Jump to content

NotHereToPlayGames

Member
  • Posts

    6,754
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    84
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames

  1. Dell XPS 8700. i7-4770. 16GB RAM. Five monitors, do not know all GPUs from memory. Supermium is the only browser that does this! Both on host Win10, host XP x64, and on guest XP x86 in VirtualBox 4.3.40. I have to hold the power button for 10 seconds and force a power-off !!! Each and every time I trial-run Supermium. No offense, fingers crossed on future versions, but I downright refuse to put my host OS through another one of these forced-power-off's.
  2. Jeer as in "I want to jeer at the word beer"
  3. That is in VMware. I am using VirtualBox. I've also confirmed that I ran 4.3.28 when my host is XP, but I run 4.3.40 in Win10 so my Supermium tests is with a FULLY-UPDATED non-hacked XP SP3 (no POSReady) in VirtualBox 4.3.40 running from a Win10 host.
  4. I am running version 4.3 but forget offhand which "Y" version of 4.3.Y Granted, I was on 4.3.Y intentionally not updating when I was running XP. Now that I'm on Win10, maybe, just MAYBE, it might be time to upgrade, lol.
  5. XP SP3 with *all* of the "real" updates. I do NOT use POSReady "hacks".
  6. You misunderstood. Or I should have written a descriptive paragraph instead of a KISS Principle. My comment on the portable not working was NOT the Portable Supermium. It was in regards to a the Process Tamer app discussed just prior to my post.
  7. Process Tamer helps but Supermium is still a NIGHTMARE on my system! An absolute and utter NIGHTMARE! I open a web page and have to wait 24 to 43 seconds before the scroll wheel will scroll the page. Then when it does scroll, I have to wait 7 to 18 seconds for the scrolled-into portion of the page to be displayed. An absolute and utter NIGHTMARE. Yes!!! This test was in a VirtualBox VM of XP SP3 with 3GB RAM - I refuse to attempt Supermium on my host until the next release!
  8. Installer version is working. Seems to only be the "portable" version that does not work.
  9. There are several polyfills for Mozilla's lacking link preload. I've not tried any of them. Just a few - https://github.com/jonathantneal/preloadfill/blob/master/package.json https://github.com/digitalkaoz/preload-polyfill https://github.com/aFarkas/link-preload
  10. Jeff Dunham
  11. Definitely not just you. I used to see that problem all over the place when I was on NM28. Too many folks tend to think that javascript is the problem that makes modern sites no longer "work" on older browsers. But that problem has nothing to do with javascript, it's a css issue and it happens a LOT with NM28 on web sites that have a "navigation banner" with dropdown menus.
  12. Lucky you! I get that shift in EVERYTING newer than v86 that works in XP. Chromium ESR, CatsXP, Supermium, Thorium. They ALL do that shift on my system. So at least I guess they're all "consistent". Maybe they're all CLONING each other? waka waka waka
  13. Speaking of Chase and always feeling like a dog "chasing" its own tail, I was recently "forced" to upgrade from XP to Win10 because my checking account could no longer be polyfilled or Proxomitron'd to "working" in XP. That was some time over a month but less than two months ago. I'm wondering if there was enough "backlash" because I just noticed today that my checking account is once again accessible in XP using 360Chrome! While that is good news, I admit that I am now a bit reluctant to return to XP - because that forced upgrade WILL happen again. Two months from now, two years from now, who knows when.
  14. Are you referring to this?
  15. Why? Unless their server serves .webp, then why would they care if your browser has that "so-called" security hole fixed or not. WepP is over-exaggerated, doesn't really "effect" folks anywhere near as much as the HYPE AND PROPAGANDA suggests.
  16. Oh, I pretty much guarantee that the answer to that, worded that way, is "nothing". Rather, v114 *plus* v115 brought a SO-CALLED "security fix" that Chase just "has to have".
  17. Not in the slightest. I do everything on a desktop PC, I've never owned anything Android-driven.
  18. As far as that goes, Tampermonkey could also blanket-replace any-and-all libre franklin font-family as it seems this is what is disliked at Digital Spy.
  19. Stylus with the below works, but it seems odd that a "specific" instead of a "global" is required - body, body *, body h1, body h2, body h3, body h4, body h5, body h6, .MessageList .PageTitle>h1 {font-family: unset !important;}
  20. You'll need a Proxomitron fix or a Tampermonkey fix instead of using Stylus. For Tampermonkey, this works - https://github.com/RedwolfPrograms/userscripts/raw/main/custom-fonts.user.js
  21. That was recommended by others also. It has ZERO effect on my system. No clue whether it "should" or not, just know that it has ZERO effect, no decrease in startup time, but no increase either.
  22. On my XP x64, rebasing 360Chrome .dll's actually MADE MY FIRST LAUNCH TIME WORSE. So I actually NEVER rebase my .dll's!
  23. Rebasing .dll's will NOT prevent that "first launch" startup delay. I have ALWAYS had this delay! ALWAYS. Even in 360Chrome on XP. Even in Ungoogled Chromium on Win10.
  24. Official Ungoogled Chromium will still have that settings page but the sync, sign-in, and URL telemetry options are removed completely. Official Ungoogled still offers - 1) "Improve search suggestions" (this is technically only a "Google" thing if your default search engine is Google and you "want" the so-called search "suggestions") 2) profile name, color, and avatar 3) import bookmarks and settings
×
×
  • Create New...