Tomcat76

You'd need at least Outlook 2013. Also, Outlook 2013 and Outlook 2016 require registry edits to force-enable ModernAuth: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/troubleshoot/administration/modern-authentication-configuration From what I read, it also only works over IMAP and you need the auto-account-setup wizard as opposed to the old-style one in Control Panel. An app password is still required for POP3, in which case Outlook 2007 should work too. Edit: someone mentioned it still wouldn't work for them until they allowed Office to update itself.

The question is: will getting the paid version insure that all settings are preserved? I don't mind paying 44.77 Euro Moneys for a 3-year subscription, but not when it has bugs like that. Also, it's unclear to me what will happen if I "forget" to extend the subscription in time. Will the program delete all but the main identity? Will it remove every email account created after the second? +1. I'm curious to see what'll come out of it.

WinXP SP2 and newer have the latest DX 9.0c core built-in. Those cabs are redundant.

Yes, I just came across the announcement on Google's site while searching for email providers that don't enforce OAuth.

I'm in the same boat as BAW30s, using Outlook Express to access my Hotmail account. I'm also using it for my Gmail account for which I had to enable 2FA so I could use app passwords (which took over 6 months to set up because of my insistance to use authentication over a land line so I could use my mobile number for another Gmail account). I already had to switch to webmail for my ISP-provided accounts and those associated with my websites in 2022/2023 as they offered neither app passwords nor an alternative incoming mail server after they disabled basic authentication. I got MS-blocked almost 2 weeks ago, contrary to some here. It wasn't until yesterday, though, that I finally found out what's going on as I didn't receive the notification I was supposed to get. Somebody (can't remember who or where) suggested that, next to the alternate incoming mail server we already had to use (pop-legacy.office365.com), we should also use an app password. So I enabled 2FA and created an app password, but it still wouldn't connect. Another app password didn't do the trick either, nor did changing the incoming mail server to pop.office365.com or the new default outlook.office365.com. Why can't MS support app passwords used in Outlook Express when Gmail can? The most frustrating part is that I changed all my online subscriptions to Hotmail. Maybe I should've used a Gmail account instead, but I don't like how its spam engine works or that they don't fancy mailing lists too much (it's easy to get blacklisted by them). Like BAW30s, I had my eyes set on OE Classic a long time ago already as it looks like OE and supports identities (the paid version does), but the shortcomings outlined in this thread make me hesitate. I will look into the other ones mentioned here.

This post is old, but I wanna answer it in case someone else is wondering. ASP (like PHP) is a server-side scripting language. When you visit an ASP page with your browser, you will only get the HTML output from that ASP page. The Wayback Machine gets the same HTML output when it crawls a website. The query string is not part of the file name. In order to allow you to download these as separate files, the WBM encodes the question mark as well as the special characters in the query string so they can be part of the file name. Renaming them is not an option (the decoded query string can't be part of the file name). Even if you could, that wouldn't allow a link to "splash.asp?page=3" to work, as it requests splash.asp (passing it the parameter "page=3"). Supposing that the WBM also saved "splash.asp" without the fluff, it still wouldn't know what to do with the parameter; you'd need the original document which has all the parameters and variables defined, which nobody can access or read except for the server it originally resided on. The files in your screenshot are nothing more than static HTML files at this point. You really only have one option: 1) give the files a name that's more meaningful to you (without special characters) 2) update the links inside the files

I donated on September 25 by clicking the Donate Now button and following the wizard, and it isn't showing up either. The only difference from previous donations, is that I did it from a different browser (and a different IP address) which triggered a security check from Paypal. I don't care if I'm mentioned anywhere; I'd just like to know if my money was received.

Just to be clear... I'm in no position to allow or disallow anything. The original project was owned by TommyP. I can observe and give comments, as time permits. Also, HFSLIP started out as an updater/slipstreamer for Windows 2000. Support for Windows XP and Server 2003 was added later. While I was on the project, I always made sure every release was compatible with all supported operating systems; I never focused on one OS alone.

This is embarrassing, haha. I installed refined-h264ify on Serpent a couple of weeks ago. Either way, installing it on Mypal seems to fix the playback issues for me. I'm just blocking VP9 and 60fps videos.

No In the first image, the video is playing (at 480p). In the second and third image, the video stopped playing. The video skipped ahead several times during playback. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6JJJyMaIfg

Thanks. I doubt it's relevant, but I'll post my specs just in case... Core i5-650 4GB DDR3 RAM (2x 2GB) Asus GT710-SL-2GD5 2GB video card (nVidia driver version 368.81) onboard VIA audio chip Realtek gigabit LAN

Working with version 68.14.4b for a while now, I was wondering if other people are having problems playing back Youtube videos. I can only play YT videos fluently if I lower the quality to 240p. Anything above that, the video will either: 1) occasionally skip ahead by a couple of seconds 2) suddenly stop buffering as if the connection got lost; the video will continue to play for a little while but then halts, showing a white spinning circle forever 3) (rarely) the picture will freeze for about 10 seconds, but the audio keeps playing; eventually, the picture will catch up again I didn't have this problem using version 68.14.2b (not that I recall). Could this have something to do with the removed functionality? Serpent 52 (if it doesn't freeze up or crash visiting a Youtube video page) plays the same videos fluently at high resolutions.

(duplicate)

I can confirm this to be working. Thanks for digging it up.

I haven't used any tools to measure the speed, but I did notice a significant speed bump compared to Serpent 52 as well, especially on Youtube. Yes. For me, that includes Classic Theme Restorer, Downloads Window and Session Manager. Also, the Open in browser extension doesn't run properly: I get two dialog boxes asking me what to do. In Serpent (which uses an older version) it's only one. To be fair, though, that's Mozilla's doing. They switched to Web Extensions which have much less control over the UI.