Multibooter

This does not happen on my desktop under Win98, with a bfg 7800 GS OC card and Geforce v77.72, and a 1600x1200 ViewSonic monitor. Full-size DOS window and regular DOS window work fine.

Hi rloew,With one wireless router in Europe the 3rd digit is 2, and I wasn't able to change it to 1, like for my other routers. That means whenever I am there I have to change the Windows IP settings for the gateway, of the laptop I take there, and to change it again when I am back in the US. Thanks for your hint, VERY helpful. Your Buffalo has apparently only 100 Mb Ethernet, like my current spare router. My son does games etc. on the internet, and he complained already that the spare router is too slow, with a 100Mb cable connection, so I probably will get a faster/Gigabit router. Your Buffalo router is on the dd-wrt compatibility list, have you installed the dd-wrt firmware in your router? dd-wrt firmware is open-source, so no government spyware. When I looked at their page about "Static DHCP" http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Static_DHCP I saw the mule, my favorite animal, and my router-phobia was forgotten.BTW, I am not yet sure whether Static DHCP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Host_Configuration_Protocol is for me. I have maybe 8 Netgear WPN511 wireless PC Cards, for my Inspiron 7500 laptops in various locations. Some WLAN cards were assigned under Windows the same IP number, even if they have different MAC numbers. Static DHCP seems to require the assignment of a unique IP number for every MAC number. Under Win98 I may reach unknown territory with the maximum number of instances of TCP/IP (the default maximum is 6, Win98 has been running Ok for me with MaxInstance set to 16 in section [MSTCP.ndi] in NETTRANS.INF, WinXP apparently does not have a restriction on the number of TCP/IP instances). The user manual http://support.asus.com/Download.aspx?SLanguage=en&p=11&m=RT-N66U%20%28VER.B1%29&os=8 did not mention Static DHCP, but perhaps with the dd-wrt firmware the router will have Static DHCP. I have been looking at the Asus RT-N66U router, quite pricey http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews/31687-asus-rt-n66u-dark-knight-dual-band-wireless-n900-gigabit-router-reviewed?start=1 This router seems to be in demand, the salesman at Frys told me that the day after they get a shipment the shelf is empty again. This router is also on the dd-wrt compatibility list http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Supported_Devices#Asus No idea whether this compatibility list is reliable, if not I'll have a $180 brick. My network printer HP2605d is not on the [uSB] printer compatibility list by Asus, but that doesn't matter since the printer works fine via Ethernet, under Win98 and WinXP. Any comments?

Thanks rloew. I will look into it when I eventually have to get a replacement for my broken wireless router in the next couple of weeks, my wife complains already about those Ethernet cables lying around all over. I have been putting off the purchase of a new wireless router always to the next week, maybe I am suffering from router-phobia.What complicates matters is that the computers have to work in the home networks in 3 countries, with 3 different ISPs, with ADSL and cable modem connections, and with routers of different makes/country settings/voltages, and with a different digit in the third field of the IP number. I probably will have to buy 3 identical routers. Any advice is appreciated, thanks again rloew. During a recent garage sale I bought a good shrink-wrapped Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, with 25 Client Access Licenses, for $3, and 3 thick books about Windows 2003 Server by Jerry Honeycutt, at the used book store of the public library, for $5. Would there be any benefit to migrate from Win98 to Windows 2003, instead of WinXP? Is there any use of installing Win2003 as an additional operating system selection, besides WinXP? Could one expect the support of Win2003 to go beyond that of WinXP? In other words, if one decides to move on from Win98SE, would it be better to move on to WinXP or to Win2003?

