Jump to content

Anbima

Member
  • Posts

    289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Germany

Everything posted by Anbima

  1. Great that you're continuing. In the new version, please make the rebased chrome.dll optional. Optimally, please offer both variants for DL.
  2. Perfect. Will you also do the fix for the WebP problem?
  3. @feodor2Do you already know when you will release a new version? I make a german language pack and this should be for the new version.
  4. I get the following header: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/apng,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.9 and on the following page the webP images are displayed: https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1?hl=en
  5. What would be the easiest way to do this?
  6. Is it possible to disable this in 360Chrome perhaps also by means of a switch or flags at startup?
  7. I have added the following to my filter in uBlock: *.webp With this all webp images should not be displayed. Does this fix the problem?
  8. For me, Kaspersky AV now quits. Which antivirus would you recommend for XP? What is the new one you wrote about? I would have to renew Kaspersky otherwise.
  9. Are you off Windows XP now or are you using a different browser?
  10. Here's how it works: [Functions] <existing lines> FileDelete=%Profile%\Default\Cookies FileCopy=%Profile%\Default\Cookies_org|%Profile%\Default\Cookies Cookies_org is in the same folder.
  11. Can a file also be copied and deleted in the 360Loader.ini? I could make myself a "master" file "cookies" and then always copy this at startup. For example at [RunAfter] Copy Chrome\User Data\DefaultCookies.org > Chrome\User Data\DefaultCookies Would this work? If so, how?
  12. And without extensions? I don't necessarily want to use additional memory.
  13. I have set cookies to be deleted on exit. Can I set that the cookies from certain domains are not deleted?
  14. With 1030 I have no delay at all. Click and the page is there. In 1030 I now have isolation flag enable and there is no delay.
  15. I have now used the (non-rebased) chrome.dll from 1030 in 2036 for testing. It runs, but it also has the delay.
  16. Can you please look? I think that for many, faster access is more important than a bit more memory. On 1030 I also use the non-rebased and all the errors I had with other programs are gone.
  17. Can you send me the "not rebased" chrome.dll from the 2036?
  18. Do you have any idea why there is a delay in accessing web pages or settings with the 2036? Is this perhaps also a setting? Or maybe something is missing in the download? I have re-downloaded and "installed" the 2036 (ungoogeled). It is always the same problem. With 1030 it is not.
  19. This does not exist in my case. Can this be the reason why the browser uses low CPU power?
  20. With 2036 I have an intermittent delay when opening a web page (also when opening the settings). I have tested it several times with the 1030 alternating with the 2036 and it is only with the 2036. Can anyone confirm this?
  21. 2036 has more processes with the same open tabs and requires more memory. Processes with 1030: Processes with 2036:
  22. Is there a difference in polyfills between 13.5.2036 and 13.5.1030? Can 2036 do more than 1030? Which polyfills are important now? Maybe these can be listed again in one post so that these can be easily inserted into Tampermonkey.
×
×
  • Create New...