Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by jcarle
-
Setting only the cursor speed may not be enough. Try raising the acceleration value as well.
-
I never believe it when I read posts like this. Why do people even bother?
-
CON is a reserved system name. You cannot name folders using reserved system names which also includes LPT1 (2, 3... etc) and COM1 (2, 3... etc).
-
To make a torrent, you need software. Most torrent clients can make a torrent file. Personally, I use uTorrent to make my torrents. As for trackers, it's usually best to use the tracker from a known website. Otherwise, you have to run your own tracker. There are some site-less trackers available that you can run from your own computer, uTorrent has a built in tracker. Otherwise, you need to install a tracker with website software combo onto a server. As for seeding, you are usually the first seed since you're the one creating the torrent. You need the source files to create the torrent in the first place anyways. Unless you create the torrent using your source files and you know someone who has an identical copy of those files, they can seed for you.
-
I think it's pretty much a choice you have to make. Unattended or repair. I don't believe you can have both.
-
Yes, Deep Freeze is also used by some departments on campus here. From what I hear they're very happy with it. Deep Freeze will preserve the original state of the machine and prevent tampering with the original installation but it will not allow him to "lock down" the machine and prevent people from copying "illegal materials".
-
No one mentioned fun? Damnit, we do it because it's fun!
-
You should read this: http://www.osronline.com/ddkx/ddtools/bccodes_3e07.htm
-
That's got to be one of the more unique bugs I've heard of so far (not limited to just this game, I mean all around).
-
If you make a UL for windows 98 you can point the download path to your hosting. I'd be happy to add windows 98 to our list of ULs.
-
pinging each card's IP (and not the loopback) would achieve the same result
-
Pinging a computer name resolves the IP but gets no replys
jcarle replied to ixy's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
Are you on the correct subnet? -
You can lock down the computers using Group Policies as well.
-
Standard television has a resolution of 480 interlaced visible scanlines. Therefore setting your videocard to 640x480 output to your television will yield optimal output. The rest is just a matter of tweaking with your video card's drivers.
-
The symptoms you describe are indicative of a hard drive which is failing. As for DDR ram, I'm sure you can get a used stick for cheap by going to a small computer store where you live.
-
If you Googled for your answer, you would quickly read the following for KB931836... "This update supersedes and replaces update 928388, released in November 2006.". Please take the time to do a little research before posting.
-
I believe it is the ntoskrnl. I think it's the same image that's used for the usual boot screen.
-
To further what Sonic said, since you have a laptop, what you'll need is something like this: http://www.cooldrives.com/software-dongle-lpt-pcmcia.html
-
Disputed points? You didn't even make any valid points. As for your storage implementations, I doubt that. None the less, I'm going to illustrate the vast differences below. To start, the ATA standard is out-dated. The standard was established in 1986 and was simply revised over and over again to try to keep up to date. The last revision was in 2001 which is 6 years ago. The SATA standard was established in 2003. It's fairly obvious that a standard created within the last 4 years is going to be much more capable and much more adaptable to modern needs then one made over 20 years ago. The ATA standard has not been revised since 2001 because it is impossible, at this time, using that standard, to exceed the limitations of 133MB/s. The limitations are due to signal timings, electromagnetic interference and data integrity. Something that simply cannot be fixed with a revision of the standard. As modern data throughput increases, ATA simply cannot keep up without creating bottlenecks. ATA being parallel in nature is also limited to 16-bit. SATA does not have this limitation as it uses 1-bit data signaling. There is the obvious advantages of smaller cables being used for SATA. Although an single IDE cable can be used to connect two IDE devices, two SATA cables are still smaller then a single IDE cable. There is also a difference in the supported length for each standard's cables. ATA can sustain IDE cables up to 18 inches. SATA can sustain up to 40 inch cables. Data transmission power consumption is also reduced. ATA uses sixteen 5V data signals, SATA uses a single 250mV data signal. ATA is not hot-swappable without special hardware. SATA is hot-swappable. ATA cannot exceed 133MB/s burst transfer rates. SATA can sustain up to 300MB/s continuous transfer rates. SATA supports better power management as SATA devices can use 3.3V as well as the typical 12V and 5V found in ATA devices. SATA natively supports AHCI which ATA cannot support. SATA supports NCQ, ATA does not. And by the way, your only argument for ATA, the one about error correction is false. SATA uses CRC error correction to verify data packets, the same method that ATA uses. SATA takes a step up above ATA though since not only does it verify data packets like ATA does, it also uses CRC data verification on command and status packets, which ATA does not do. There is simply no reason not to choose SATA over ATA, unless the person is, like yourself, completely misinformed.
-
Get yourself a decent 500W (or so) Seasonic power supply. It will do the job just fine.
-
Try installing Firefox and see if it acts normal, if it does, chances are your Internet Explorer installation is fried.
-
I'm thinking there's something in the way nLite is integrating the lastest RyanVM update pack that's causing setup to crash.
-
First, don't double post. Second, that simply isn't the case. I, for one, use a legitimate Windows XP professional and I experience the same issue. Your accusations are simply unfounded.
-
I too can confirm this.