Good idea, definitely useful for inspecting individual files.It could perhaps also be done in Beyond Compare/Hex Viewer by creating a blank file containing only zeroes, and then comparing various DLLs against this blank file. On the left side of the Beyond Compare/Hex Viewer window is a sliding bar window, with lines or rectangles, depending on the size of the file and the size of the matching/differing sections. BTW, the mass-extraction with 7-zip of DLLs etc from the CAB files in .iso images or on CDs, indicated above, could perhaps be used to build a huge archive/repository of various versions of MS etc. DLLs. I still have among the stuff I got from a garage sale, for about $10, a binder filled with maybe 100 MS Technet Plus subscription CDs, Sept.1999 to July 2000, from a guy who was a MS certified something until the bust of the internet boom, and who then became a real estate agent, until the bust of the real estate boom. Would this be just a backup of stuff of an age gone by, or could such a pile of various DLL versions still be useful?

Hi duffy98,There are issues with Win98 and hotspots and WLAN. I have the additional problem that I have assigned fixed IPs to the WLAN cards in my desktops and laptops, and hotspots seem to require an automatic assignment of IP numbers to the WLAN card. With fixed IPs I can have shortcuts on the computer screen on all computers in the network, eMule etc requires the opening of ports on specific IPs, I have installed an HP2605n Color LaseJet network printer attached to my WLAN router via a fixed IP, and everything works fine for me with fixed IPs under both Win98SE and WinXP. I am currently thinking about setting up a network scanner. I understand nothing about networks. Wireless routers and and wireless networks are my bogeyman and cause horror in me. Whenever there is a wireless issue I get into a bad mood. When I stay at a hotel, I take a long Ethernet cable with me and go with my old laptop to the computer room to connect to the internet, via cable. 3 wireless routers have died on me during the past 4 years, their quality was just not made for continuous usage. When I was in Europe for several months, my 17-year-old called me in the middle of the night from the US: "The [wireless] router doesn't work anymore, I have to do some work for school on the internet and use the printer [connected to the wireless network]." The solution was to go to the public library and use the computer, internet and printer there, for a month until I came back. Maybe routers die when there is an automatic firmware update, with who knows what is added. I don't like government spyware, I have recently read that US spy agencies have spyware even built into the firmware of refrigerators, and a few days ago the driver on a highway was stopped by police equipped with special gear measuring the radioactivity of passing cars; the guy, a fireman, had just received a radioactive diagnostic injection for a heart problem. Big Brother is watching everywhere. The last wireless router died on me about a month ago, and I am currently using an ancient spare router, with no wireless part, where the firmware can probably not be updated automatically (the firmware version still displays Dec.2005), and with lots of long Ethernet cables to trip over. I'll never touch wireless Netgear routers again, any suggestions for a top-quality wireless router, which was not designed in the US [the label "designed in US" might perhaps be misinterpreted, in a fit of paranoia, to mean "designed to the specifications of FBxI, CIxA, NSxA & Co] ? Cloning a HDD is so much faster than re-installing operating systems and applications on several computers. Also, to support 3 laptops with different configurations and installations is already quite some task. The comment at the bottom of posting #11 might be interesting. With your approach you may have to activate for example your virus scanning software several times.

Interesting to know, drive letters are the scarcest resource on my computer, under WinXP even more so than under Win98SE, because Win98SE doesn't assign drive letters to NTFS partitions. I have both under Win98 and under WinXP 2 virtual drives, V: and W:, (V: is Alcohol, W: is UltraISO) so that I can compare the content of 2 mounted .iso/.nrg/.img/.bin etc. files with Beyond Compare, with 2 different virtual drive programs. I am not yet into Linux http://pwet.fr/man/linux/administration_systeme/isoinfo I assume that your mentioning of isoinfo implies that there is no utility under Windows which can search .iso files in a folder. If jaclaz can't find it, it probably doesn't exist Manually indexing 100+ iso files, and then searching the combined index, implies that this index has to be constantly updated for new .isos. So just having a 192GB partition on an external HDD with the extracted isos, and searching this EXTRACTED partition with Win98 Find still looks like the easiest approach to find stuff in my .isos, and also serves as an additional backup.

