Jump to content

Dixel

Member
  • Posts

    1,819
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    115
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Netherlands

Everything posted by Dixel

  1. I posted better screenshots with the latest version of supermium, no changes.
  2. I don't have Win10, but the difference in fonts is obvious, not in favour of Supermium. I'm not saying Supermium is bad, no. It's just very fatiguing to use it for a long time. Compare "Get help with Catsxp" with "Get help with Supermium" on the screenshot.
  3. Yep, the same for me, though it's closer to 15%. Brave vs. Supermium 118.
  4. Reading Italian is not one of my strongest abilities, but I'm pretty sure by "disco" they didn't mean the music style. Memoria or disco wording means they suspect your HDD or RAM be at fault, which could also point to the PAE patch. PAE patch doesn't get friendly with Nvidia drivers, the combination of PAE+Nvidia drivers don't go well with network drivers.
  5. I had that particular BSOD error "d0000144 unknown hard error" in the past (circa 2012-2013), for me it was the system HDD failing. https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/d0000144-unknown-hard-error/9e883793-46b5-475f-9edd-057b909be3ac https://www.dell.com/community/en/conversations/desktops-general-read-only/stop-d0000144-unknown-hard-error/647e425af4ccf8a8ded15746 https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/stop-d0000144-unknown-hard-error.17994653/
  6. I'd want to see full portability, like they achieved in the ungoogled version, I'll then write a new loader app.
  7. Strange it says it's running on Win10, people on his github page wrote Supermium shows your true OS.
  8. Absolutely agree, indeed a good browser. I trust it and even use it for banking, Made in Germany.
  9. Thank you, thank , thank you jaclaz! Facts, independent and unbiased statements is what we really need. I shall make sure to upvote your post as soon as the new drastic "timing" limit will be regenerated (reset) for the new day.
  10. It's not relevant to the windows XP version, even if we are to somehow assume it might be true.
  11. @NotHereToPlayGames, wait a minute! You're deviating from the course! You were going to also remove "telemetry" to force us to use it, we "MUST", lol. OK, when shall we be seeing the patched version? Enlighten us, please.
  12. Are you sure you wanna do this? 'Cause it would then automatically exclude @Vistapocalypse from all discussions of any OS and any software, except iOS and iOS apps he uses.
  13. Any, and by any I mean any, AV has a built-in self protection, self preservation mechanism from malicious attempts of breaking it, but I don't have to tell you that, do I? So, maybe also try to compare the modified (even slightly, even one bit) versions of them both, to see how they will behave?
  14. Seeing you're strangely persistent with that whole idea, I'm starting to have doubts you know what you're going to face. Modding an AV would require advanced reverse engineering skills, since what you're offering is exactly what any AV would need to protect itself from (hacking)*. Now, I don't know about your personal skills, but I hope you'll manage! It would be interesting to see the result. *EDIT - And yes it also includes protecting its registry entries.
  15. You can't do that, it's against EULA to modify and remove parts of the programme, I already explained it. Also, I'm pretty sure it's against other Russian laws. Find an English EULA where they explicitly allow you to do that, also you need their approval to publish their modded programme at public places such as MSFN.
  16. It would then be a modded software, and this topic includes only the original versions, Fair would be to have a banner with a warning, smth like: Custom modified AV, self-proclaimed to be secure. And I'm pretty sure it's against their EULA, so you can be sued for modding the code. It's a friendly advice on how not to get into trouble with the law.
  17. I too have this question! It seems odd. First they write they stay on older OS to be less spied on, second they port the standard Chrome/chromium, really odd.
  18. And what if people just want to block it due to the crappy quality? "I hate webp with every fiber of my being......" "it's F...ing everywhere now. and they look like crap. id*** putting up low res webp's and just dynamicly upscaling them to fit. And it look sh*t. Blurry as hell, smudged... People have even begun using them in renpy games or rpgm, or any other game they are able to get it to work in." "It's just bad, even colours look a little off in them" https://www.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/btblqh/how_do_i_disable_webp/
  19. New "merchandise API" block https://msfn.org/board/topic/184249-chrome-110-based-opera-i-ported-it-to-vista/?do=findComment&comment=1249504
  20. In this a case, maybe try to make it shorter? If you patched the header with new method, can also test it here. https://swifttls.org/ My result below.
  21. No, I meant it's served highly compressed, not lossless. That's the whole idea behind the usage of webp, to save the bandwidth, and to hell with the quality.
×
×
  • Create New...