Jump to content

mjd79

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    209

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    Poland

 Content Type 

Everything posted by mjd79

  1. mjd79
    Perhaps this is the case with IPs from outside Poland. In any case, on any unmodified browser you don't have to pass the captcha, and even if you do, it succeeds.
  2. mjd79
    Of course, I perform the tests on a completely fresh profile, without changing any flags or settings and without extensions.
  3. mjd79
    The 100% correct solution to the test always ends up blocked, only on modded Chrome. On unmodified versions or on Firefox at the same time the site runs without any verification, so the browser is blocked, not the IP or MAC address.
  4. mjd79
    It doesn't work in both cases...
  5. mjd79
    As for my Chrome 122 (122.0.6261.112), I tested two scenarios. One was changing the kernel32 import DiscardVirtualMemory to VirtualAlloc in chrome.dll and DWrite.dll to one from Windows 10 1511, the browser was then launched with --no-sandbox. The other is to use a custom kernel32 for chrome.dll, to which I can only provide a link on PM, because the author is generally a cracker, it fixes the sandbox, and a custom modified original kernel32.dll using all the virtual memory functions from the wrapper included in Supermium 132 R0 (which fixed the leaks of that memory) for chrome.dll. DWrite also with W10 1511. In my case, the problem is with allegro.pl.
  6. mjd79
    I have a similar problem with ported Chrome 122 on Windows 8.1 with allegro.pl website. I get blocked by by their counterpart of captcha every time. Flags etc don't help. Could you please check what will happen for you? Thanks.
  7. mjd79
    This appears to be a problem with Ublock Origin MV2. I was able to reproduce this problem on Opera versions 95 and 117 with Ublock 1.62, but it works with Adguard MV2 4.4.22.. In any case, it works fine in Firefox with Ublock 1.62, oddly enough.
  8. mjd79
    I'll check it out, but it seems that it will be hard for me to run anything above Chromium 110. D. Draker as far as I know ran Chromium up to version 125. BTW. that FF 137 has the same problem as FF 130+ on XP with One Core API, that is, any codec like VP9 or H264 does not work on YT. Perhaps someone can solve it, if not, I'll wait to see what the OCA developer does about it.
  9. mjd79
    I don't have time for thorough testing, but FF 137 x64 compiled with patches by e3kskoy7wqk https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7 works runs on Vista with the extended kernel dated March 9, 2023. It only requires the api-ms-core-win-synch-l1-2-0.dll library from Windows 10 (I used from compilation 10240) and osver.ini, which in my case looks like this. [C:\Users\(username)\Desktop\firefox-137.0.en-US.win64\firefox\firefox.exe] enabled=1 Win7SuperVerFix=1 MajorVersion=6 MinorVersion=1 BuildNumber=7601 CSDVersion=Service Pack 1 PlatformID=2 Of course type your path to the Firefox file, you can also type [global] instead Without this dll library, the browser crashes when loading with 100% CPU usage, and without osver.ini it won't display any text correctly. Edit: No playback of any videos works.
  10. mjd79
    Ximonite hosted the win32ss site for a long time, so I thought it was safe....
  11. mjd79
    https://ximonite.com/misc/tools/ExportTableTester.exe
  12. mjd79
    You guys misunderstood me lol. I only gave a link to the drivers, and above I wrote about the integration tools. But you are right that it is best to use the Gigabyte tool.
  13. mjd79
    https://superuser.com/questions/80151/how-to-setup-custom-dpi-below-100-on-windows-7
  14. mjd79
    The problem starts with version 127, it looks like chrome.dll is not able to create any process. because after substituting chrome.dll along with the kernel32 wrapper (and nothing more) by cracker who you probably known, D.Draker, from github, the browser starts up. Unfortunately the information that x64dbg gives me at this stage of my knowledge doesn't give me much.
  15. mjd79
    Opera will probably work up to around version 110 (Chromium 125?) with DWrite.dll from Windows 10, replacing DiscardVirtualMemory with VirtualAlloc (or what I also recently discovered, DiscardVirtualMemory is in 8.1 in kernelbase.dll, so you can add by ExportTableTester redirection to this function in kernel32.dll exports and using it for opera_browser.dll e.g. as kernel33.dll) and with --no-sandbox. This is completely pointless due to depriving the browser of security, but for viewing DRM content you can do so. In my case, interestingly enough, DRM works on 8.1 after copying the widvine from Firefox to any compatible browser on Chromium. Does it work without --no-sandbox? If so, the differences are unfortunately much greater than DWrite and DiscardVirtualMemory. The biggest problem of Windows versions lower than 10 is the Set/GetProcessMigitationPolicy functions. 8.0 and 8.1 have them, but their implentation is insufficient for Chromium.
  16. mjd79
    The easiest way for a “regular” user is to use, for example, NTlite trial version or, unfortunately, the undeveloped but free WinToolKit 1.7. Integrate drivers for both items in boot.wim and the selected edition in install.wim. As for the drivers themselves, these should work for example (I successfully installed Windows 7 on a ThinkPad X270 with a 7th generation processor using them) https://download.gigabyte.com/FileList/Driver/mb_driver_intel_usb3_200series_w7.zip
  17. mjd79
    Windows 7's standard AHCI drivers support even the latest laptop and desktop motherboards. I'm assuming you have a problem with a no driver error in the installer, in which case you need to integrate the USB 3.0 drivers
  18. mjd79
    edit: please delete post, I haven't read carefully
  19. mjd79
    Therefore, the usable versions will be x86, Vista makes no sense on this hardware.
  20. mjd79
    For 128 ESR you only need api-ms-win-shcore-scaling-l1-1-1.dll from 8.1 and change minimum Major OS Version and subsystem version in all FF exes. This works up to version 132.0.2. How to do in the case of newer versions I will describe another time, I still have doubts that it is 100% stable.
  21. mjd79
    Original FF 135b8 on 8.0
  22. mjd79
    Try to ad this to registry by .reg file. Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Policies\Google\Chrome] "ExtensionManifestV2Availability"=dword:00000002 On Chrome 131 under Windows 10, I don't even get warnings about the end of support for Ublock and some other MV2. Edit: I checked on CatsXP 132 x64 (5.1.1)on Windows 7 - UBlock works without problems, there are no warnings about the end of its support. WidevineCDM has also been successfully repaired.
  23. mjd79
    Nowadays (and even those 12 years ago) standard electrolytic capacitors are not used on most motherboards, not like as on older boards. The new ones practically never lose capacity.
  24. mjd79
    As if anyone had any doubts about the actual knowledge of this user
  25. mjd79
    Hi. I specifically wrote “Chromium” because it works most likely on any browser based on that engine, of course in enough new versions (I haven't checked below v109). It does not work with W7 - for this, too, I have actually already found a solution - widevine files from firefox (4.10.2830.0) with kernel32.dll wrapper.
×
×
  • Create New...