Hi bphlpt,I disagree with you for philosophical reasons. For me there are many roads which lead to Rome, so I haven't given up yet. 1. Test with Advanced CAB Repair v1.2: - I extracted all files from the bad .iso into a folder. The bad .iso contains about 130 corrupt files with zeroed-out "holes" in them - I renamed about 4500 files in this folder from*.??_ to *.CAB (e.g. .EX_, .DL_, .IN_). Advanced CAB Repair v1.2 only works on files with the .CAB extension - I made a Batch Repair of these 4500 CAB files - unfortunately, Advance CAB Repair repaired all except 2 .CAB files (the good ones and the corrupt ones), and did not display a message which CAB files were good, and which ones were bad. The actually corrupt CAB files contained after the repair corrupt DLLs, severely truncated in size. I checked just 1 dll files in a "repaired" cab: the extracted .DLL was 64KB, compared to 1092KB of the DLL extracted from a corresponding good CAB file. Advanced CAB Repair could neither flag corrupt CAB files, nor repair corrupt CAB files in this test, although MiTeC Explorer did display several tabs for the truncated DLL extracted from the corrupt/repairedCAB. 2. Test with 7-Zip: - I extracted again all files from the mounted bad .iso into a folder - without renaming any files I selected everything in that folder and had 7-Zip extract everything to another folder. Files which were not archives (e.g. boot.bmp) were displayed in the message window as "Can not open file xxx as archive". And here the amazing result of this experiment: - the corrupt CAB files were displayed in the message window like: K:\junk\I386\TRACERT6.EX_ Data error in 'tracert6.exe'. File is broken 7-Zip can apparently identify all broken CAB files and many other broken archive files in a .iso (.CH_, .DL_, .EX_, .JP_, .. TS_, .TT_, ., .EN_, .FR, .IT_, .CAB, .EXE, .CHM, etc) You simply have to: 1 - mount the .iso 2 - copy everything from the mounted .iso on the virtual drive to an empty folder 3 - select everything in this folder -> right-click and drag to another empty folder -> select 7-Zip -> select Extract Here The extraction may take 2-3 minutes. If no msg "File is broken" is displayed in the 7-Zip message window, the .iso contains no broken archives and the .iso is most likely Ok If there are broken archives in the .iso, 7-Zip will display them with the message "File is broken" Such isos have to be re-created, from the original bad CD. I have just tested in the manner described above a reconstructed .iso, which I had created from a really badly damaged CD. 7-Zip did not detect any broken archives in the .iso, so the recovery of this bad CD seems to have been successful. I am quite optimistic that there is a way to quickly identify corrupt DLLs, and hope that somebody else will pick up from here.

Wow, a 4TB ext.HDD working under Win98! My full respect! How should such a drive be partitioned/formatted, for access under Win98?I have a special Win98 opsys without nusb, for testing manufacturer-provided drivers under Win98. The enclosure does work fine under Win98 with the Win98 driver v1.04 by JMicron, with a Pioneer BD-R 203 SATA blu-ray burner inside, so a SATA HDD should work fine also. The exe installer file of the JMicron driver v1.04 has a time-stamp of 8-Dec-2006, so I am a little skeptical about its ability to "Support 4K sectors HDD command". Does nusb require an update to handle HDDs >2TB?

Hi rloew,Does this mean that a 4TB HDD inside this enclosure would be recognized under Win98 with your patch? How much of the 4TB would be accessible under Win98? Should nusb or the manufacturer-provided driver be used under Win98SE?

Thanks loblo.With a .really badly damaged DLL file MiTeC displayed "File is not in supported format". With another badly damaged file MiTeC only displayed the Hex View tab, not the other tabs like Header, Section, Directories etc. Damaged files from CDs most likely don't differ from good files by just a few bytes, but rather contain zeroed-out sector-size "holes" [about 2k, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-ROM , multiplied by the number of contiguous bad sectors], so damaged files from a bad CD have a quite distinct look in Beyond Compare/Hex Viewer when compared to the good file, and can be immediately recognized as damaged. I am not interested in the authenticity of files (e.g. from MS), but in the integrity, there may be quite a few patched files in these 100+ .isos. Sad to hear this. I had thought that there could be a reverse-engineering tool which de-compiles, de-links or whatever and then comes up with a message like "success" or "failure" of the process, and thereby identifies the corrupt files.But let me re-phrase my question: Is there a tool which can identify a DLL as corrupt? This would help a lot, because it would tell me which isos of the 100+ would have to be re-created from the CDs. Even a tool which can identify some bad DLLs would be of help, because the flagging of just 1 bad DLL would be sufficient as a flag for a bad .iso/bad CD. Well, as I am thinking about it, maybe it's easier to extract flat all cab files (DL_, EX_, IN_) from a .iso image, and then test extract these CAB files. A bad CAB file would flag a bad .iso just as well as a bad DLL. But there must be a more elegant solution, with 100+ .isos. Maybe a CAB repair tool could flag bad cab files in a mounted .iso, I'll be checking.

