Jump to content

NotHereToPlayGames

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,852

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    87

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    United States

 Content Type 

Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames

  1. NotHereToPlayGames
    Back when I used software-firewall versus hardware-firewall, Comodo was my favorite by far. But I intentionally stopped upgrading beyond Comodo Personal Firewall 2.4.18.184. Strictly speaking of my "ancient" XP machines.
  2. NotHereToPlayGames
    Agreed. I do applaud the discussion of alternatives. One size will never fit all. Currently, my Intel Atom (single core) and my Intel Core 2 Quad (4 cores, "unthreaded") computers perform best with uBO v1.26.2 for everything that I have tried on them. With identical lists however, my Core i7 (4 cores, 8 threads) would leak YouTube ads! My Core i7 computers are currently using AdNauseam v3.21.4 (forked from uBO) and have yet to ever leak an ad on YouTube. Despite AdNauseam being my best performer on my Core i7 (not even so much as a split-second visual "flash" of the ad being blocked!), when I run the same exact extension with the same exact lists on my Core 2 Quad, it will not block any YouTube ads! Both running Win10 Ungoogled Chromium v94. But uBO will show a split-second visual "flash" of the ad being blocked. One size will never fit all.
  3. NotHereToPlayGames
    Agreed, same here. There is no "need" in Win 10.
  4. NotHereToPlayGames
    Please advise if you did this in XP or 10. Thanks.
  5. NotHereToPlayGames
    No, I didn't. Like somebody else alluded to, it seems you are seeking strife where none exists. I'll take guidance from that other person and conclude this discussion herein.
  6. NotHereToPlayGames
    My 13.5.1030 Redux is dated November 2023. I was XP and XP Only way back then. (Well, not at work, but XP and XP *ONLY* at home.) It was only "months" ago that I switched from XP to 10 (at home). But my Acer Aspire One is still on XP at home (but I use Serpent 52 on it).
  7. NotHereToPlayGames
    They were not blacklisting "older browsers" or faking a Chromium v77 would have not worked. They were, seemingly, blacklisting v86 and nothing more than that. Of course, I'm not about to try a hundred different user agents just to find out "exactly" what they are doing, lol.
  8. NotHereToPlayGames
    That is likely not the tell-tale error. What other errors are in the console? Fix them and this 500ah is likely fixed as a result.
  9. NotHereToPlayGames
    Wrong. Their is no Client Hints in 360Chrome v13.5. And Win10 doesn't change that fact. At least, not in my releases. Do not recall if they existed "upstream".
  10. NotHereToPlayGames
  11. NotHereToPlayGames
    Did you intend to link to an ht-tp instead of to an ht-tpS? Other than that, it would not load for me in my default setup for v13.5.1030 either. But DOES LOAD when I use my default alternate UA - which is Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/77.0.3865.120 Safari/537.36 Generally speaking, whenever I bump into a site that does not work (and if I remember to change the UA at all!), I DROP TO AN EVEN OLDER v77 THAN TO TRY "NEWER" OR "MOST RECENT" UAs. And that works in this case too, the site LOADS WITH A V77 UA.
  12. NotHereToPlayGames
    ps - I may be able to narrow it down more precisely. The July 2023 version simply always worked for Restore Session. I have only recently upgraded from July 2023 (due to Promise.allSettled discussions herein).
  13. NotHereToPlayGames
    @roytam1 Somewhere between the July 31, 2023 version of Serpent 52 and the July 4, 2024 version of Serpent 52, the Restore Session tab does not seem to work. Sometimes it will never show up and the last session is restored without this tab. Sometimes it will show up but the table will not be populated with the windows or tabs that are to be restored (such as the below screencap). Sometimes it will work correctly and does display the windows or tabs being restored.
  14. NotHereToPlayGames
    .rar files in general used to be considered suspicious just for being .rar
  15. NotHereToPlayGames
    My interpretation - there were 2 million FALSE POSITIVE signatures! I say that in complete seriousness! I speak solely from a corporate perspective. I have NEVER witnessed a non-false positive, I have witnessed HUNDREDS of FALSE POSITIVES. Heck, we had one even here at MSFN on the Supermium thread a short while back.
  16. NotHereToPlayGames
    I actually used a Serpent 52 version from July 2023 because very often times, the older versions are indeed FASTER. So yeah, I've had to update to July 2024 also. I've not actually bumped into the Promise.allSettled until this hotline.ua was cited.
  17. NotHereToPlayGames
    As far as the Promise.allSettled function error, this was always a Serpent error on older versions (edit: strictly in reference to cited hotline.ua) but was resolved in January of this year. Resolved with this release:
  18. NotHereToPlayGames
    Control Panel - yes. And I did recognize it. MToolBox - no. And nobody here recognized it.
  19. NotHereToPlayGames
    No worries, lol. Personally, I wish we could flatout BAN non-English screencaps! They help NO ONE.
  20. NotHereToPlayGames
    I believe he already cited your answer:
  21. NotHereToPlayGames
    "fierce violin" -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmFVxOb5pKo
  22. NotHereToPlayGames
    Ok. I guess I shall become a GitHub member and "report" both projects. Admit in my "report" that I don't know who is right or who is wrong. Only that I suspect the moderators of GitHub would like to know about possible Intellectual Property Theft occuring on their repositories. Would that put an end to whatever-we-call-this?
  23. NotHereToPlayGames
    Fair enough. But I really really really FAIL to see why it has become a DEFENSIVE STANCE. Are these not OPEN SOURCE GITHUB COMMITS? I do not have a GitHub account and, admittedly, "could care less" who borrowed from whom. I myself have seen DOZENS of "my" 360Chrome mods borrowed by various members/countries/websites - don't care, I actually find it as more of a pat on the back that "my" work made it into other people's projects. It's also quite cool and a pat on the back when I see my XP-themed mods make it into YouTube videos - don't care that these videos don't even cite MSFN as where they obtained their XP-themed 360Chrome. These were over a year ago, but I'm sure they are still out there - don't care if they are or are not. Now then, having said that, if I made money on these mods, then yeah, it would be a different story. I guess my only takeaway is this - if you feel "win32" would be equally defensive, then shouldn't this "argument" be at GITHUB instead of here at MSFN? I mean, aren't BOTH of these projects hosted at GITHUB? If terms of service agreements were violated, then there are proper channels to go through to get one or both of these projects removed.
  24. NotHereToPlayGames
    You seem to be ignoring this part of his post. Your interpretation still seems quite "defensive" and "retaliatory". Almost as if you WANT this to be YOUR fight. Chromium commits are PUBLIC DOMAIN. I don't have the time or energy to engage further. Not my fight.
  25. NotHereToPlayGames
    Where is that post? I may have missed that one. I was referring to speed optimization discussions and things went "sideways" in this thread very fast. So I shall leave it simply at this - "not my fight", lol. Where's my popcorn?
×
×
  • Create New...