Destro

ok it isn't helpful. Good luck.

We can't blame the CPU. Opening Chrome settings is enough to trigger this behavior and after waiting forever it doesn't resolve itself. Freezing the compupter. Thats not normal.

Unfortunatly the moment I try to do anything such as open settings in this browser running XP one of the chrome processes in its tree pegs my cpu to 98% making it unusable. I can kill it and chrom will continue to run but if i try anything it comes back.

Does anyone have an archive of this? Or am I beating a dead horse.

latest mypal on XP SP3, with GTX 960 latest driver, BSOD on youtube with hardware acceleration enabled on my system. Not sure if this is helpful. ================================================== Dump File : Mini061423-01.dmp Crash Time : 6/14/2023 10:16:27 PM Bug Check String : KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED Bug Check Code : 0x1000008e Parameter 1 : 0xc0000005 Parameter 2 : 0xbf84ad8a Parameter 3 : 0xb333ea74 Parameter 4 : 0x00000000 Caused By Driver : win32k.sys Caused By Address : win32k.sys+4ad8a File Description : Multi-User Win32 Driver Product Name : Microsoft® Windows® Operating System Company : Microsoft Corporation File Version : 5.1.2600.7684 (xpsp_sp3_qfe_escrow.190320-1710) Processor : 32-bit Crash Address : win32k.sys+4ad8a Stack Address 1 : win32k.sys+4ae5e Stack Address 2 : win32k.sys+10d70 Stack Address 3 : win32k.sys+1116f Computer Name : Full Path : C:\WINDOWS\Minidump\Mini061423-01.dmp Processors Count : 4 Major Version : 15 Minor Version : 2600 Dump File Size : 90,112 Dump File Time : 6/14/2023 10:17:06 PM ================================================== ================================================== Filename : ntoskrnl.exe Address In Stack : ntoskrnl.exe+32e67cf0 From Address : 0x804d7000 To Address : 0x806e5000 Size : 0x0020e000 Time Stamp : 0x5b994292 Time String : 9/12/2018 12:45:06 PM Product Name : Microsoft® Windows® Operating System File Description : NT Kernel & System File Version : 5.1.2600.7649 (xpsp_sp3_qfe.190108-0655) Company : Microsoft Corporation Full Path : C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntoskrnl.exe ==================================================

So I tried it and its very cool, my only gripe is that it was using a lot of CPU like 10% or somthing on a Thinkpad T61P . If there was some lightwieght version I would consider using it.

I have this ongoing issue with all the 360 browsers I've tried and the download manager not clearing the file history properly. It could be user error I guess. Does anyone know which files I need to delete to get rid of these orphaned recently downloaded files that wont delete and keep coming back afterwards.

so what are the prereqs to run on xp.

13 works great thanks for your effort. 11 works way better for youtube.

which roytam browser is least laggy. The ones I've tested just chug even on moderately powerful enough hardware.

If you want to just play games that run on it, its perfectly usable forever as long as theres hardware availible to run on.

I might try this. Thx for sharing. I also looked for another solution same as you being unsatisfied and came to my own conclusion that Real VNC enterprise worked better than anything else I tired. 4.4 and I beleive 4.5 client is working on 98se. The mirror Driver installed on the server it runs smooth like hot butter. You get all the copy and paste functionality and I can just use whatever browser I want to on the server with zero compatibility issues. It's quite a bit better than using RDP normally, though I realize your way of doing it is not. All other ways of doing things, I lose a lot of modern functionality.

it's a fun upgrade. It doesn't make my games run any better though. I don't like the fact that I need GDI updates, explorer updates etc to use it. if it could of just ran on vanillia windows with no updates and have full functionaty it would of been a better program. I get that it can run, but you dosen't fully work with all features.

it is possible to install tablet PC components on any pc running any version of 32bit XP, but I have never tried to install them on 2003 server x64/XPx64. Theres a chance it could work becasue some of it runs on .net 1.0, then again the way Tablet input works on XP might be incompatibile. I probably wont test it because I can't think of a valid reason to try it.

is there any usecase scenario for still running flash. i haven't run into any lately.