Hi loblo, ImgBurn, for examle, displays a message when it creates a .iso file and encounters a bad sector during read-in. So creating a good .iso file with ImgBurn in the future is no problem, but what should I do with the 100+ .iso files created over the years with UltraISO? Maybe only 5% of these .iso files contain zeroed-out bad sectors, but which .iso files are the bad ones, i.e. which of my CD/DVD backups are bad? A safe way to verify that a .iso was created correctly is to mount the .iso and make a binary compare with Beyond Compare of the files on the CD vs the mounted .iso image, although this does not verify the content of the boot sector on the CD, if the CD is bootable. With old, nearly-bad CDs this compare might become a nightmare. Also, how can one know that a downloaded .iso file doesn't contain corrupt .DLL files? MiTeC EXE Explorer can somewhat analyse the integrity of a DLL, e.g. if I open a .DLL file with MiTeC EXE Explorer, and it - indicates a good .exe type, and - under the Resource tab -> BITMAP section, all entries greater 1x1 display good images in the bottom window of MiTeC the .DLL may be Ok, but there is no guarantee. Using MiTeC EXE Explorer would be feasible for checking a few individual DLL files, but not for checking 100+ .iso files. Another solution may be to re-create the 100+ iso files from the CDs with ImgBurn, but this is very time-consuming and some CDs may have gone bad since the time the previous .iso files were created with UltraISO. Any other suggestions?

Hi loblo,The discussion here about WinXP Search, for example, is not just about a WinXP tweak, but about issues faced when migrating from Win9x to WinXP. I think that the Win98-forum is a forum for Win98-guys, and anything reasonable which concerns Win98-guys has a place here, whether it's migrating to Linux, or installing a CP/M co-processor under DOS. Instead of being strictly subject-orientated, I would rather define the Win9x forum in a people-orientated way, as a group of people with some common interest in Win9x, who look at WinXP, Windows 7 etc from a common background. Maybe I would call it an Alumni Club of Win9x graduates .

I am looking for a tool to easily and quickly check the integrity of Win9x/XP DLLs. UltraISO and WinISO, for example, can quickly create a good-looking .iso from a bad CD (e.g. in UltraISO with -> Tools -> Make CD/DVD Image), without displaying a message that a bad sector was encountered on the CD during read-in. Bad sectors on the CD are usually stored in an .iso image as zeroes. As a result, files extracted from such an .iso may contain "holes" filled with zeroes, as displayed by Beyond Compare/Hex Viewer when compared against a good file. Ideally the tool should be able to go quickly thru all the dll files in a mounted .iso and flag those which are corrupt. I have 100+ .iso images, which I would like to check whether they contain corrupt DLLs. Ideally the tool should also identify corrupt CAB files (e.g. .DL_, .EX_ and .IN_) in a mounted .iso, and flag corrupt DLLs inside a CAB file in a .iso Any suggestions?

Looks like good old Jaclaz-style: A can of worms innocuously thrown in. Any ideas about how to search in .iso files? I currently have maybe 100+ .iso files extracted to a separate HDD partition "EXTRACTED", and search this partition with Win98 Find. It works, but it is not a good solution.

