vinifera

is there a way via registry to remove every folder inside User folder (contacts, downloads, links.... and so on) except My Documents ?

in hope I'm not too annoying... may I ask what version should be best used of rt7 just to trimm the size of install the 1.7 or 2.6 ?

damnnit seems not... I get this screen and attached my settings if anyone can figure out why I get what I get...7SP1.ini

simple question, can vlite also edit win7 SP1 ?

can you elaborate as what kind of risks ?

got small question I've read when people customized win7 ISO with RT7 on winXP that installations later fail, so it was said this modifications must be made on host using win7 but what if I have XP, and put win7 in vmware and edit it in there ? would It still result in failure or is it ok that way ?

@Tripredacus nope, just regular .msstyle also if its tooltip color problem then I guess it came with theme OP is using, this can be only changed via msstyle itself StyleBuilder has easy access to system colors

virtual dub with plugins for flv and mp4 (so it can load them) then just choose from video compression to whatever codec type you want encode

if SxS could be removed without fatal bugs, that would be the only thing "needed" for win7 to be light rest is just page file size

don't use tweakui so don't know there but under appearance options it should be "Selected Items" if there is such option then that is it unless I misunderstood the problem

but below download link it says bolded: Note: WAIK is needed only for Windows Vista and Server 2008 platform thats why I asked :/

I have 2 questions if I may... 1. on their page for requirements they a** WAIK for 7, but also write only vista needs this so does it mean that users of win7 don't need this to be installed at all ? 2. is it true that RTlite will only work if I use it under win7 ?

for some reason lately this site is unreachable for me even through proxy is the page itself down or ???

granted I used nlited yumeyao addon for IE8 but I guess this happens even with normall install my IE has +SH attributes set and even under admin account I can't remove them CMD gives error: "not reseting system file" whenever I try -s or -h question: why is it set like that at all ?

ah nice cutting did the job thanks guys

hello I need a help from... well those who are good in these kind of things I have bunch of .RSF files they are taken out of old Microsoft Windows Longhorn system files (extracted resource) my thinking is that they are some sort of images, this will tell you why: problem is renaming them to PNG does nothing also by googling (specificaly for MS OS - Longhorn) I only came acros 1 article saying those were mislabeled RSS files, but as you see from picture it looks nothing like RSS, in fact they have nothing incomonn with XML or they are encrypted ? heres link to 1 file for analysis http://www.mediafire.com/?rayi4vrmc3rp1p1 anyone have idea how to "convert" them to image or extract it out ? or what the heck they might be ?

aah that is then different story hehe ok thanks for clarifying that out to me

yes that one reg entry been digging on google few sites, some of them say that XP by default has max value of 500 I set it up to 2048 value I'll delete db's then and report back, but still it smells bad

am I the only one who thinks .net became uber huge bloat ? It basicaly exceeds XP setup size

I have increased in registry size for icon cache db to 2 MB but I see that it grew beyond that the Admin (default account) - which I don't use, has db of 2.6 MB and my account has 8.2 MB size is this.. bug or normal ? I'm not experiencing any Icon corruption yet but shouldn't reg setting limit its size ?

Asian languages could been removed (yes i know you wrote untouched), they take space also all folders except i386 removed (which ordinary user won't notice unless browsing CD) remove about 90MB I've made for myself also XP SP3 + all updates till 2011 untouched, and its also ~600 MB maybe little less so its not something mystical

lol who even wants to use that piece of crap anyway... as for XP support, yes the official one stops in 2014, which doesn't mean people will gonna drop using this OS the very same day MS stops patching it... but the way MS goes with winblows... I think i'll switch on Linux later as anything post Server2003 is just crap an excuse to buy expencive rig's just to be capable of running their fancy OS in which user has absolutely NO control over it

ok I will finaly be ready tonight to start with this "project" but I must ask some hotfixes still come with older number but with "v2" so as I understand they were updated recently but still hold old numbering so what happens when I start integrating them and I get KB103 (old, year 2009) KB104 (old, year 2009) KB106-v2 (updated in year 2010) KB109(old, year 2009) do these hotfixes do some checks on integrated file versions or their time compiled because with this sequence logicaly I would overwrite later an updated hotfix with older one that has higher number (under condition that there are few hotfixes that do patch same files) ?

thanks guys managed to filter out unecessery ones

ahh those bastards... I have these IE8-KB2362765 IE8-KB2416400 IE8-KB2447568 IE8-KB981332 IE8-KB982632 IE8-KB982664 but don't know which are obsolete, I noticed that 2 or 3 are related to that Compatibility View List thing but also dunno if one outranks the other