Tripredacus

I was looking solely at the crash report you posted.

tomasz, how long has this been this been a problem for you?

Nuhi has NTLite: https://www.ntlite.com/

Do the icons exist in the path specified in the stack? Ref: https://bugs.mojang.com/browse/MCL-10659 also: https://github.com/coffeenotfound/ModloaderFix-b1.7.3/issues/2

8.23 GB too big for a Dual Layer? Not sure what the overhead size is on those.

I ran into a situation where there seems to be a minimum Windows 10 build required that can boot on a TRX40 board with a Ryzen 3960X. I can't really find any information on what this version requirement is or if it is caused by a missing hotfix or driver. This is also primarily a WinPE concern, however it may also relate to the main OS equivalents themselves. The behaviour is that the PE will do the pre-load, but the activity indicator (spinning dots) do not appear, and the hardware does a hard lock. There is only USB on these boards, and the caps/num/scroll lock doesn't work. It could be that the hardware is not locked but just the USB portion is. I don't have a PCI-E PS/2 card to verify. These do not boot on the Ryzen board: - WinPE 10 (Kernel32.dll version 10.0.14393.0) - Windows Setup for IoT 1607 LTSB - Windows Setup for Windows 10 RTM or 1511 These do boot on the board: - WinPE 10 (Kernel32.dll version 10.0.17763.1) - Windows Setup for IoT 1809 LTSC - Windows Setup for Windows 10 1709 and 1803 These are all either WinPE on USB (although I do have a report that WinPE 10 (10.0.14393.0) via PXE does not work) or the WinPE that is part of the Windows installation DVDs. I have yet to see if a deployed OS version of say 1511 or 1607 will boot.

OK the first things that need to be resolved are the Content Security Policy errors. These are generated when an add-on or feature of the browser is specifically blocking a portion of a page. This can be a script blocker, any rules to block domains or types of scripts. Anything that would block cookies, (possibly XSS) or mixed/outside content, privacy settings, etc. You can look up each error to get a hint of where the problem is. The first one is specifically due to the site using frames, but is using an outdated method. This could be because the browser is blocking this use of frames, the browser is too new for the intended purpose or (more likely) the site developer is not using the appropriate coding for the target browser. OR that the browser is picking up a kludge for a specific browser when it isn't supposed to (aka, a compatibility fix, which may be sent erroneously if you are using a custom user agent). Ref: https://superuser.com/questions/1456787/what-does-this-mean-content-security-policy-directive-frame-src-has-been-de You can expand out the info on those other red lines to get more info. You'd need to research each to see if there is anything that can be done only on the client. There is also likely a lot of errors that are not the cause of the problem, and that a site may work fine with them being present. And also, without a full understanding of the page structure, it would be impossible to know which is worth focusing on and which isn't. Especially if this is a remote page and not something you have code access to. BUT, that is why the Content Security Policy errors should be the priority.

Is it possible to load this page or url or whatever, with the Inspector open? At least Error Console or Network tab (network tab isn't cached, so it needs to be open when the page load starts), it could give some hints as to what is not working properly with the browser.

This is an problem with the upgrade advisor only. The solution seems to be to remove the device from Device Manager and then doing the upgrade. Making sure to not reboot in-between, otherwise Windows will reinstall the driver.

It really comes down to how the software uses the processor. Here's the Ark comparison: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/compare.html?productIds=83359,82765 The memory bandwidth and speed is better on the 1650, but the CPU cache is better on the 2640. The 2640 is also designed to be used in dual-proc boards, hence why it supports QPI and the other one does not (look at the Bus Speed numbers.) In a real world scenario, the program itself may have a determining factor for which of these two CPUs are the ideal choice, however it is also possible that the observable difference may be negligible.

From my understanding, I don't think ECC has anything to do with it. A memory leak is a software fault.

The BBS menu will only show populated volumes. So it is showing Windows Boot Manager because UEFI boot is enabled, and your OS disk is of GPT type. The other drives will not show if they have no media or not valid media present. By valid media, if you have boot control set to flat UEFI or per-device UEFI, they will not appear in the BBS menu. In other words, the firmware (now) knows to not attempt to boot off of devices with no valid boot roms. Boards with this type of detection feature will have a longer POST time due to the system checking the presence of media. As an example, if you had a CD in the drive, you'd hear the drive spin up during POST, rather than just the power check that would happen with older hardware, to determine the boot capabilities.

In theory it sounds simple, but I also have never been able to get routers to talk to each other on the WLAN side, in order to create a wireless bridge between routers to physical clients. It is either the case that these devices were not designed for what I was attempting, or that the stock firmware just didn't support it. You may want to see if your routers have a custom firmware you could use instead, like dd-wrt or the like, that open up all the options on the device. I ended up not going down this road at all, rather I ended up using a DECA network.

The reason why AutoIT EXEs get flagged is that the compiler uses UPX packing and this is what antivirus programs pick up on. So a lot of AutoIt programs will be flagged as malware or a virus just for being compiled. Imagine that some day some antivirus were to detect everything made by the Visual Basic compiler to be malware! https://www.autoitscript.com/wiki/AutoIt_and_Malware

I lost my first Civ V game on domination victory only yesterday. I still never figured out how to denouce anyone. I did really mess up in this match, when I was at war with a civ I split my forces. And the world got too far ahead of me and I couldn't find any barbarians to convert.

It is the Asus H110M-C/CSM: https://www.asus.com/us/Motherboards/H110M-C-CSM/specifications/ According to the manual, both fan headers support PWM.