I don't quite remember, but the reason why I gave up on WinXP Search may have been that some time after disabling the search in zip files, WinXP Search started to search again inside of zip files, without my having done anything. Maybe there was a small system crash or a bad shutdown under WinXP, and an earlier registry was restored, who knows. One major issue with WinXP is that I have not the faintest idea what's under the hood, but maybe the problem is not WinXP, but my lack of knowledge. Here a good description of WFP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_File_Protection Maybe disabling WFP is not that good an idea, WinXP seems to repair itself after a bad crash. But after some bad crashes, which have occurred already several times on my desktops, WinXP couldn't come up anymore, it was in a crashing loop after the desktop came up, and the only way I could recover was to restore with Ghost a good WinXP backup partition. This example also shows that data files should not be stored on the same partition as WinXP.

Hi jaclaz,I fiddled around with WinXP Search some time ago, but I wasn't happy with it, I forgot why and I didn't document it, so when I want to search my 1TB software archives, I boot into Win98SE and use Win98 Find, or I connect the external HDD to be searched to my 2nd computer on my desk, if Win98 is currently running there. I have posted below the note about WinXP Search from my personal InfoSelect v3.0 notebook, which contains my personal notes of the past 18 years, easily searchable: ----- BEGIN INFOSEL NOTE ---- *MS Search (WinXP) 10/10/2010 . is not as good as the MS Find (Win98), which can look into the Win98 root kit How to keep MS Search (WinXP) from looking into .zip archives -> Start -> Run: [without quotation marks] "regsvr32 /u I:\WINXPSP2\system32\zipfldr.dll" (this is the DLLUnregisterServer) 10/3/2010 in window RegSvr32: "DllUnregisterServer in I:\WINXPSP2\system32\zipfldr.dll succeeded" -> Ok . to reset to default again: regsvr32 I:\WINXPSP2\system32\zipfldr.dll 10/3/2010 NOTE: afterwards you have to associate .zip again with WinRAR How to remove the dog with the wagging tail . run MS TweakUI v2.10 (WinXP) -> Explorer -> select "Use Classic Search Engine in Explorer" 1/15/2010 NOTE: after disabling/enabling searching in .zip files, you may have to re-associate .zip with WinRAR 11/24/2010 ------ END INFOSEL NOTE -------- Thanks for posting the link mentioning FindOnClick, which I plan to try out eventually. I am looking for a good search utility which can also search .iso files, any suggestions? I don't want any indexing done by a search tool. One large folder, for example, with the German-language Digitale Bibliothek is 119GB and contains currently 426.729 files in 1258 sub-folders, so indexing would take a little while. Also, indexing by MS Office probably enabled the awful Tenga virus to infect most .exe files on my laptop and on an external 1 TB software archive drive, with blazing speed, 2 years ago. BTW, InfoSelect v3.0 did not get infected by Tenga, because its .exe file is an ancient "New executable (Win 3.1)", and I was able to search my notes after the infection, while most other software ceased working. One more reason to keep an instance of old Win98, with old software. I am not particularly interested in searching NTFS partitions, since nearly all my stuff is on FAT32, the NTFS Data partition on each of my external HDDs contains only a small number of huge files >2GB.

My system got much faster after I got rid of ZoneAlarm. I am using Kerio Personal Firewall v2.1.5 now. I have never backed up a drive or a partition to a DVD with Ghost v11.0.2.1573 standalone, only to a .gho file on a HDD. My backups with Ghost are usually partition backups, not backups of the whole HDD. I back up the WinXP partition under Win98 with Ghost.To back up my Win98 installation I do not use Ghost, but WinRAR under WinXP. I save under WinXP the \Windows\ and \Program Files\ folders of the Win98 installation as a .rar file, and the install-to folders on various partitions as separate .rar files, whenever a new software is installed. The installation of Win98SE on my laptop is nearly 9 years old and unfortunately spread out over various partitions. I am using on my old latops Netgear WPN511 wireless PC Cards, which have worked fine under Win98SE and WinXP. Netgear may have removed the Win98 drivers from their site. My Dell Inspiron 7500 laptops do not have a built-in wireless card, only an optionally built-in modem, which is quite easy to remove. Maybe the wireless card can be disabled in your hardware profile. You will need the repair/service manual for your laptop, don't try without it. It takes me about 40 minutes to take all the parts out of my laptop, including the motherboard and the PCMCIA cage, but about 2 hours to put the pile of pieces back together again. I have done it quite a few times, and damaged 2 laptops in the process. Taking apart a laptop, and putting it back together again, is much more difficult than doing the same with a desktop.

