posted January 13, 2018 On 1/2/2018 at 11:46 AM, Dibya said: For Some time I am working on a universal VESA Graphics driver with hardware acceleration for XP. It is based on Reactos Source code and some other from Winddk2003 I am trying to add Direct Draw support Please some one can help me. here is initial release of the driver . This Is a generic vesa video driver with full blown Frame Buffer . https://mega.nz/#!cygRBArB!IeSwlKru_A9zqPBIjQfRcZqW_L_jUJ3Naw0fHPhSE1k Warning : This driver in alpha so far from perfect I have grabbed minport directly compiled from Reactos . any one can help me to build that with Winddk2003? I have used frame buffer from Winddk2003 source code . I want to remove VGA min port only just want to keep vbe min port any one can help me customizing inf? how can i add device name like Intel HD 630? planned features :- *DirectDraw support *DirectX9 Support(Generic one for common application) *OpenGl Support(Where can i get opengl icd?) *Power Management (APM) *Brightness Control(Very Essential ) *Improvement to frame buffer for more better performance. *A control panel applet to adjust resolution , brightness etc *Vulkan Api Support (Where to start with ?) *15-bpp support *VESA 3.0 Support *USWC Please help me . I believe this project will be very helpful Good Job and good luck,this will be a good thing to have for windows 2k/xp/vista
mahcih03 Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 On 11/01/2018 at 3:47 PM, Kmuland said: These are great news Dibya. Currently Using a Bay-Trail M computer with windows 7 because I cannt find drivers for vista or XP. I cannt get XP installed on this machine due to BSOD duirng install.. but vista works perfect and smoother than 7. Only video drivers are missing, so Ill be glad to give a try to your driver when ready. About brightness, yeah it is a must!!! The new LED screens are very brighty and it hurts your eyes May I know which BSOD error code you are getting during the install?
burd Posted February 9, 2018 Posted February 9, 2018 @Dibya any news on this ? been awaiting some updates regarding it
Methanoid Posted July 16, 2023 Posted July 16, 2023 @Dibya came here via Google hoping for some clever solution... Did you dump project?
Dibya Posted July 17, 2023 Author Posted July 17, 2023 On 7/16/2023 at 3:46 PM, Methanoid said: @Dibya came here via Google hoping for some clever solution... Did you dump project? Unfortunately i did lot of internal studies and i can hopefully say i understand XP's Graphics architecture properly but their something, their future plan for MESA based driver for AMD & Intel GPU/IGPU, but for now use https://bearwindows.zcm.com.au/vbemp.htm
jaclaz Posted July 17, 2023 Posted July 17, 2023 3 hours ago, Dibya said: Unfortunately i did lot of internal studies and i can hopefully say i understand XP's Graphics architecture properly but their something, their future plan for MESA based driver for AMD & Intel GPU/IGPU, but for now use https://bearwindows.zcm.com.au/vbemp.htm I did a lot of internal (and also external) studies of your sentence and (unfortunately) cannot make heads or tails of it. Care to explain in plainer English what you mean? The essence seems to me "There are no news on the project. No progresses I can report, nothing available, not even an early alpha, not any roadmap, let alone an expected release date ", but I may well be wrong. JFYI, after January 2018 a new rule was added, rule #4.e (for the record around November 2019), which may apply to recent posts: https://msfn.org/board/guidelines/ jaclaz
Dibya Posted July 18, 2023 Author Posted July 18, 2023 (edited) 11 hours ago, jaclaz said: I did a lot of internal (and also external) studies of your sentence and (unfortunately) cannot make heads or tails of it. Care to explain in plainer English what you mean? The essence seems to me "There are no news on the project. No progresses I can report, nothing available, not even an early alpha, not any roadmap, let alone an expected release date ", but I may well be wrong. JFYI, after January 2018 a new rule was added, rule #4.e (for the record around November 2019), which may apply to recent posts: https://msfn.org/board/guidelines/ jaclaz Mocking someone's English, Sorry to break it to you sir i am not a native speaker. If you wish to finish it , kindly PM me , i will give the source. VBEMP-NT exist , a similar product, my point is their no point for re engineering wheel so the project moved to full HW accelerated MESA based driver for future. More you can read here https://github.com/JHRobotics/mesa9x As i said their no plan for now, Edited July 18, 2023 by Dibya
j7n Posted July 18, 2023 Posted July 18, 2023 What is the performance of the Bear Windows driver? Is it similar to Windows XP without any driver and very slow? In the standard deviaton list it days that you can't use resolutions higher than 800*600 on either Intel 7/8 or GeForce 5xxx and newer ones, and even less on Intel 845/915, which significantly limits the driver's usefulness with the most common video adapters. I do remember that ATi had a limited DOS memory on the X550, but GeForce 6200 was still good.
jaclaz Posted July 18, 2023 Posted July 18, 2023 Dibya, it is not at all a problem with your English, I am not a native speaker as well (which creates a nice, symmetrical situation), the issue is with the info that you post that are vague, confusing and possibly falsely creating expectations. I am happy that you now understand Xp's graphic architecture, but if you are not going to produce and release anything, it is of little use to anyone else. What has to do someone else's project (seemingly aimed to 9x and virtual machines) with NT/XP with your project? jaclaz
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now