mjd79

The GTX 960 is still too new graphics card for Windows 2000, even after installing the blackwingcat drivers and extended kernel.

I installed W7 x64 on a Kaby Lake and H110 motherboard with 8GB of RAM (in one module) There was no problem at all. So, either you have a defective RAM bone, or there is a problem with its contact in the slot. Alternatively, you have something misaligned in the BIOS or a corrupted ISO.

last modifications in source on github are from 7th jan...

Such a drive can be exploited if you are at least a little in the subject, control its condition, copy the data to another medium regularly. On top of that, it can't be a complete s*** like Seagate DM. If the model is highly failing, the number of reallocated sectors is more than single digits in RAW, even knowledgeable people should not take risks. To complete laymen and average users, I actually recommend replacing the drive when the drive begins to physically degrade. My record in this regard is using a defective Samsung 160GB for at least 6 years. Of the 145GB of data on it, I managed to recover some 110GB. I completely ignored its condition at the time, and that's how it ended up (hundreds or maybe thousands of bad sectors...).

Not likely, because I helped him with version 1.2.7 myself.

On W8, you need a version with WidevineCdm probably.

.

You're right, because you can download for example warez there.

The highest version possible to run on Windows 7 at the moment is something around 111.0.5535~111.0.5545. Does VxKex run version 110.0.5481?

I wonder if version 115 works for him on Vista's extended kernel. Also, I confirm that version 115 works on 8.1.

It looks like the March 6 version is currently better, with userenv redirects in the older version for some applications.

For me, 8.1 is similarly fast to 7, but slower than 8.0.

He is probably talking about hex code, from the code what he would get from IDA would not build a browser.

I know

I wonder how many years (or maybe decades) will pass before VxKex actually makes it possible to at least run Chromium 110+. Already Vista x64 with extended kernel is now a much better option (although unfortunately not on my second computer) You have a like from me, because I 100% agree with you, I already prefer spying by big corporations than by some individual programmer, because it can have worse consequences.

Install FF 102 ESR, Opera is heavy and will load your computer at startup.

Perhaps @NotHereToPlayGames will do something about it in the future, because he already has experience in this

They simply forgot to add the appropriate information.

Link not working... Means works, but you have to copy it

BTW SetProcessMitigationPolicy -> SetProcessAffinityMask GetProcessMitigationPolicy -> GetProcessAffinityMask SetThreadInformation -> SetThreadAffinityMask PrefetchVirtualMemory -> VirtualAlloc All missing imports from userenv.dll -> CreateEnvironmentBlock or DestroyEnvironmentBlock. This is enough to run Chromium 110 without sandbox on Windows 7.

Redirect locally the userenv.dll and kernel32.dl files from the March 6 version.

Some applications don't work as they should, because the WOW64 subsystem was not yet perfected.

I recently came up with the idea of building a Windows 98 SE computer from parts I have. I'd like to use 1GB of DDR2 RAM (I can allocate 256MB for the integrated graphics card if that's a problem), a Gigabyte GA-EG41MF-US2H or Asus P5G41C-M LX motherboard, an integrated graphics chip and an Intel Pentium Dual Core E2140 1.6GHz processor. Am I able to find the necessary drivers for such a setup? Thanks for the answers.

Hi. I would like to install Vista x64 with extended kernel on the laptop whose model is in the topic. However, from what I remember, on these chipsets USB 3.0 will work as 2.0. Have any modified drivers or something like that been created? Thanks.

Unfortunately, these versions do not work. But 1.16/1.17 should.