I stocked up on spare Asus P5PE-VM motherboards some time ago. I still have to test and then stock up on Intel Core 2 X6800 Extreme CPUs, prices have come down, but they are still not cheap.Here a potential item to stock up: The external USB enclosure http://www.ebay.com/itm/5-25-3-5-USB-Enclosure-w-Fan-for-SATA-HDD-CD-DVD-BD-/190350685036?pt=US_Drive_Enclosures_Docks&hash=item2c51c8f36c for SATA burners. So-so workmanship, noisy fan which I disconnected, but altogether highly recommended because it has a great chipset and its own manufacturer-provided Win98 driver. Eventually it will be gone, and Frys in California doesn't have any external enclosures for SATA burners.. I have put a Pioneer BDR-203 SATA blu-ray burner in it, it works fine under WinXP and Win98SE with both the manufacturer/ebay-dealer-provided Win98SE driver v1.04 and with nusb. Info about the chipset inside is at http://www.jmicron.com/Product_JM20329.htm No idea what the "Support 4K sectors HDD command" claim there would mean under Win98SE.

Hi dencorso,Last call to stock up on Win98-compatible hardware, the shelves will be empty next year. The pipeline of Win98-compatible hardware is about to dry up, most of the old hardware seems to have gone already to the trash/recycler. In California, for example, not much Win98-compatible computer stuff is offered at garage sales anymore.

Hi Fredledingue,I have 2 computers on my desk running at the same time, my Asus dual-core desktop (1600x1200 display) and my 11-year-old Inspiron 7500 laptop (1400x1050 display). Both computers are connected perfectly to each other via a wireless network, under both WinXP and Win98SE. The 2 screens on the desk make it easier to work on 2 different projects at the same time. My desktop and laptop computers are multi-booting, contain roughly the same software and have a very similar icon layout on the screen, under both Win98 and WinXP. Definitely WinXP, NOT Windows 7, at least for me: I had DOS, Win98SE, WinXP and Windows Vista installed on the same computer with System Commander. I removed Windows Vista again because it had aggressive behaviour towards the partitions of the other operating systems and I didn't want to endanger my main work horses. PartitonMagic v8.01 doesn't work with Vista partitions, neither does Partition Table Doctor v3.5 http://www.ptdd.com/features.htm , so Vista should probably be installed on another internal HDD ( I actually installed Vista on a 2nd internal HDD). So you need an extra HDD spinning all the time, for whatever additional applications Win7 offers over WinXP.Also, when you get Win7, it is quite likely that older hardware/add-ons/peripherals will NOT work with it. Here an example: You can currently get at ebay or craigslist in the US a lot of good, working scanners, which people can't use anymore after they "upgraded" to Windows 7. About a month ago I bought at a garage sale a nicely working CanoScan N1240U scanner (1200dpi, USB) for $2. The seller was kind of sad and would have kept it, it had served him well for a long time, but it didn't work with his new Windows 7 computer, no drivers. Finding CPUs, motherboards, video cards, WLAN cards, printers and scanners which are compatible with both Win98SE and Windows 7 is probably a challenge. Maybe feasible in a big market like the US, less feasible in small countries.