It depends on the CPU and how you are using it. I have seen the Ryzen fans that look just like that, but a desktop Intel CPU isn't going to come with such a fan. I'm not overclocking nor trying to push the limits on anything. Most of the high-end video settings are not even noticeable to me and if turning things down increases FPS with no discernable change in graphics quality, I'm going to do that. And another thing is cost. The PCs that I build are done as cheap as possible. I mean, the case I'm using I found in the trash, that is just one example. I'll take a look at those fans with the built-in temperature sensor. The fans I have now are the "2 pin" variety, despite the board having 4 pin sockets and 3 or 4 pin connectors, there are only 2 pins on either the front or rear case fan. Only the CPU fan is 3 pin. There was never any real reason for me to even have a front fan, other than the case had one and it seems like a good idea.

Mcinwll, from the picture I posted, there is a front fan that brings air in, this air goes over the two spindle disks (the fan is actually part of the drive enclosure), then goes over the motherboard, then the rear fan sends it out the back. The CPU is in direct line with this design, obviously it is pushing air away from the CPU. The PSU's fan actually faces the CPU as well. Basically you could draw a straight line from the front to the back of the chassis for airflow, with some turbulence happening inside due to CPU, PSU and video card fans. I know the rear (output) fan's speed because it is reported in the BIOS. The front fan (intake) is much faster. I can tell it because it is louder, but also because it is connected directly to the PSU with no controller in-between. You can see a bare view of this chassis type here: https://ru.gecid.com/cases/chenbro_sr20969/ I say "type" because the link is for the SR20969, which has some slight differences, but the fan placement and the drive bay is the same as the SR105. As far as thermostats go with fans, I was under the presumption that the placement of the thermostat in relation to the fan make a difference, it is the reason I am posting the thread. My concern was that if I connected the front fan to the fan header (a header designed for a rear fan) would it be an issue. It sounds to me that a slight negative pressure would be better than a slight positive one. If there is any sort of fan controller I can connect to the PSU and not to the board (or perhaps to the board using an un-used header like the USB3.0 connector) that has its own thermostat, I can connect the front fan to that, in addition add the optional front fan to the bottom section to help out the video card. Note that the video card I have is one of the newer types that does not turn the fans on until it his a low temperature threshhold. It is kind of weird to be looking inside of the machine when it is on and the fans aren't moving.

I just did an upgrade for my gaming computer, and while I thought I had everything figured out ahead of time, one thing I didn't think of was fan headers. My chassis being the Chenbro SR105 has a front fan. The old board had a "front fan" header in addition to case and CPU fan headers. The new board only has a CPU and case fan header. In order to keep the airflow channel intact, I used a molex adapter to connect to the front fan. The problem is that the rear fan is temperature controlled, and is running about 2700 rpm at idle. The front fan is running at (what I imagine) is full speed, or whatever speed is dictated by the molex connector. Would it be better if the rear fan ran at this "full speed" and have the front fan be controlled by the board? My only concern there is that the board is expecting the that header to be connected as an exhaust fan rather than an intake and thus the temperature detection would be incorrect.

Upgrades! (hmm well my last upgrade post is not here, maybe it was one of those that went missing awhile back) I do not have a picture of the old setup, that I can recall. A rundown history, this PC did start with an Intel DH87MC with a Core 2 duo and 8 GB DDR3. The 8 GB turned into 16 GB and the CPU was upgraded to a quad core non-HT. It also had begun life with a compact Radeon of some model I forget. There was some shenanigans recently that I was dealing with. USB Mouse light would turn off, mouse stop working. Changed mouse. New mouse same thing. Changed USB ports, problem went away for a while, came back. OK so replace the board I guess! Since it was just recently I made this decision, and knowing the upcoming time/shipping crunch I had to act fast and not tool around with buying random parts from Ebay or wherver. So I bought a test board, new CPU and new RAM. Old WEI: Returning hardware: - Chenbro SR105 chassis - Thermaltake TR2 500 Gold 80 Plus PSU - LiteOn 128 GB SSD SATA - Seagate 160 GB 7200 RPM SATA - WD Blue 1 TB 7200 RPM SATA - Creative Audigy EAX Advanced HD SB0090 Gold Editon PCI - Sapphire Radeon RX 580 SE 8 GB New WEI: New hardware: - Asus H110M-C/CSM motherboard - Intel Core i7-7700 3.6 GHz CPU - G.Skill AEGIS 32 GB DDR4 RAM Annnnnnd... The Return of the Spaghetti Monster! Fun fact, I didn't know the video card lit up until just now when I went to take the picture.

Vista was fine once SP1 came out and OEMs were selling PC with enough RAM installed.

Maybe @WinClient5270 can help you.

They are counting "Fortune 500" companies in with this 1 billion number. This is revealing because a large company like that would not be having active computers running on Microsoft accounts. They would be running on AD. What is the adoption rate of Azure AD? Is it 50% or less? This 1 billion number must be including systems that run local accounts... unless it is a smokescreen and perhaps this 1 billion is how many MS accounts have ever been signed into an OS, active or not. As with previous marketing numbers like this, I still wonder whether or not it includes sales figures and would include SKUs outside of the typical OS people know such as the IoT products. In any case, this is a "look at us, we are the best" type of article that is aimed at... who exactly? What competitors do they have? Windows 10's #1 competition is actually Windows 7. We know MS doesn't make phones anymore, so Google and Apple competitors don't count.

I've seen this happen on real hardware with Vista up to 8.1 in some circumstances. Usually using images that were built for other hardware or that have a lot of drivers included. I was never really able to determine a fix for it. If you were to look at the setupact.log and (I believe) the setupapi.dev.log you may be able to find some clue, but for me it never really helped.

The programs I immediately find being related to it are trainer and cheat programs for games.