Hi duffy98, I have also migrated most of my applications from Win98SE to WinXP. I am currently using WinXP 80% of the time, Win98SE 20%. Although my use of Win98SE has decreased, Win98SE will stay on my computers indefinitely, and I still consider myself a Win98-guy. I have on all my computers a multi-booting setup, which allows me to use DOS, Win98SE and WinXP. I am still browsing quite a bit under Win98SE, mainly for better privacy and nearly always when going to dangerous sites where there is a risk to catch a trojan/virus. Win98SE on my computers is turning slowly but steadily into a special-purpose operating system, for special tasks: 1) to fix up the HDD with Norton Disk Doctor 2004, after WinXP crashes badly and before rebooting again into WinXP. WinXP, when restarting after a real bad crash, can on rare occasions auto-destroy itself by deleting/"repairing" essential files. NDD also repairs the boot area of a FAT32 drive/partition, when it contains invalid information about the drive's free space. WinXP reports such drives as Ok, but doesn't work properly anymore. 2) to partition new hard disk drives (mainly external 1TB drives) with PowerQuest PartitionMagic v8.01 Build 1274 into several logical FAT32 partitions [each up to 192GB] and one logical NTFS partition. I would not entrust my precious archived data to HDDs partitioned with other partitioning software. 3) to create and restore images, under Win98SE, of WinXP partitions with Norton Ghost v11.0.2 standalone 4) to repair file system errors on FAT32 partitions, created under WinXP [e.g. path name too long, created when copying a folder with already a long path as a subfolder into another folder with also a long path]. Files with such errors cannot be accessed or deleted under WinXP. Under Win98 such files can be accessed/deleted in a DOS window using the short DOS file name, which is not possible in a WinXP Command window. 5) as a repository of old versions of software, which can do things which newer versions can't. Under WinXP I have installed the newer version. Eventually I will have installed for many applications an especially interesting older version under Win98SE, and a more recent version under WinXP. Here an example, although a little off topic: Under Win98SE I have installed Jasc Paint Shop Pro v7.0.4, while under WinXP I have v9.0.1. The main difference between these two versions is a "trojan" module, provided by government agencies shortly after Sep.11, 2001, in the name of fighting banknote forgeries. Paint Shop Pro v7.0.4, Adobe Photoshop v7.0.1 and Adobe Photoshop Elements v2.0.2 were the last builds tested which do not check what you are scanning. Newer versions contain a "trojan" module and when scanning a banknote (e.g. $5 and higher) display a warning message and connect to the internet. The exact content of this "trojan" module has not been disclosed, no idea whether additional stuff, besides the banknote-checking, is included. BTW, the builds of Paint Shop Pro with the built-in "trojan" module require IE 6.0 or higher, and don't install if IE 6.0 or higher is not present. The last version of Paint Shop Pro which does not include this "trojan" module (i.e. v7.0.4) does not have this requirement. No idea why scanning software would all on a sudden require an Internet browser - or does the "trojan"module require IE6? Maybe spyware by the government requires IE6, the browser which shipped with WinXP. Could the government have discouraged support for Win98, so that the majority of computers in the world would have WinXP/IE6 (or higher) as a standard interface for built-in government backdoors? Win98, old software and old hardware might provide some privacy from the prying eyes of Big Brother. 6) to search for files. Win98 Find is much superior to the WinXP Search: a) WinXP Search also searches in .zip archives, making it painfully slow if big .zip files are in the search path, and occasionally it seems to be making endless loops b ) Win98 Find even finds nearly-invisible "cloaked" files. Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6, for example, hides the license key, downloaded from their registration server after entering a new activation code, until the first reboot, as a cloaked file, invisible under Win98/XP. Win98 Find, however, can find it and save it. Of course the recovered key should not be used to activate Kaspersky on other computers, or under WinXP. c) If WinXP resides on a FAT32 partition, Win98 Find can easily find anything hidden or cloaked under WinXP. Could one imagine the excellent Win98 Find being replaced with a toothless WinXP Search doggie with a wagging tail, so that it could be harder to find cloaked stuff, like government rootkits? 7) to download signature updates for Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6, and then make them available in the Update Folder. Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6 on other computers/operating system installations can update their signatures from this Update Folder. Since Kaspersky 6 was installed initially under Win98 on my computer, I also download the signature updates under Win98. Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6 under Win98SE can also scan the WinXP partition (FAT32) and other computers across the network. 8) to run GRDuw, an excellent floppy-disk software, which does not run under WinXP 9) to run Visual Basic 6/Visual Studio 6. Supposedly, but I haven't tried it yet, Visual Basic 6 applications work fine under Linux+Vine. My first programming language was BASIC, 41 years ago, and I have a piece of software written with the MS Basic Compiler 30 years ago, which I may bring over to Linux, as an exercise. Actually I have wanted to migrate from Microsoft to Unix/Linux for the past 30 years, but I never got around, there were just too many new applications on the Microsoft platform and not enough time. Eventually one migrates there where most of one's applications are. Multi-booting allows you to keep your old toolbox. duffy 98, don't give up on Win98SE, go the multi-booting route. Regarding the installation of WinXP there may be two considerations to think about: 1) WinXP works just as fine on a FAT32 partition and a FAT32 partition can be accessed under Win98 2) A registered WinXP could perhaps be compared to crippled software. When a cloned HDD, with Win98 on it, is inserted into another computer, the only technical issues may be with drivers. A cloned HDD with a not crippled WinXP could perhaps work technically fine with most computers, without the driver issues of Win98, but it is advised against here, unless the appropriate licenses are obtained.

Low-level formatting a de-magnetized Iomega zip disk would be a major project, and I have no idea whether it can be done. If your zip disk is not completely bad, you might try to low-level format it with the Iomega SCSI Utilities for DOS (Tools for DOS) [scsiutil.exe] under pure DOS. If that doesn't work, I would buy a new zip disk.

Maybe a SIM card reader helps, The MSI SIM Card Editor v4.0, which is on the mini-CD of the MSI StarReader mini II, requires WinXP or Win2000 according to the user manual, but the software installed Ok under Win98. I have not tested this software, only installed it under Win98. There may be a chance that it runs Ok under Win98 because the card reader comes with a manufacturer-provided Win98 driver.

In Germany a major political scandal is brewing about the German federal police apparently planting trojans, ignoring prohibitions by the highest German court. It's currently the top story (in German) of the Spiegel, "Programmed breach of the constitution" http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/0,1518,790768,00.html The description of the Backdoor:W32/R2D2.A is at http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00002249.html No idea whether this backdoor works under Win98 Here a posting by Noob at http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=1952822 : "only F-Secure, Clam AV and Kaspersky detects it". I was also a little surprised that Clam AV detected it. If Kaspersky should stop providing signature updates for v6.0 after October 2012, maybe Clam AV can continue to provide protection for Win98 against new malware. Kaspersky v6.0, with its big signature data base, could then still detect old malware. A possible solution to the looming virus scanner issue under Win98 might be to use 2 scanners, Kaspersky for pre-October-2012 malware, and Clam AV for post-October-2012 malware. Several other virus scanners can at this moment detect this Backdoor, perhaps after some decision-making. Here the constantly updated list by Virus Total: http://www.virustotal.com/file-scan/report.html?id=be36ce1e79ba6f97038a6f9198057abecf84b38f0ebb7aaa897fd5cf385d702f-1318148319

Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0 still updates Ok under Win98, my last manual signature update was about a week ago. Russian Kaspersky helping the U.S. military? Kaspersky Anti-Virus 6.0 is the best virus scanner under Win98SE. www.drudgereport.com just had as its top headline a link to http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/virus-hits-drone-fleet/ and it looks like even the U.S. military look for Russian help: the technicians at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada "followed removal instructions posted on the website of the Kaspersky security firm. “But the virus kept coming back,” a source familiar with the infection says". The comment there by David Banes may or may not be indicative of the quality of Symantec software: "I'm sorry but I've got 20+ years experience in the anti-virus industry (some of it running virus research for Symantec) so to see the comment “We keep wiping it off, and it keeps coming back,” in the text above just tells me that the person trying to remove this virus is not qualified for the job, which is very scary given where it is!" It took the Iranians maybe a year to get the Stuxnet virus out of their nuclear and industrial sites. About 2 years ago I had a nasty infection on my laptop (i.e. a simple single-user environment) with the Tenga virus, which came back 2 times within 3 months of the initial infection.